Time: Sun Jul 13 20:31:46 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA09460;
	Sun, 13 Jul 1997 20:22:34 -0700 (MST)
	by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA15026;
	Sun, 13 Jul 1997 20:22:22 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 20:22:05 -0700
To: mehmarbj@pacbell.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: USELESS AMERICAN VOTER REALITY (fwd)

Yet another reason to stick with 28 U.S.C. 1746(1),
provided that you are inside the state zone,
and outside the federal zone.  The statute has
the pro forma language to use.  I extend it by
saying:

   "outside the United States (federal government)"

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com



At 06:50 PM 7/13/97 -0700, you wrote:
>PAM,
>
>The problem I have with Notaries is that they all ways want to
>see "ID" and I aint got no 'cause I yam what I yam . . .
>
>Bjorn
mail-la1.pacbell.net (8.8.5/8.7.1) with ESMTP id TAA26195 for
<mehmarbj@mail-la1.pacbell.net>; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
[206.165.5.101]) by mail-gw.pacbell.net (8.8.5/8.7.1+antispam) with ESMTP
id TAA29014 for <mehmarbj@pacbell.net>; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
[206.165.44.37])
>	by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA09617;
>	Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:46:13 -0700 (MST)
>Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:45:53 -0700
>To: mehmarbj@pacbell.net
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: USELESS AMERICAN VOTER REALITY
>References: <19970712.053012.3238.0.kilometers@juno.com>
> <33C85DAB.46F6@pacbell.net>
> <19970713.001819.3238.1.kilometers@juno.com>
> <3.0.3.16.19970713144110.381f53b4@pop.primenet.com>
>
>I would NOT use a Notary, unless I also qualified
>the declaration, as follows:
>
> "Purpose of Notary is for identification only,
>  and NOT for entry into any foreign jurisdiction."
>
>Now you are totally covered.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>http://www.supremelaw.com
>
>
>
>At 05:07 PM 7/13/97 -0700, you wrote:
>>PAM,
>>
>>David suggest using the Notary, however, I agree, an affidavit under
>>P of P seems to do the trick.  For real important stuff I use a Notary,
>>kinda like crossing your fingers . . .
>>
>>Bjorn
>>
>>//
>>
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>> 
>>> Don't forget to subpoena the contract let to the
>>> IRS by the State Tax Commission.  The IRS is inside
>>> the several states under authority of 50 different
>>> contracts, all of which appear to have started with
>>> form letters, with blanks for the state-specific
>>> information.  So, you can obtain that contract in
>>> one of two places:  the Commissioner of Internal
>>> Revene (one signatory), and/or the State Tax Commission
>>> (the other signatory). The copy we have from Oklahoma
>>> says "IRS" is an agency of the U.S. Department of
>>> the Treasury, which is belied by Title 31, U.S.C. in toto.
>>> 
>>> For authority, see Tenth Amendment.  If you want us to
>>> fax our copy to you, please be prepared to make a
>>> donation;  we have overhead too.
>>> 
>>> Have fun!  I always do in these cases.
>>> 
>>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>>> http://www.supremelaw.com
>>> 
>>> p.s.  Dispense with the Notary.  Use 28 U.S.C. 1746(1)
>>> instead;  it is supreme Law, pursuant to the Supremacy
>>> Clause, and there is obviously here a provision which
>>> extends this statute beyond the federal zone;  it is
>>> subparagraph (1) supra.  Compare, in pari materia,
>>> 18 U.S.C. 1512 and 1513.  Confer also at "Inclusio unius
>>> est exclusio alterius" in Black's Law Dictionary.
>>> 1746 smokes out the all-important distinction between
>>> the federal zone and the state zone.  You never notarized
>>> your tax returns before, did you?  Now you know why
>>> (see 28 U.S.C. 1746(2)).
>>> 
>>> At 10:09 AM 7/13/97 -0700, you wrote:
>>> >Miles,
>>> >
>>> >Did you subpoena the Commisioner of the IRS for the contract waiver? [the
>>> >David Dodge shuffle is at paragraph *2* - if not, you loose], id est:
>>> >
>>> >Affidavit in Support of Subpoena Duces Tecum
>>> >>
>>> >> State of California)
>>> >>              ss):
>>> >> County of San Diego)
>>> >>
>>> >>        I, Jeffry C. Lorenz, Affiant, after first being duly sworn
>according
>>> >>        to law, being competent to testify, affirms under penalties of
>>> >>        perjury, that the matters subject to this Subpoena Duces Tecum
>>> >>        consist of the following:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1. The agent for the fictitious Plaintiff Paul J. Pfingst is
>commanded to
>>> >> prove the substantive fact of jurisdiction on the record as no
>evidence of
>>> >> a waiver nor contract between  Affiant and the County of San Diego
>has been
>>> >> entered into the record of this court.
>>> >
>>> >                   ************************
>>> >
>>> >> 2. The agent for the ficticious Plaintiff Paul J. Pfingst under the
>>> >> accompanying Subpoena Duces Tecum is commanded to prove jurisdiction
>on the
>>> >> record by producing a CERTIFIED copy of any written instrument
>wherein the
>>> >> man Jeffry C. Lorenz has knowingly and intelligently executed a valid
>>> waiver
>>> >> of Jeffry C. Lorenz's unalienable right to life, liberty, and the
>>> pursuit of
>>> >> happiness; and, that said waiver includes the transfer of said
rights to
>>> the
>>> >> County of San Diego/State of California/United States, Plaintiff,
>>> Plaintiff's
>>> >> heirs or assigns, by power of attorney or other written instrument;
and,
>>> that
>>> >> said instrument(s) includes the specific authorization to punish, as
>though
>>> >> Jeffry C. Lorenz were but an errant slave, for acts or deeds which by
>>> >> themself, lacked malice or caused harm to anyone or anyone's property.
>>> >
>>> >                  ******************************
>>> >>
>>> >> Further Affaint sayeth naught
>>> >>
>>> >>                                         Verification
>>> >>
>>> >>         I, Jeffry C. Lorenz, am the Affiant in the above entitled
>>> Affidavit and
>>> >> I have read the foregoing Affidavit and know the contents thereof.  The
>>> same is
>>> >> true of My knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein
>>> alleged on
>>> >> information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be
>true.
>>> >>         I certify under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and
>>> correct and
>>> >> that this affidavit was executed on the Xth day of the Xth month, Anno
>>> Domini
>>> >> 1997 at a location known as San Diego, California.
>>> >>
>>> >> Dated: ___________________________________
>>> >>
>>> >> __________________________________________
>>> >> Jeffry C. Lorenz
>>> >> c/o 13019 Vista View Drive
>>> >> Poway, CA 92064
>>> >>
>>> >> Before me _______________________________ a notary public for the
>state of
>>> >> California and authorized to administer oaths, appeared Jeffry C.
Lorenz
>>> and
>>> >> after having identified himself to me and swearing to the truthfulness
>>> of the
>>> >> foregoing facts, placed his bona fide signature upon this document
under
>>> penalties
>>> >> of perjury on this Xth day of XXXXX, 1997.
>>> >>
>>> >> _________________________________    Notary Signature
>>> >>
>>> >> My commission expires: _____________________________
>>> >
>>> >Obviously modify the above to suit the suit . . .
>>> >
>>> >When your beloved commissioner fails to respond then go after him/her for
>>> contempt
>>> >and sanctions . . .
>>> >
>>> >Bjorn
>>> >
>>> >//
>>> >
>>> >kilometers@juno.com wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I am in agreement with you on the futility of the voter situation and
>>> >> understand that you are pretty much on point on the numbers concerning
>>> >> "voter turnout".
>>> >>
>>> >> I know in reality that getting a Petition or Bill into Congress is at
>>> >> most a vision or hallucination.  It's nice to dream though.
>>> >>
>>> >> I was hoping to stimulate some growth in the "idea" brainstorming arena
>>> >> in order to come up with a way to shove the federal citizen crap down
>the
>>> >> federal governments throat.  I don't mind living by a set of
>>> >> laws...........but to be put in a situation where the rich keep the
poor
>>> >> dumb.........if we the not so rich but somewhat cognitive of the
present
>>> >> and past and possibly future circumstances here in our
country.......can
>>> >> rise to the occasion........maybe all is not lost.
>>> >>
>>> >> You're about the only doggone winner I have ever seen.
>>> >> But, this information isn't reaching the public at large.  No mass
media
>>> >> or mailings.  The people stay stupid.
>>> >>
>>> >> Since finding out how to beat speeding tickets I have personnally
>>> >> followed at least a dozen people who I have seen pulled over for
>speeding
>>> >> ( as they would tell me later when I stopped them ) I have helped them
>>> >> find a way to fight the cops.  I have recieved a couple of phone calls
>>> >> and a couple of letters of thanks.  They actually won.  But, not
>everyone
>>> >> is instructed in law to carry a DMV two inch thick Code around with
>them.
>>> >>  I was told to carry one by the CHP officer who gave the course I went
>>> >> to.  He instructed us in class to pull out the Code and challenge every
>>> >> sight written for you.   Each of the people I told this to, now
>carries a
>>> >> DMV Code book around in their vehicles.
>>> >>
>>> >> Still need some brainstorming help.
>>> >>
>>> >> Still need to get the Federal Employer / Federal Employee information
>>> >> arouind to the people at large for them to think about what benefits
the
>>> >> DB's are getting downtown and why they (the people at large) aren't
>>> >> getting them - equally.
>>> >>
>>> >> All these taxfighters seem to give law in fifty directions that
requires
>>> >> someone versed in legal research to dig up.  What makes you taxable
>is in
>>> >> five directions and written  in five books in about ten paragraphs that
>>> >> can be found in one trip to the law library and read in a few hours.
>>> >> Pretty easy.  I mean........these are the laws the courts get thrown at
>>> >> them all the time............so they clearly understand
>>> >> them............why not use them to ones benefit.
>>> >>
>>> >> My idea is much simpler for the simple minded "GIVE ME SOMETHING"
>Federal
>>> >> citizen than the Library of Congress you must take into court to prove
>>> >> you own no taxes.  Why not pay the tax..........and get your thirty
days
>>> >> paid vacation..........fifteen days paid sick time........all paid
>>> >> federal holidays.........a good federal retirement you can live
>>> >> on.........and so on????????
>>> >>
>>> >> I mean.........this is something that when you walk in to the court
with
>>> >> the actual law books and show the judge.........page by
>>> >> page..........paragraph by paragraph..........line by
line..........word
>>> >> for word.............that you should be getting the very same benefits
>>> >> and entitlements as the Public Servants who pursue the citizenry for
>>> >> their monies....... there is no disputing the law as it is written.
>>> >>
>>> >> The IRS court  questions are always the
>>> >> same...............................................
>>> >> Is this your name on the complaint
>>> >> form..................................YES
>>> >> Do you have a form of I.D. such as a DMV License................YES
>>> >> Do you have a social security
>>> >> number.......................................YES
>>> >> Do you or have you ever registered to
>>> >> vote................................YES
>>> >> Are you a U.S.
>>> >>
>>>
>citizen.....................................................................
>>> .YES
>>> >> Are you a citizen of the State of
>>> >> California..................................YES
>>> >> Do you work for a company or
>>> >> business...................................YES
>>> >> Are you a licensed
>>> >> business.......................................................YES
or NO
>>> >> Have you ever signed a W-4
>>> >> Form..............................................YES
>>> >> Have you ever signed a 1040
>>> >> Form............................................YES
>>> >> DO YOU EXPECT to draw social
>security.................................YES
>>> >>
>>> >> IRS ANSWER::::::::::::::::::::
>>> >> Your honor.............this person with all the above hasn't filed his
>>> >> tax forms and the government has assessed him for $35,000 dollars for
>the
>>> >> past five years.  We ask the court for a judgement to compell this
>>> >> taxpayer to pay his taxes.
>>> >>
>>> >> THE JUDGE:::::::::::::::::::::::
>>> >> Pay up...............idiot.
>>> >>
>>> >> ME:::::::::
>>> >> The people get slammed because they truly and honestly know nothing of
>>> >> what's happening to them and if they do they understand NOThing as of
>>> >> "WHY".  If we who kow...........don't stand up and tell
>>> >> them............then we are just as guilty as the government for
putting
>>> >> the people in a no win situation.  If one sees a child being molested
>and
>>> >> do nothing..........one may as well have done the crime ones self.
If I
>>> >> see my people being raped..............then I should either join in the
>>> >> raping..........or I should stop it if I know it is
>wrong.............and
>>> >> we know it's wrong.  I would give my life for another's child as
well as
>>> >> my own.  In fact,,,,,,,,,I have saved a child's life in that order.  I
>>> >> got hit by a city bus while throwing a three year old to the side on
>>> >> Paradise Valley Road.  No news, no fame, no glory.  Just did what was
>the
>>> >> right thing to do.  Every year or two I still get  XMAS cards for it.
>>> >> That happened in 1981.  I'm not forgotten and the child is growing
to be
>>> >> a good person.  If I had to do it again........I'd not think twice.
I'd
>>> >> do the right thing.  For Free.
>>> >>
>>> >> MIles
>>> >
>>> >
>>> 
>>>
>========================================================================>
>Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>>> B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>>> 
>>> tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>>> email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
>>> website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
>>>              Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
>>>              Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
>>> 
>>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
>>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>>>
>========================================================================>
>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>>
>
>========================================================================
>Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>
>tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
>website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
>             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
>             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
>
>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>========================================================================
>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail