Time: Sun Jun 15 20:20:29 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA13186; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:20:15 -0700 (MST) by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA12082; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:19:55 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:18:34 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: The Hamaker Hypothesis (7 of 7) [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] Alternative 3 and the Global Warming Hypothesis by John E. Trumane May 14, 1991 Introduction The following is a montage assembled to introduce this topic on a teleconferencing system known as the Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link (WELL), an electronic bulletin board located in Sausalito, California. By normal standards on the WELL, this montage is unusually long, in order to cover adequately a subject that is complex, contemporary, shocking, and challenging. Is planet Earth in real trouble? The global warming hypothesis now has scientists scattering in opposite directions, desperately trying to deal with mounting evidence, using inadequate theories that are untested and maybe untestable. From a past that now seems distant, the American literary underground has unearthed _Alternative 3_, a work by Leslie Watkins that has been banned in the United States ever since its publication in 1979. Based on the work of scientists who were convinced, at that time, the planet was doomed to overheat, _Alternative 3_ makes a number of startling revelations that were hardly believable then, and are still unbelievable now. >From the back cover of this controversial book, witness the following: FACT: The Earth's atmosphere is becoming super-heated and unbreathable. If this trend is not reversed, life on Earth is doomed. ALTERNATIVE 1: Blast "chimneys" in the stratosphere with nuclear weapons, releasing heat and pollution. Project status: abandoned. ALTERNATIVE 2: Relocate Earth's population in massive underground caverns, drawing fresh, cool air from the soil. Project status: abandoned. ALTERNATIVE 3: A bold venture into space built on revolutionary technology. Officially-sanctioned murder, and a secret international conspiracy. Project status: unknown. Clues to the existence of Alternative 3 encircle the globe and stretch millions of miles into space: Top scientists vanish without a trace. Transmissions from the moon switch to secret frequencies hiding astronauts' frantic pleas. Transcripts of submarine conferences between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. detailing murder "contracts" Coded NASA tapes of a Mars landing on May 22, 1962 But each fact is only a fragment of the awesome enigma that is Alternative 3 -- a super-secret conspiracy between America and Russia. Under the cover of nearly three decades of detente and the Cold War smokescreen, this massive and terrifying project was conceived -- the ultimate power grab by the super-powers. And today it is being implemented ... the kidnappings, murders, and experiments have begun. Now, if that isn't tantalizing enough, a page from inside the book goes even further: These are the strands in a web of conspiracy so monstrous the human mind can scarcely grasp its true enormity: The frightenly erratic behavior of the climate over the last few years. The sudden, dramatic rise in UFO activity. Astounding revelations of clandestine collaboration in space between the USA and the USSR over a period of decades. Bizarre features observed on the Moon and Mars -- but for some reason barely mentioned in the media. Mounting evidence of unexplained disappearances of scientists throughout the world. These are just a few of the sinister clues to the terrifying, top secret plan unearthed in this courageous book. Piece by piece, investigative journalist Leslie Watkins and the research team that produced the shocking and controversial British television documentary, ALTERNATIVE 3, have assembled the true story behind a shared secret that both America and Russia are ruthlessly obsessed with guarding -- but that they can no longer keep silent. [from _Alternative 3_, published by Avon Books, 959 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10019, June 1979] Surely, this must be science fiction. Calling it a true story must have been an advertising gimmick. What's the verdict? Evidence from the underground is chilling. One investigator entered a large public library on the East Coast of the United States and requested a copy of the book. The librarian asked him to wait a moment, while she summoned the head librarian. In no uncertain terms, the head librarian informed him that the book was not available and "You don't want to read this book." Was this enough to turn the tide of opinion against a fiction, in favor of fact? Perhaps. Perhaps not. Read on. The story has now erupted above ground, in establishment media. A recent leak from the Strategic Defense Initiative reveals hitherto secret plans to develop mighty rockets propelled by jets of hot gas from nuclear reactors. The planned thrusts of these rockets are many times the current capabilities of the largest chemical rockets. The nuclear rocket plans were so startling, they prompted the following editorial in, of all places, the April 5, 1991 issue of the _San Francisco Chronicle_: ROCKET CONCERNS The notion of powerful rockets propelled by jets of hot gas from nuclear reactors naturally inspires the same scientific and political concerns that greeted the space-based lasers and other directed-energy weapons associated with the Star Wars defense program. But while most of those early Strategic Defense Initiative proposals have long since been scaled back to more realistic alternatives, the top secret "Timberwind" nuclear rocket project has moved from the drawing boards to the "bending metal" stage of development. The revelations of the project's existence raise a number of critical questions: * If the SDI Office (SDIO) has indeed scaled down its space-based visions to land-based alternatives, what mission exists for a nuclear-propelled rocket? "Unless SDIO is going to Mars, it has no need for this technology," said Steven Aftergood, the Federation of American Scientists analyst who revealed the project. * If the rocket is designed for interplanetary travel rather than Star Wars, then why all the secrecy? NASA has considered many nuclear rocket proposals, all of which have been open to public and congressional discussion. * Most important, how can the proposed atmospheric flight-testing of the Timberwind rocket be reconciled with the sensible and long-standing U.S. government policy against the operation of space-based nuclear reactors below a stable space orbit? Even if space- based reactors represent little safety risk, as some experts claim, the operation of reactors aboard rockets flying in Earth's atmosphere unquestionably raises serious safety concerns. Before too many more millions of tax dollars are invested in the Timberwind project, the public deserves some answers. [_San Francisco Chronicle_, April 5, 1991, p. A-22] Is Timberwind just another cover for Alternative 3? Hopefully time will tell, if we still have any time left. The other side of this global controversy is the ice age prediction of John Hamaker, a mechanical engineer from Purdue. Hamaker agrees that the Greenhouse Effect is a reality. Taking advantage of newer research and his own unique perspective on the problem, Hamaker also agrees that global warming will occur, but the distribution of heat will not be uniform. The equatorial latitudes will warm faster because the sun's rays are more vertical. The polar latitudes will warm slower because the sun's rays are more slanted. This heat differential sets in motion a long chain of ecological events, the connections among which are insights that originate in Hamaker's brain and apparently not in establishment meteorology. The added heat at the equator accelerates the evaporation of ocean water. This water vapor ascends quickly and convects to the nearest pole on winds that travel high in the atmosphere. As it moves, the water vapor precipitates out as heavy rains over mid-latitudes, and eventually as ice and snow over the polar latitudes. By releasing its moisture, the dry air is thus cooled and falls back towards Earth, gaining velocity and losing temperature as it heads for the equator on winds that travel low in the atmosphere. This pattern of winds is called a Hadley Cell, a technical term well known to meteorologists. The resulting thermodynamic system is powerful enough to transport gigatons of ocean water to the poles, causing a massive buildup of polar ice and snow, enormous pressure on existing glaciers, increased earthquake and volcanic activity as tectonic plates adjust, and eventually the onset of a full blown Ice Age. The time frame: 20 years. We may already be 10 years into the transition. Hamaker's thesis ties together a large number of ecological phenomena that are brilliantly explained in a film produced by the late Dr. Larry Ephron. The following film review was published in _Katuah Journal_ in the Spring of 1989: "Stopping the Coming Ice Age" Directed by Larry Ephron Produced by People for a Future Looking back, it seems that 1988 was _the_ year for important, "new" environmental issues and concerns to surface. In particular, this was the year in which the idea of the so-called "greenhouse effect" finally gained public acceptance, if not notoriety -- a year that saw record- breaking drought, hurricanes, and forest fires. Suddenly, the idea of global warming was appearing everywhere in the media, and it seemed that concerned scientists and politicians were unanimous in their support for the global warming scenario. However, this unanimity is an illusion, media coverage to the contrary. In fact, there is much controversy within the scientific community as to the climatic effects and socio- political ramifications of the greenhouse effect. It is far from certain that the climate changes we're seeing are leading to or caused by global warming. In fact, there is actually considerable evidence that points to a very different conclusion: that the planet may be teetering on the brink of another Ice Age. One of the foremost proponents of this latter view is John Hamaker, a mechanical engineer who has extensively analyzed climate and ecological patterns, and has developed a comprehensive and holistic approach to understanding global climate change. His theories, expressed in his book _The Survival of Civilization_, are now being supported and disseminated by a foundation called "People for a Future" which recently created a remarkable video presentation: "Stopping the Coming Ice Age." This video is inspiring, frightening, challenging and very informative, as it takes us around the world in search of answers. While Hamaker agrees that the greenhouse effect is a very real threat, he believes -- and backs this up with hard data and expert opinion -- that it will _not_ warm the Earth uniformly, but instead will increase the temperature _differential_ between the equator and the poles, causing increased thermal convection, atmospheric turbulence, and rapidly shifting and bizarre weather patterns. In this scenario, high winds moving from the equator towards the poles will drop their abundant moisture in the higher latitudes in the form of snow and ice, often creating drought conditions in the temperate regions. He believes that the tropical and sub-tropical zones will indeed get hotter, but the temperate zones are likely to get cooler and drier. Hamaker's understanding of the greenhouse effect takes us far beyond the popularized, watered-down information available through the mass media, because he explores deeper levels of cause and effect, process and purpose. The most profound information presented in this video concerns the connections between the greenhouse effect and the development of an ice age, and the importance of understanding long-term cycles (100,000 years!) of climate change. The video demonstrates the causal connections linking together all the different environmental/ atmospheric phenomena that combine to bring on an ice age: (1) soil erosion and demineralization (2) the subsequent weakening and dying of the forests (3) the resulting increase in insect infestations, forest decay, and massive forest fires (4) the dramatic increase in carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by these natural causes, which induces the greenhouse effect (5) and in the 20th century -- as opposed to 100,000 years ago -- man-made pollution and our destructive tampering with the natural balance of life are intensifying and hastening the process. According to Hamaker, an ice age performs a vitally necessary natural function. As the glaciers advance and then retreat, they move and grind up immense quantities of rock, thus spreading gravel and rock dust over much of the temperate zones. This process, along with the winds that help distribute this rock dust even further, gradually remineralizes the soil -- which feeds the plants and forests, promoting rapid and healthy growth -- during which time the plants breathe in much of the excess carbon dioxide, use the carbon, and release the oxygen back into the air which we and all other animals breathe! Thus, a primary function of glaciation is to remineralize and help reforest the Earth. The reason this video is called "Stopping the Coming Ice Age" is that Hamaker thinks we humans can -- indeed must, if we want our civilization to survive -- remineralize the Earth _ourselves_. We ourselves can fulfill the vital role played by an ice age, rendering such a geological event obsolete. This means, however, that the governments and peoples of all countries and regions would need to make it a top priority to remineralize our depleted soils, and also to engage in massive reforestation projects, planting billions of trees worldwide. Without healthy forests, we have no chance at all of slowing the tremendous buildup of carbon dioxide which fuels the greenhouse effect. As the video puts it, "The trees of the world are our best friends now, and only they can save us." Obviously, then, we also need to stop clear-cutting our forests, both here and in the tropics, and to limit our fossil fuel burning, which has been accelerating the greenhouse process. Only by doing all these things, says Hamaker, can we avoid horrific consequences for humanity in the very near future. The audacity of this theory and this proposal lies in its utter simplicity and common-sense quality. Yet, many people may not heed Hamaker's message and information because we have become so enamored of "high-tech" solutions and short- term planning, gratification and profit. Hamaker's plan demands a clear understanding of our planetary dilemma, and a deep commitment to creating a viable future, as well as some sacrifice of comfort and convenience. The video concludes with these questions: "Have we got the guts to do it? How much do we really want to be here?" Whether or not Hamaker's proposal is ever implemented on a large scale, we can all do things individually and collectively to help educate people and help heal the planet. The video points out that, even if these theories are not totally "provable", or even completely accurate, we should _still_ do the things that Hamaker suggests, for the sake of ecological balance, conservation, and planetary sanity. In addition to the ideas discussed in this review, this video explores _many_ other aspects of our ecological and social dilemmas -- many more than can be dealt with here. There is so much vital information presented, within such a comprehensive framework, that this video ranks as a definite "must see" for anyone at all concerned about environmental issues and social change. There is a breathtaking simplicity to the Hamaker thesis: the mass of carbon we see in trees comes from the air, and not from the ground. This insight was given to me by a humming bird, who looked me in the eye just inches from my nose, passed the word on a medium of psychic energy, and died soon after in a killing frost, the worst I have ever seen anywhere in California. Was this a warning? No sooner have reality and fiction changed places, when _Life_ magazine enters the fray. The May 1991 issue carries a cover story entitled "Our Next Home, Mars: Bringing a Dead World to Life." In a sequence of stunning photographs and equally provocative text, _Life_ editors are bold enough to pose the big question: Can a dead world be brought to life? and to provide a host of credible answers: "The greening of the red planet may be the next giant step for mankind." The first earthlings will arrive on Mars between the years 2015 and 2030. Are these dates realistic, or is _Life_ magazine deliberately trying to manipulate the news? Is _Life_ even aware of _Alternative 3_? Are George Bush and the other power elites preparing to abandon planet Earth? What would happen if the Secret Government came out in the open for a change? These are the many questions we will explore in this conference: Alternative 3 and the Global Warming Hypothesis # # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail