Time: Sun Jun 29 15:24:28 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA06191;
	Sun, 29 Jun 1997 15:22:57 -0700 (MST)
	by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA18893;
	Sun, 29 Jun 1997 15:22:50 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 1997 15:21:10 -0700
To: bigal123@Juno.com (Bill D bradley)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: "individual" and state Citizenship 

Not according to Treasury Decision 2313.

YOU may be living in a British colony,
but I am not.  

That's for sure!

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com



At 06:02 PM 6/29/97 EDT, you wrote:
>Dear Paul,
>	Your answer to the question where the term "individual" is to be
>found is in Title 5 USC 552a  A 2 which is described in my book on pages
>11, 21, 51, 52 and 74 of the New History of America.  Yes, we are still a
>British Colony and NO the states were never free but the people were
>declared Sovereign.  BUT, in order for the states to pay back the debt
>they had to devise a way to bring the sovereigns back into the fold to
>help pay the back debt to the Crown.  Hence the voter ploy to register
>you so you can have a representitive to show that you came under Article
>1, Sec 2. Cl.3   so that you could be taxed/ controlled when the debt got
>to much  the states could not pay the Crown.
>
>This book shows how being a "State citizen" throws you into the joint
>venture with the "state of So & So" that binds you to contract with the
>Treaty the U.S. and states made with the Crown to pay the debt to the
>Crown that is protected by Article six of the U.S. Constitution.  Now you
>know why the fed tax form is called an "individual" tax Form.  It is not
>the law that you are charged with it is the tax Form  (contract) that you
>sign.  The district courts, being administrative agencies of the Congress
>are also maritime courts merely  adjudicating  a Notice of a contract
>under maritime principles making your actions of defense come under
>estopple in pais.  There is no judicial court determination, only
>administrative courts of Congress.  However, you can challange the agency
>by going to the court of original jurisdiction under 5 USCS 706, Note 6
>to challange the agency procedure and the like.  It is not a tax case and
>a three panel judge is to here the matter.
>                                                                         
>          Big Al
>
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]

      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail