Time: Wed Oct 30 00:08:30 1996
To: dean
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:07:46 -0700 (MST)
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@primenet.com>
>To: [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>
>The original message was received at Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:06:03 -0700 (MST)
>from ip-43-011.tus.primenet.com [206.165.43.11]
>
>   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><Ninth.Wave@concentric.net>
>
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to mailhost.concentric.net.:
>>>> RCPT To:<Ninth.Wave@concentric.net>
><<< 550 <Ninth.Wave@concentric.net>... User unknown
>550 <Ninth.Wave@concentric.net>... User unknown
>
>   ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:06:03 -0700 (MST)
>To: Ninth.Wave@concentric.net, "Inc." <nwave@ninthw.com>
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: The Purpose of the Philadelphia Experiment
>
>Dean/Stefani,
>
>Thanks.  The videotape has been
>quite thoroughly trashed by
>subsequent posts.  It was a 
>scam, evidently.  But I do
>believe something quite incredible
>happened in Philadelphia harbor
>that day.  The movie goes into
>some detail.
>
>Thanks for the update on the web 
>page.  Security is shaping up to
>be a very high priority.  Hang
>in there;  this is a roller coaster
>like no other.  The whole nation
>now hangs in the balance.  A very
>black storm cloud is forming
>on the near horizon.  It will take
>about 3 to 4 years to blow by.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
>At 10:59 PM 10/29/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Hey Paul:
>>
>>Most intriguing.  I am both a fan of possibility and a diehard
>>skeptic.  I always listen to evidence, but always hold 
>>judgement until I have sufficient facts.
>>
>>Carl Sagan said that "Extraordinary claims require
>>extraordinary evidence."  I totally agree.  
>>
>>I have never seen
>>a compelling account of this experiment.  Srong magnetic fields
>>will bend CHARGED particles, but photons are not charged.  What might
>>have been expected is that the strong magnetic field would ionize the 
>>air near the ship, changing the refractive index and thus creating
>>the bedning of light.  This would seem to support other things
>>I've heard about the arora or glow supposedly seen on the ship.
>
>The crew who survived tell a
>wild story about jumping 
>overboard into the future,
>some 40 years hence.  See
>the movie for a fairly 
>faithful account, at least
>the first half-hour.  The 
>love story was made up for
>audience interest.  Al Bielek
>(sp?) was a survivor.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
>>
>>I'm quite certain that most if not all of the paranormal, UFO, X-files
>>type stuff is to some extent real.  I'm also sure that the fed knows
>>quite a bit.  The radiations tests on humans, the Iraq nerve gas... etc.
>>are just some examples.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Dean
>>
>>BTW - new stuff is being downloaded to the website tonight and tomorrow.
>>
>>>Dear Geoffrey,
>>>
>>>I may ramble a bit here, but I thought
>>>this might be pertinent, if not 
>>>directly on point.  I once saw a neat
>>>videotape of a young scientist from
>>>Area 51.  He was in his 30's, maybe
>>>early 40's.  He began the tape by
>>>driving up to a desert location in
>>>his Corvette Stingray.  He gets out
>>>and begins to describe the physics of
>>>interstellar travel.  He went into detail
>>>about the propulsion system:  a special
>>>element, very high on the periodic chart,
>>>which has such a dense nucleus, the 
>>>strong force actually radiates out beyond
>>>the geometry of the nucleus itself.  This
>>>strong force can be amplified, mostly
>>>through the use of decaying anti-matter
>>>and special devices which are currently
>>>being developed at Area 51.  Once the
>>>strong force is amplified, like any FM
>>>signal is amplified, the time-space
>>>continuum begins to warp.  In this fashion,
>>>very distance places, like the Alpha 
>>>Centauri, can be "brought here", without
>>>having to wait the incredibly long periods
>>>of time it would take to reach such distant
>>>places, moving at normal light speed.  
>>>When the amplifier is no longer necessary, 
>>>it is turned off, and the space ship 
>>>finds itself at the new location.
>>>This all happens in a rather short period
>>>of time, say 5 minutes or less.  
>>>
>>>Can it be that the Philadelphia Experiment
>>>was dealing with the exact same kind of
>>>generators and amplifiers?
>>>
>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Dean C. Hines, Ph.D.           | Disclaimer: My views don't necessarily   
>> |
>>Steward Observatory            | reflect those of Steward Observatory     
>> |
>>933 N. Cherry Ave.             | or the University of Arizona...          
>> |
>>Tucson, AZ 85721 (520)621-3445 | 
>>http://nimbus.as.arizona.edu:8000/~dhines |
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail