Time: Fri Jun 13 13:00:07 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA26546; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:30:09 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:29:04 -0700 To: heritage-l@gate.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLF: OPENING BRIEF, U.S.A. v. Gilbertson, 8th Cir. At 12:14 PM 6/13/97 -0400, you wrote: >Paul, > >Per your previous message, this does show how messages posted >can be made easier to read. And all should try to improve their >format of possible. Thank you. We have rejected all Windows-based word processors, to settle back on WORD for DOS, Version 5.0B, a truly fast, efficient, and reliable program, if ever there was one. Using this version of WORD, we use the "bug screen" model: look at any screen door, and look at the pattern formed by the horizontal and vertical wires in the screen. This is a character matrix, which we fill with equally spaced Courier 12 characters -- same font as you get in DOS EDIT. We like to think of this screen as a Window Screen -- it screens out Windows. :) /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com p.s. Bill Gates forgot how to do memory management. > >But the subject of this suit is very interesting, is this a >suit to modify or radically change our beloved blood suckers >at the IRS? Yes. The Defendant was convicted of falsifying a federal income tax return. Among the many briefs we prepared for him was a NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE of the genealogy of the IRS, via Trust #62 in Puerto Rico. U.S. Attorneys fell silent, again! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com > >Mike Crane > > >> >> Excerpt from Appellant's OPENING BRIEF, due June 18, 1997, >> U.S.A. v. Gilbertson, Gilbertson v. U.S. et al. >> United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, >> Case Number #97-2099-MNST >> >> [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> >> >> Appellant submits that the vagueness and ambiguities which >> >> were introduced deliberately into the federal income tax system >> >> have resulted in a set of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, >> >> forms, practices, policies, procedures, and customs which are so >> >> terribly complex and intentionally deceptive, that the average >> >> federal citizen is very far from ever being able to understand, >> >> or decipher, the real meaning and intent of it all. These were >> >> the very same persons who were asked to render a verdict against >> >> Appellant in the instant case. Lex non cogit impossibilia. >> >> The combined result of this massive fraud is a travesty and >> >> a tragedy of the worst kind, because Appellant has succeeded in >> >> proving herein that there are, in fact, more than two hundred >> >> million Americans who find themselves situated in exactly the >> >> same position as Appellant. And that position is one in which >> >> the American People must now struggle daily, hourly, sometimes >> >> minute-by-minute, in the face of an ugly and premeditated >> >> extortion racket which now pervades the entire Land (both zones), >> >> in blatant violation of the fundamental principles which were set >> >> down more than two centuries ago in the supreme Law of this Land. >> >> Those principles have withstood every single challenge which >> >> has been mounted against their supremacy since they were first >> >> consecrated into Law on June 21, 1788, the first day of summer, >> >> the longest day of the year, Counselor's birthday, and the first >> >> day on which freedom had, at long last, become The Primary >> >> Principle upon which Our unique government was founded and >> >> dedicated, the day on which God's generous light from His intense >> >> burning Sun would shine the longest, and remain that way forever. >> >> Freedom. Oh, Freedom! Quo vadis, Freedom? Quo vadis? >> >> As against these immensely moving principles, which federal >> >> government employees now shirk at their own great loss, Appellant >> >> returns to the incredibly accurate prediction in Justice Harlan's >> >> courageous protest to the dangerous perils of the Downes Doctrine >> >> in Downes v. Bidwell infra. Long live protest! Quoting now: >> >> The idea prevails with some -- indeed, it found expression >> in arguments at the bar -- that we have in this country >> substantially or practically two national governments; one, >> to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its >> restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress >> outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising >> such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to >> exercise. >> [Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 at 380 (1901)] >> [Harlan dissenting, emphasis added] >> >> To appreciate how alarmed Justice Harlan had become as a result >> >> of this new "theory", consider the following from His dissent: >> >> I take leave to say that if the principles thus announced >> should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this >> court, a radical and mischievous change in our system of >> government will be the result. We will, in that event, pass >> from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected >> by a written constitution into an era of legislative >> absolutism. ... >> >> It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of >> a government outside of the supreme law of the land finds >> lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher >> duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority >> to prevent all violation of the principles of the >> Constitution. >> >> [Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 at 379-382] >> [(1901), Harlan dissenting, emphasis added] >> >> The United States will now take careful note that We, the >> >> People of the United States of America, will not sit idly by, and >> >> witness the systematic destruction and premeditated violation of >> >> everything which We hold most dear. The principles We uphold >> >> herein, have been upheld by many courts of this great Nation; >> >> they were reiterated in People v. Boxer supra as follows: >> >> A practice condemned by the Constitution cannot be saved by >> historical acceptance and present convenience. >> >> [U.S. v. Woodley, 726 F.2d 1328, 1338 (9th Cir. 1984)] >> [emphasis added] >> >> It is obviously correct that no one acquires a vested or >> protected right in violation of the Constitution by long >> use, even when that span of time covers our entire national >> existence and indeed predates it. >> >> [Walz v. Tax Commission of New York City,] >> [397 U.S. 664 at 678 (1970), emphasis added] >> >> >> # # # >> >> >> ======================================================================== >> Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness >> B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine >> >> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night >> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU >> website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this >> >> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall >> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. >> ======================================================================== >> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail