Time: Fri Jul 04 07:17:02 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA27540; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 07:18:27 -0700 (MST) by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA22995; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 07:18:20 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 04 Jul 1997 07:16:35 -0700 To: fwolist@sportsmen.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: provisions for coining money If you regard the U.S. Constitution as a grant of _enumerated_ powers, then it does not authorize the United States to issue paper money, particularly when that money is not redeemable in gold or silver. Think: AUTHORITY AUTHORITY AUTHORITY Did the People grant to the United States the authority to issue paper money? I don't think so. It cannot even be inferred, via the "implied powers" doctrine. The sections dealing with the coining of money, and restraining the several states, should not be construed as a "grant" of authority to the United States to issue paper money. On the contrary, the absence of such an authority is all you need to know. The master of this subject is Dr. Edwin J. Vieira, Jr. You MUST read his "Return to Constitutional Money," before you will be more than a bystander in this important debate. Congress MUST recall Federal Reserve Notes, at par, and print enough U.S. Notes for the recall to be effected within 12 months, say. "At par" means "one-for-one," no prejudice. U.S. Notes must be printed thereafter without creating ANY bogus liens, evidenced by equally bogus bonds which Congress sells to the Federal Reserve, for 3 cents on the dollar. What a RACKET!! It is time to stop this insanity. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 06:55 AM 7/4/97 -0700, you wrote: >================[ Distributed Message ]================ > ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order) > Type: Not Moderated > Distributed on: 04-JUL-97, 06:55:06 >Original Written by: IN:csharp@mindspring.com. >======================================================= > > >fwolist@sportsmen.net said on 7/3/97 11:47 AM: > >>How about provisons allowing the use of the treaty power IN SECRET. > >This is another example of an imperfection...I'll >be the first to admit that the treaty clause is not >worded very well, but it has been adjudicated very >well in a number of cases, and very poorly in others. > >>Patrick Henry proposed about 40 amendments to the Constitution. They were >>all needed. > >He is my favorite of the founders... > >>Look at the few words on accounting for spending in the Constitution. >>Then you will understand the state of the budget. > >Again, the sections dealing with the coining of money was >poorly worded, not for the times that they were written, >but for a lack of understanding of how ignorant people >would willingly become in the future. > >There should have been a clause that forbid the Federal Government >from making anything but gold and silver coin a tender in >payment of debts as well, but at the time, it was ludicrous to >even suggest that this was NOT STRICTLY a state OBLIGATION. > > > > >In the pursuit of Liberty and Truth, > >Charles > > > >======================================================================== >To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net >with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems? > email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net >For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net > >======================================================================== >via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail