Time: Mon Jan 27 06:06:43 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id GAA27955; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 06:14:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 06:14:17 -0700 (MST) To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Philip Freneau >Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 05:53:52 >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: Philip Freneau >Bcc: liberty lists > >[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > > > Philip Freneau: > > Rules for Changing a Republic > [into a Democracy and then] > into a Monarchy > > > from: > > > Organizing the New Nation > > THE ANNALS OF AMERICA > > Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. > > 1784-1796 > > > > Those who had opposed the constitution thought their fears >justified by the conduct of the government that began to function >in 1789. Under the aggressive leadership of Alexander Hamilton, >the Secretary of the Treasury, economic measures were taken that >favored the few, while a effective party machine was organized >and the army strengthened in such a way as to suggest an intent >to control rather than to represent the many. The whole tone of >Washington's administration was aristocratic, favoring as it did >the educated, the wealthy, the clergy and the press, who were >fearful of "mob rule" and preferred to see what Hamilton called >"gentlemen of principle and property" in command. As Hamilton >had at his service a newspaper -- John Fenno's Gazette of the >United States -- to support his policies, his opponents, led by >Jefferson and Madison, decided to establish a rival newspaper, >the National Gazette. Philip Freneau, an experienced journalist >of known democratic leanings, was chosen to edit the paper. The >editorial, reprinted here, is typical of those in which Freneau >criticized the Hamiltonian program from 1791 to 1793. > > >Source: American Museum, July 1792: "Rules for Changing a Limited >Republican Government into an Unlimited Hereditary One." > > > Reformatted for Microsoft WORD 5.0 for DOS > > by > > John E. Trumane > Account for Better Citizenship > December 21, 1992 > > [Read aloud with heavy British accent.] > > > > Rules for changing a limited republican government into an >unlimited hereditary one: > > 1. It being necessary in order to effect the change, to >get rid of constitutional shackles and popular prejudices, all >possible means and occasions are to be used for both these >purposes. > > 2. Nothing being more likely to prepare the vulgar mind >for aristocratical ranks and hereditary powers than titles, >endeavor in the offset of the government to confer these on its >most dignified officers. If the principal magistrate should >happen to be particularly venerable in the eyes of the people, >take advantage of that fortunate circumstance in setting the >example. > > 3. Should the attempt fail through his republican aversion >to it, or from the danger of alarming the people, do not abandon >the enterprise altogether, but lay up the proposition in the >record. Time may gain it respect, and it will be there always >ready, cut and dried, for any favorable conjuncture that may >offer. > > 4. In drawing all bills, resolutions and reports, keep >constantly in view that the limitations in the Constitution are >ultimately to be explained away. Precedents and phrases may thus >be shuffled in, without being adverted to by candid or weak >people, of which good use may afterward be made. > > 5. As the novelty and bustle of inaugurating the >government will for some time keep the public mind in a heedless >and unsettled state, let the press during this period be busy in >propagating the doctrines of monarchy and aristocracy. For this >purpose, it will be particularly useful to confound a mobbish >democracy with a representative republic, that by exhibiting all >the turbulent examples and enormities of the former, an odium may >be thrown on the character of the latter. Review all the civil >contests, convulsions, factions, broils, squabbles, bickering, >black eyes and bloody noses of ancient, middle and modern ages; >caricature them into the most frightful forms and colors that can >be imagined, and unfold one scene of horrible tragedy after >another till the people be made, if possible, to tremble at their >own shadows. Let the discourses on Davila then contrast with >these pictures of terror the quiet hereditary succession, the >reverence claimed by birth and nobility, and the fascinating >influence of stars, and ribbons and garters, cautiously >suppressing all the bloody tragedies and unceasing oppressions >which form the history of this species of government. No pains >should be spared in this part of the undertaking, for the >greatest will be wanted, it being extremely difficult, especially >when a people have been taught to reason and feel their rights, >to convince them that a king, who is always an enemy to the >people, and a nobility, who are perhaps still more so, will take >better care of the people than the people will take of >themselves. > > 6. But the grand nostrum will be a public debt, provided >enough of it can be got and it be medicated with the proper >ingredients. If by good fortune a debt be ready at hand, the >most is to be made of it. Stretch it and swell it to the utmost >the items will bear. Allow as many extra claims as decency will >permit. Assume all the debts of your neighbors -- in a word, get >as much debt as can be raked and scraped together, and when you >have got all you can, "advertise" for more, and have the debt >made as big as possible. This object being accomplished, the >next will be to make it as perpetual as possible; and the next >to that, to get it into as few hands as possible. The more >effectually to bring this about, modify the debt, complicate it, >divide it, subdivide it, subtract it, postpone it, let there be >one-third of two-thirds, and two-thirds of one-third, and two- >thirds of two-thirds; let there be 3 percents, and 4 percents, >and 6 percents, and present 6 percents, and future 6 percents. >To be brief, let the whole be such a mystery that a few only can >understand it; and let all possible opportunities and >informations fall in the way of these few to cinch their >advantages over the many. > > 7. It must not be forgotten that the members of the >legislative body are to have a deep stake in the game. This is >an essential point, and happily is attended with no difficulty. >A sufficient number, properly disposed, can alternately legislate >and speculate, and speculate and legislate, and buy and sell, and >sell and buy, until a due portion of the property of their >constituents has passed into their hands to give them an interest >against their constituents, and to ensure the part they are to >act. All this, however, must be carried on under the cover of >the closest secrecy; and it is particularly lucky that dealings >in paper admit of more secrecy that any other. Should a >discovery take place, the whole plan may be blown up. > > 8. The ways in which a great debt, so constituted and >applied, will contribute to the ultimate end in view are both >numerous and obvious: > > >(1) The favorite few, thus possessed of it, whether within or > without the government, will feel the staunchest fealty to > it, and will go through thick and thin to support it in all > its oppressions and usurpations. > >(2) Their money will give them consequence and influence, even > among those who have been tricked out of it. > >(3) They will be the readiest materials that can be found for a > hereditary aristocratic order, whenever matters are ripe for > one. > >(4) A great debt will require great taxes; great taxes, many > tax gatherers and other officers; and all officers are > auxiliaries of power. > >(5) Heavy taxes may produce discontents; these may threaten > resistance; and in proportion to this danger will be the > pretense for a standing army to repel it. > >(6) A standing army, in its turn, will increase the moral force > of the government by means of its appointments, and give it > physical force by means of the sword, thus doubly forwarding > the main object. > > > 9. The management of a great funded debt and a extensive >system of taxes will afford a plea, not to be neglected, for >establishment of a great incorporated bank. The use of such a >machine is well understood. If the Constitution, according to >its fair meaning, should not authorize it, so much the better. >Push it through by a forced meaning and you will get in the >bargain an admirable precedent for future misconstructions. > > In fashioning the bank, remember that it is to be made >particularly instrumental in enriching and aggrandizing the elect >few, who are to be called in due season to the honors and >felicities of the kingdom preparing for them, and who are the >pillars that must support it. It will be easy to throw the >benefit entirely into their hands, and to make it a solid >addition of 50, or 60, or 70 percent to their former capitals of >800 percent, or 900 percent, without costing them a shilling; >while it will be difficult to explain to the people that this >gain of the few is at the cost of the many, that the contrary may >be boldly and safely pretended. The bank will be pregnant with >other important advantages. It will admit the same men to be, at >the same time, members of the bank and members of the government. >The two institutions will thus be soldered together, and each >made stronger. Money will be put under the direction of the >government, and government under the direction of money. To >crown the whole, the bank will have a proper interest in swelling >and perpetuating the public debt and public taxes, with all the >blessings of both, because its agency and its profits will be >extended in exact proportion. > > 10. "Divide and govern" is a maxim consecrated by the >experience of ages, and should be familiar in its use to every >politician as the knife he carries in his pocket. In the work >here to be executed, the best effects may be produced by this >maxim, and with peculiar facility. An extensive republic made up >of lesser republics necessarily contains various sorts of people, >distinguished by local and other interests and prejudices. Let >the whole group be well examined in all its parts and relations, >geographical and political, metaphysical and metaphorical; let >there be first a northern and a southern section, by a line >running east and west, and then an eastern and western section, >by a line running north and south. By a suitable nomenclature, >the landholders cultivating different articles can be >discriminated from one another, all from the class of merchants, >and both from that of manufacturers. > > One of the subordinate republics may be represented as a >commercial state, another as a navigation state, another as a >manufacturing state, others as agricultural states; and although >the great body of people in each be really agricultural, and the >other characters be more or less common to all, still it will be >politic to take advantage of such an arrangement. Should the >members of the great republic be of different sizes, and subject >to little jealousies on that account, another important division >will be ready formed to your hand. Add again the division that >may be carved out of personal interests, political opinions, and >local parties. With so convenient an assortment of votes, >especially with the help of the marked ones, a majority may be >packed for any question with as much ease as the odd trick by an >adroit gamester, and any measure whatever carried or defeated, as >the great revolution to be brought about may require. > > It is only necessary, therefore, to recommend that full use >be made of the resource; and to remark that, besides the direct >benefit to be drawn from these artificial divisions, they will >tend to smother the true and natural one, existing in all >societies, between the few who are always impatient of political >equality and the many who can never rise above it; between those >who are to mount to the prerogatives and those who are to be >saddled with the burdens of the hereditary government to be >introduced -- in one word, between the general mass of the >people, attached to their republican government and republican >interests, and the chosen band devoted to monarchy and Mammon. >It is of infinite importance that this distinction should be kept >out of sight. The success of the project absolutely requires it. > > 11. As soon as sufficient progress in the intended change >shall have been made, and the public mind duly prepared according >to the rules already laid down, it will be proper to venture on >another and a bolder step toward a removal of the constitutional >landmarks. Here the aid of the former encroachments and all the >other precedents and way-paving maneuvers will be called in of >course. But, in order to render the success more certain, it >will be of special moment to give the most plausible and popular >name that can be found to the power that is to be usurped. It >may be called, for example, a power for the common safety or the >public good, or, "the general welfare." If the people should not >be too much enlightened, the name will have a most imposing >effect. It will escape attention that it means, in fact, the >same thing with a power to do anything the government pleases "in >all cases whatsoever." To oppose the power may consequently seem >to the ignorant, and be called by artful, opposing the "general >welfare", and may be cried down under that deception. > > As the people, however, may not run so readily into the >snare as might be wished, it will be prudent to bait it well with >some specious popular interest, such as the encouragement of >manufactures, or even of agriculture, taking due care not even to >mention any unpopular object to which the power is equally >applicable, such as religion, etc. By this contrivance, >particular classes of people may possibly be taken in who will be >a valuable reinforcement. > > With respect to the patronage of agriculture there is not >indeed much to be expected from it. It will be too quickly seen >through by the owners and tillers of the soil, that to tax them >with one hand and pay back a part only with the other is a losing >game on their side. From the power over manufactures more is to >be hoped. It will not be so easily perceived that the premium >bestowed may not be equal to the circuitous tax on consumption >which pays it. There are particular reasons, too, for pushing >the experiment on this class of citizens: > > >(1) As they live in towns and can act together, it is of vast > consequence to gain them over to the interest of monarchy. > >(2) If the power over them be once established, the government > can grant favors or monopolies, as it pleases; can raise or > depress this or that place, as it pleases; in a word, by > creating a dependence in so numerous and important a class > of citizens, it will increase its own independence of every > class and be more free to pursue the grand object in > contemplation. > >(3) The expense of this operation will not in the end cost the > government a shilling, for the moment any branch of > manufacture has been brought to a state of tolerable > maturity, the excise man will be ready with his constable > and his search warrant to demand a reimbursement, and as > much more as can be squeezed out of the article. All this, > it is to be remembered, supposes that the manufacturers will > be weak enough to be cheated, in some respects, out of their > own interests, and wicked enough, in others, to betray those > of their fellow citizens; a supposition that, if known, > would totally mar the experiment. Great care, therefore, > must be taken to prevent it from leaking out. > > > 12. The expediency of seizing every occasion of external >danger for augmenting and perpetuating the standing military >force is too obvious to escape. So important is this matter that >for any loss or disaster whatever attending the national arms, >there will be ample consolation and compensation in the >opportunity for enlarging the establishment. A military defeat >will become a political victory, and the loss of a little vulgar >blood contribute to ennoble that which flows in the veins of our >future dukes and marquesses. > > 13. The same prudence will improve the opportunity afforded >by an increase of military expenditures for perpetuating the >taxes required for them. If the inconsistency and absurdity of >establishing a perpetual tax for a temporary service should >produce any difficulty in the business, Rule 10 must be resorted >to. Throw in as many extraneous motives as will make up a >majority, and the thing is effected in an instant. What was >before evil would become good as easily as black could be made >white by the same magical operation. > > 14. Throughout this great undertaking it will be wise to >have some particular model constantly in view. The work can then >be carried on more systematically, and every measure be >fortified, in the progress, by apt illustrations and authorities. >Should there exist a particular monarchy against which there are >fewer prejudices than against any other, should it contain a >mixture of the representative principle so as to present on one >side the semblance of a republican aspect, should it, moreover, >have a great, funded, complicated, irredeemable debt, with all >the apparatus and appurtenances of excises, banks, etc., upon >that a steady eye is to be kept. In all cases it will assist, >and in most its statute books will furnish a precise pattern by >which there may be cut out any moneyed or monarchical project >that may be wanted. > > 15. As it is not to be expected that the change of a >republic into a monarchy, with the rapidity desired, can be >carried through without occasional suspicions and alarms, it will >be necessary to be prepared for such events. The best general >rule on the subject is to be taken from the example of crying >"Stop thief" first -- neither lungs nor pens must be spared in >charging every man who whispers, or even thinks, that the >revolution on foot is meditated, with being himself an enemy to >the established government and meaning to overturn it. Let the >charge be reiterated and reverberated till at last such confusion >and uncertainty be produced that the people, being not able to >find out where the truth lies, withdraw their attention from the >contest. > > Many other rules of great wisdom and efficacy might be >added; but it is conceived that the above will be abundantly >enough for the purpose. This will certainly be the case if the >people can be either kept asleep so as not to discover, or be >thrown into artificial divisions so as not to resist, what is >silently going forward. Should it be found impossible, however, >to prevent the people from awaking and uniting; should all >artificial distinctions give way to the natural divisions between >the lordly minded few and the well disposed many; should all who >have common interest make a common cause and show a inflexible >attachment to republicanism in opposition to a government of >monarchy and or money, why then .... > > > # # # > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0 on 80586 CPU ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail