Time: Fri Jul 04 12:28:05 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA01317;
	Fri, 4 Jul 1997 12:13:33 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 15:13:11 -0400
Originator: heritage-l@gate.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
To: pmitch@primenet.com
Subject: indirect tax?  yes, according to Brushaber!

7
>	I assure you that you will not ever win any fight with your false
>argument that
>income taxes are in the class of indirect taxation.


The Brushaber court held that income taxes are indirect,
because 1:2:3 and 1:9:4 were never repealed by the so-called
16th amendment [sic].  The Constitution cannot contradict 
itself.  C.J. White was adamant about this in Brushaber.

Moreover, repeals by implication are not favored.

Other courts have held that income taxes are direct,
Pollock being the most famous, and most pertinent,
because Pollock was a state Citizen.

Since the 16th amendment was never ratified, 
Pollock is now controlling.

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com

========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]

      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail