Time: Tue Jun 03 06:02:17 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA16572;
	Tue, 3 Jun 1997 05:46:59 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 05:43:50 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: 26 CFR 9.22(b)-1  [1939]
 sgsrv99.srv.pacbell.com>

I cited several of those in "The Federal Zone."
You raise a very good point here, however,
if and when an "old" regulation simply drops
off the books.  

It makes you wonder, doesn't it?

I have a brief discussion of the legal force
and effect of regulations, in one of the letters
found in Appendix P of "The Federal Zone." 
I will see if I can dig it up for you.

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com


At 08:44 AM 6/2/97 -0700, you wrote:
>What is the general rule when examining different year versions of
>26CFR?
>
>The 1939 version has a section I cannot find in the current version: 26
>CFR 9.22(b)-1, provides for excluding from 'gross income' any 'income'
>that is constituionally excluded from the term 'income'.  i.e. fair
>compensation for labor (property).
>
>Are the sections not in the current 26 CFR repealed?  
>
>How does the IRS treat the 1939 CFR?  


========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================


      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail