Time: Tue Jun 24 09:02:56 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA06637; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 09:02:19 -0700 (MST) by usr10.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA18329; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 09:02:04 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 09:00:26 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: 8th Circuit Ruling upheld <snip> > > U.S. high court rejects White House notes appeal > > by James Vicini > > WASHINGTON (Reuter) - The Supreme Court dealt the White >House a major defeat Monday, effectively requiring it to give >Whitewater prosecutors notes lawyers took during discussions >with Hillary Rodham Clinton. > > The high court rejected a White House appeal, letting stand >a U.S. appeals court ruling that attorney-client privilege did >not apply to the notes, subpoenaed by Whitewater independent >counsel Kenneth Starr as part of a grand jury investigation. > > The action was taken without any explanation or dissent and >means that the notes, which have been at the center of a long >legal battle, will have to be turned over. It represents a major >setback for the White House, the first lady and the Justice >Department, all of which urged the high court to hear the case >and rule that attorney-client privilege applied. > > Starr has conducted a long investigation into Whitewater, a >complex web of Arkansas business deals involving the Clintons, >and into allegations of a later coverup. President > Clinton and his wife have not been accused of wrongdoing. > > The White House immediately expressed regret that its appeal >had been unsuccessful. > > ``We continue to believe that government lawyers must be >allowed to have confidential discussions with their clients if >they are able to provide candid and effective legal advice,'' >White House counsel Charles Ruff said in a statement. > > ``We regret that the court has decided not to resolve this >important issue,'' he said. > > The Supreme Court's denial of the appeal marked Clinton's >second stinging defeat in less than a month. The high court >ruled unanimously last month that Paula Jones' sexual harassment >lawsuit against Clinton could go forward rather than being put >on hold until he left office. > > The Whitewater case involved conversations Hillary Clinton >had on July 11, 1995, and Jan. 26, 1996. White House lawyers >took notes while she talked with her private Whitewater >attorney, David Kendall. > > The 1995 notes related to her actions after the suicide of >White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster, who previously worked >with her at a Little Rock law firm. The 1996 notes dealt with >her testimony before a federal grand jury that day about her law >firm's billing records for work she did for a failing savings >and loan company owned by her Whitewater partner. > > The billing records, missing for a time, mysteriously >reappeared in the White House family residence and were not >turned over to Whitewater prosecutors until two years after >being subpoenaed. According to court papers filed earlier, >prosecutors described Hillary Clinton as a central figure in the >probe and said she had changed her testimony in the course of >the lengthy investigation. > > Attorneys representing her and the White House appealed to >the Supreme Court, saying the long-standing legal doctrine of >attorney-client privilege protected the notes. > > The appeal was supported by the Justice Department and by a >group of former White House counsels and other top lawyers from >Democratic and Republican administrations. They said the Court >of Appeals ruling requiring the notes' surrender could prevent >the president and other government officials from seeking full >and frank advice from their lawyers. > > Starr argued that the appeal should be denied. He said that >the White House had already turned over similar notes on >communications between government attorneys and White House >officials and that granting the White House appeal would delay >his investigation for as long as a year. > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail