Time: Sun Jul 13 16:07:12 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12090; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 16:06:16 -0700 (MST) by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA29124; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 16:06:09 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 16:05:50 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: WOODWARD: FBI Cleared China Funds Revelation (fwd) <snip> > >FBI Cleared China Funds Revelation >Sen. Thompson Says No Dispute on Facts > >By Bob Woodward >Washington Post Staff Writer >Sunday, July 13, 1997; Page A01 >The Washington Post > >Sen. Fred D. Thompson (R-Tenn.) says his decision to begin >campaign finance hearings last week by confirming reports of >a Chinese political influence-buying plan came after aides >spent hundreds of hours reviewing sensitive information on the >matter. > >Executive branch sources said that Thompson's statement was >cleared late Monday by the FBI, the CIA and the National >Security Agency, a day before he read it at the opening of his >hearings. > >Thompson, who chairs the fund-raising probe, said in an >interview Friday that the information -- which executive >branch sources said included highly classified communications >intercepts -- has been made available to all members of his >Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, but that only some >have examined it. FBI Director Louis J. Freeh was involved in >clearing the information, executive branch sources said. > >"There is no dispute about the facts among anyone who looks >at the documents," Thompson said. > >In his statement at the hearings Tuesday, Thompson said the >committee believed "that high-level Chinese government >officials crafted a plan to increase China's influence over the >U.S. political process," and took "specific steps" to do so, >including the allocation of "substantial sums of money" to >influence federal and state elections. > >"Our investigations suggest that the plan continues today," >Thompson said in his statement. > >Thompson went on to talk about other aspects of the Senate >inquiry, which is expected to continue through the fall, and >subsequent proceedings last week shed little new light on the >China question. But his statement on China -- confirming in >public much of what already has appeared in the media -- was >what made the week's most prominent headlines and >provoked the strongest political response. > >The existence of the Chinese plan was reported first last >February by The Washington Post, based on information >provided by executive branch sources. In an article on Feb. >13 and in subsequent articles, The Post reported that the >Justice Department was investigating the effort, much of which >was uncovered in coded communications traffic between >Beijing and the Chinese Embassy here and elsewhere. > >The investigation has established that the plan was launched in >1995 as a relatively benign congressional lobbying activity, but >became an effort whose goal was to illegally funnel money into >political campaigns. Approved at the highest levels of the >Beijing government, the plan was placed under the control of >the Chinese Ministry of State Security, Beijing's equivalent of >the CIA. > >Thus far, however, federal investigators have been unable to >discover a direct link between money from Beijing and the >Democratic National Committee or the Clinton reelection >campaign. > >In his own opening presentation Tuesday immediately >following Thompson, Sen. John Glenn (Ohio), the committee's >ranking Democrat, noted that he had declined to sign on to >Thompson's statement and asked whether there was "any real >evidence" that such a plan had been carried out by China. >Glenn, who had access to the same information as Thompson, >said he believed Thompson had gone "a little further than I >would choose to go." > >But Thompson insisted in the interview Friday that he felt the >information was of sufficient gravity that a summary should be >made public. "We couldn't sit on it. If it came out in a year or >six months that China was doing all this with all the issues with >regard to China on the table, ranging from trade status to >defense issues, the committee would rightly be subject to >intense criticism." > >Thompson said he had examined some of the critical >intelligence data, and that three senior investigators on the >committee staff had spent "hundreds of hours" reviewing the >information. > >"I felt it was important to make it public right away," >Thompson said. "I cannot imagine Congress and the American >people not having the benefit of what we know. . . . Nothing >could be more relevant than this information." > >He acknowledged, however, that given the sensitivity of the >information, "We may never be able to lay out all of the >details." Documentation of the Chinese plan is contained in >highly classified intelligence intercepts that rarely are made >public because disclosure might compromise sensitive sources >and methods used to protect national security. > >Glenn indirectly referred in his statement to possible partisan >motives on Thompson's part, and the fact that the overall >committee investigation has focused in large part on suspect >foreign donations to the Democrats. "If there was Chinese >government money illegally entering the American political >system," Glenn asked, "is there any evidence that such money >went to candidates of only one political party?" > >In addition, Glenn said, "I am greatly concerned about how >the reports are sometimes discussed by individuals in this body >and in the press. I've heard language like `infiltration,' `foreign >spies,' `foreigners,' we're `jeopardizing our national security.' " >"Well, on this issue," Glenn said, "the committee should go just >as far as the facts take us, recognizing that it's the FBI that's in >a much better position than a congressional committee to do >an espionage investigation." > >Some Senate Democrats have played down, if not disputed, >Thompson's revelations. "For a large man, Senator Thompson >has crawled out on a very narrow limb, and it's a long way >back," Sen. Robert G. Torricelli (D-N.J.), a committee >member, said on Fox television last week. "I was very >surprised by his statement." > >But another Democratic senator familiar with the classified >evidence said Thompson was on solid ground. > >For his part, President Clinton has neither embraced nor >disputed Thompson's account. "I do not know whether it is >true or not," Clinton said last week. Accordingly, Clinton said >the charge "can't in any way, and shouldn't affect the larger >long-term strategic interests of the American people and our >foreign policy. . . . However, it is a serious charge. . . . And I >think we have to let the investigation play itself out." > >On Thursday, the Chinese government repeated its previous >denials that such a plan was ever formulated or carried out. >"Some people in the United States, out of domestic political >needs, are out of thin air once again slandering China," Foreign >Ministry spokesman Tang Guoqiang said in Beijing. > >Thompson's Tuesday statement provided additional details on >the scope of the plan and its goals. In addition to targeting >federal and state campaigns, he said, "another aspect of the >plan is remarkable because it shows that the [People's >Republic of China] is interested in developing long-term >relationships with persons it has identified as up-and-coming >officials at state and local levels. The intent is to establish >relations that can be cultivated as the officials rise through the >ranks to higher office. . . ." > >U.S. intelligence has established that about $2 million was >allocated by the Chinese government, of which at least $1 >million was transferred to U.S. banks or to the Chinese >Embassy here. > >But officials familiar with the details of the investigation are >quick to point out that critical gaps remain, and may never be >closed. Principal among them is the failure to establish a >conclusive link between the well-documented plan and any of >the suspect contributions that went to the Democratic National >Committee. > >The intelligence on the Chinese plan establishes that Beijing >had the "intent" to make illegal campaign contributions, one >official said. Separate public records show that millions of >dollars of suspect and possibly illegal contributions were made >to the DNC. But there is no direct line between Chinese >money and DNC-Clinton coffers. > >"There is an intent and a crime," the official said, "but the two >have not been connected." > >Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), a veteran of the Senate >intelligence committee and a member of Thompson's >committee, has called this missing link "the dotted lines" >between the plan and political contributions. > >Others on the Republican side have described the >establishment of those links as the central goal of the >committee's inquiry. "The premise that the Chinese >government has been involved in our political process >underpins everything we're trying to prove about the serious >problems with the last election," said Paul Clark, spokesman >for the committee Republicans. > >Because of the Justice Department's criminal investigation, the >FBI is declining to provide Congress -- including Thompson's >panel and the House and Senate intelligence committees -- >with more details about the Chinese connection. > >"The curtain has come down," one source said, noting that >some of the most sensitive intelligence sources were being >used in the criminal probe. > >Staff writer Guy Gugliotta and researcher Jeff Glasser >contributed to this report. > >) Copyright 1997 The Washington Post Company > > > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: kalliste@aci.net (J. Orlin Grabbe) > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail