Time:owner-libertylaw@blake.sharpcomm.com  Fri Oct  4 07:43:21 1996
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 1996 08:41:29 -1000
To: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org
From: liberty@mcn.net (Paul Andrew Mitchell)
Subject: Re: LLAW: Re: recent e-mail
=======================================================================
LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
=======================================================================
>=======================================================================
>LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
>Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
>=======================================================================
>Yes Dale! This is a serious discussion group.  You will be immersed in views
>from true Patriots who are in the front line trenches fighting the fight.  We
>talk about Jurisdiction, venue, cases, court procedure and strategies, the TAX
>fraud, Citizen v. citizen, etc.  The technology that the power elite who usurp
>their oaths and the Constutution use against us...we use the same technology
>to fight them.  Just like the double edge sword of Law...the sword of high
>technology cuts both ways.
(:-:)

>
>Yours in Liberty
>John Edward Burr
>------------------------------
>Date: 10/3/96 7:35 PM
>To: John Burr
>From: joseph.d.robertson@nhmccd.cc.t
>
>3 October 96 @ 2110 Hours CST
>
>John Edward Burr:
>
>I have received your e-mail along with several others. velly, velly
>interesting!!!
>
>I am quite impressed with the speed with which the message was sent
>delivered, remailed to liberty law and the resulting responses and their
>remail to me at my address all in the span of less than 18 hours! I
>refer to you, mike Innerarity, Schweitzer Pr, Paul Mitchell, charles
>Stewart, & Lyle Charles Iver, Myhr Jr. Because of the impact of this
>technology on me for the first time, I am constrained to recall that
>only 10 years ago the same transactions would probably have taken at
>least 10 days and probably more like 20 days minimum.
>
>The last in the above list says:
>
>"Aye! permission to come aboard, granted.
>
>INFECT ME!
>
>Lyle Charles Iver, Myhr Jr."
>
>Is ths really the "jolly roger" or is this a serious exchange group with
>a serious agenda in which they have committed themselves?
>
>It will be saturday when I can next respond since I will be occupied the
>entirely of tomorrow on scheduled obligations.
>
>Thanks again for you reception to my "verbosity" and request to come
>aboard!
>
>Constitutionally,
>
>Joseph Dale Robertson
>
>
>
>I speak with such impressionable tenor since this is my first experience
>with e-mail.  
>
>
>
>
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail