Time: Mon Jul 07 13:49:30 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA07804
for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:26:08 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To: liberty-and-justice-outgoing@majordomo.pobox.com
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 13:25:07 -0700
To: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: L&J: AN EXPLICIT CHALLENGE FROM JOSEPH NEWMAN
References: <3.0.3.16.19970707031825.3297cf4a@pop.primenet.com>
These are excellent points.
The scientific method requires testable hypotheses.
And replication is essential. To engineer mass
application of such a technology, the key to
replication must be plainly evident, on blueprints,
where the rubber meets the road. Boeing 747's are
a good example of mass production of aerodynamic
lift, the same lift which propels a sailboat
on an up-wind tack.
It is my belief, however, that energy has been
so monopolized by foreign special interests,
like the oil cartel, dating from Prohibition
(a ruse to give that cartel an unfair advantage
over commerce in automotive fuels), that the
U.S. government is unlikely to fund the proper
comparative research, even though they have
federal research labs scattered all over the
landscape, like Lawrence Livermore and
Lawrence Berkeley Labs, to name just two.
There are many others.
Somebody needs to get into Congress to fight,
and fight hard, to make these appropriations
happen, come what may. I thought George Brown
was going to do that, but I have been mostly
disappointed by him.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 11:28 AM 7/7/97 -0600, you wrote:
>As your recipient list is suppressed, you are welcome to
>forward this as appropriate.
>
>I am glad that the photographer and her husband treated
>you well. I agree that Mr. Newman's work would be very
>significant if verified. Since it appears to violate the
>laws of thermodynamics, starting with conservation of
>energy, Mr. Joseph Westley Newman has a considerable,
>and justified, wall of skepticism to overcome for his
>alleged inventions to be seriously considered or
>accepted. This requires independent examination of
>working models, and a physical theory to explain the
>source of the energy and the working principles of
>these inventions. Lacking such a (verifiable) theory,
>testing of the working models must be especially
>vigorous to exclude trickery. I would think this would
>also require that it be possible for others to also
>build and run working models, using their own materials,
>and without Mr. Newman's presence.
>
>On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>
>> I am afraid I must side with Mr. Newman
>> in this debate. I have had the very good
>> fortune to meet the video photographer
>> who was given exclusive filming rights for
>> one of Newman's expositions. She and her
>> husband demonstrated extraordinary kindness
>> to me, personally, after my accountant
>> embezzled $3,000 from me, stole my backup
>> JAZ disk (1.0GB), and stole a one-ounce
>> gold piece I had entrusted to him to avoid
>> having valuables around the house.
>>
>> They flew me to Texas on their own funds,
>> and allowed me to sleep long enough to recover
>> from exhaustion. Their house was filled with love,
>> and plenty of domestic animals of all sorts,
>> and it was such a beautiful experience, meeting
>> these two generous, kind, and loving people,
>> whose every room was so beautifully appointed
>> with original art work and details everywhere.
>> Even the animals were respectful of my state
>> of exhaustion; one orange tabby cat would
>> sleep with me, just inches away from my head,
>> and purr into my ear to comfort me.
>>
>> Now, during my rare waking hours at their ranch,
>> the wife of this lovely couple, who is an
>> eclectic genius in her own right, sat me down
>> to view one of the uncut videotapes of her
>> coverage of this Newman exposition. It would
>> be an insult to the intelligence of everyone
>> who attended this important exposition even to
>> ask if the machine is a fraud. It was there,
>> working, and creating mechanical motion in a
>> large, rotating device. Close-ups of Newman
>> revealed a kind, sincere, and obviously
>> intelligent man who is beginning to feel the
>> impact of government tyranny directly upon
>> his important work. When I tell you that the
>> United States is a criminal enterprise, you need
>> only peer into the eyes of this brilliant inventor,
>> to understand how he is one with Copernicus,
>> Galileo, and Einstein for the senseless and
>> self-serving opposition which he is now getting
>> from every corner, including of course the
>> Internet.
>>
>> I am sorry, Mr. Poley, but I have learned to
>> avoid your emotional outbursts here on the net,
>> because that's all they are. If and when you
>> should make a contribution to mankind as
>> significant as Mr. Newman's, then I might once
>> again begin to read your words here, but I would
>> expect that, by that time, your tone and content
>> would have changed so much, that you might as
>> well have changed your name along with them.
>>
>> If you want to flame me for these comments,
>> don't let me stop you. You will just cement
>> forever what I have just said, by doing so.
>>
>> If I were in Congress right now, I would make
>> as one of my highest priorities, a national
>> program to publicize Mr. Newman's work, and
>> the work of others like him, on a scale comparable
>> to NASA's Apollo project. In my opinion, once a
>> national concensus is reached, ten years would
>> be more than enough to re-engineer this entire
>> nation with "free" energy devices, and then we
>> would see an economic renaissance like none that
>> has ever existed anywhere on planet Earth.
>>
>> To this end, I will dedicate my efforts to serve
>> the American People in the Congress of the
>> United States, God willing.
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>>
>>
>> At 08:51 PM 7/6/97 -0600, you wrote:
>> >
>> >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>> >
>> >July 6, 1997
>> >
>> >To Mr. Franklin Wayne Poley:
>> >
>> >The following is an explicit challenge to you:
>> >
>> >"IF YOU HAVE ANY GUTS AND HONOR YOU WILL BACK UP YOUR PUBLIC ACCUSATIONS
>> >AND CLAIMS REGARDING MY TECHNOLOGY BY PUBLICLY POSTING YOUR PERSONAL
>> >PHYSICAL ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER. I INTEND TO SUE ANYONE WHO ISSUES
>> >FALSE ACCUSATIONS AND CLAIMS REGARDING MYSELF AND/OR MY WORK. IF YOU
>> >REFUSE TO PROVIDE THE ABOVE, THEN YOUR CREDIBILITY IS WORTHLESS."
>> >
>> >
>> >My physical address and telephone number:
>> >
>> >Joseph Westley Newman
>> >Route 1, Box 52, Lucedale, Mississippi 39452
>> >(601) 947-7147
>> >
>> >
>> >Joseph Westley Newman
>> >[signed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>> >-> Posted by: josephnewman@earthlink.net (Evan Soule)
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail