Time: Thu Jul 17 13:40:57 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA06729 for [address in tool bar]; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 13:36:58 -0700 (MST) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA20198; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 13:24:07 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 13:23:38 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Larry Harris Followers Beware (fwd) <snip> > >--Please Pass On To Others In Your Networks-- > >Title: Larry Harris, Biological Attack, and Psychological > Warfare on America > >By Dr. Len Horowitz >President, Tetrahedron Incorporated > > >Numerous questions have arisen regarding >Larry Harris's credibility and his predictions and >prescriptions for biological warfare aimed against >the United States and our people. I am extremely >suspicious of Larry Harris for at least six reasons: > >1) Mr. Harris is virtually practicing medicine without a >license on a public health scale as he has recommended that >people go out and buy antibiotics to be taken at the first sign of trouble. >I am not opposed to stockpiling and refrigerating antibiotics as >a preventive measure, but before treatment is initiated, diagnosis >is critical. Many antibiotic resistant strains of bioweapons have >been produced making one's choice of antibiotic moot in the >absence of laboratory analysis. > >Moreover, on occasion, Mr. Harris has prescribed >antibiotic dosages that may leave many people >suffering from nerve damage or other illnesses. >The correct human dose of tetracycline is 250 to at most >500 milligrams per day for ten to fourteen days. One gentleman >personally informed me he was instructed by Mr. Harris to take >three times that dose for a month--clearly a toxic prescription. > > >2) Mr. Harris has been called by some "a fraud" and others >an "expert scientist." Wherein lies the truth? > >Months ago I was sent Mr. Harris's resume' along with >portions of his book. I was unimpressed. The many >spelling and grammatical errors found clearly reflected an >educational and professional deficit. I'm reminded of the >phrase "real men don't eat quiche." Real scientists know >their publications, particularly their curriculum vitaes, >are a measure of their professional integrity. >Legitimate scientists would be aghast to have such a >mistake-laden reflection of their work circulating. > >Likewise, the poor content in Mr. Harris's audio >and video presentations, as discussed below, reflects >a possibly sincere laboratory technician, and superficially >credited microbiologist, but not a highly or even well-credentialed >man of science, health, or bioweapons research. > >3) Mr. Harris alleges to have been a CIA agent with CDC >bioweapons laboratory experience. CIA agents have been >known to be notoriously unreliable and sources of >counterintelligence propaganda. If Mr. Harris's connections >to the CIA are true, and I don't doubt Mr. Harris's sincerity >in believing his reports and CIA connections are, then given >the nature of his information, and the social/political context >in which it is being disseminated, I must conclude Mr. Harris >is being used by elements within the CIA as a counterintelligence propagandist. > >Case in point, weeks ago when Associated Press announced >Mr. Harris's guilty plea to fraud charges, it was predictable >this would further endear Mr. Harris in the hearts and minds >of many people on the political right and well as >anti-government groups. It was likewise predictable >Mr. Harris would then be additionally useful in discrediting >certain "fringe" elements who favored him or his arbitrary >health and safety prescriptions. As the attachments show, >this has all come to pass. > >Regardless of Mr. Harris's personal intent, he is now >functioning as a tool for propagandists, and the public should >be forewarned. > >4) Mr. Harris recently pleaded guilty of fraud in a plea bargain >regarding the illegal storage and transportation of pathogenic >microorganisms. Had Mr. Harris been a legitimate scientist, >he might have arranged to have his experimental material >shipped more safely and legally. > >5) The story of Mr. Harris's friend "Miriam," a Muslim woman >who, along with alleged allied terrorists, are preparing to release >bioweapons on American populations, entirely self-incriminates >Mr. Harris. > >First, this story is consistent with another CIA affiliate >and government propagandist, best selling author Tom Clancy >who, in his recent book, presented the same thesis as Harris. > >Next, Mr. Harris's expressed personal knowledge of "Miriam" >includes granting her a three-day head start to "get away" >from federal authorities. If this were true, then Mr. Harris >would be guilty of treason, and aiding and abetting in a >conspiracy that, according to Harris, may kill well over >150 million Americans. Is it reasonable to give trust to >a man who gives such a terrorist three days to escape >thus jeopardizing the continent of North America and >beyond? > >Furthermore, as advanced by pharmacist, attorney and >biowarfare researcher Lawrence Joyce in >"Lessons From Dugway" [(773) 286-7986], it would be >counter intelligent for Muslim terrorists to perform as >Mr. Harris alleged. In Joyce's well considered words, >"you can get more bang for the buck by getting the world's >largest economic and military power to concede to your >demands than you can by destroying it. After all, you >can't control and manipulate dead people, and you gain >no power by gaining control over a wrecked economy; >you gain power by dictating the course of the lives of >people who are part of a strong economy. The tail will >always jump at the chance to wag the dog." > >Joyce details additional reasons why a Harris scenario >is counterproductive and unlikely for terrorist organizations. >Moreover, common sense would tell you that even Muslim >hate/extremist groups would not be inclined to attack urban >areas of the U.S. wherein the vast majority of their >support emanates. > >My research indicates Americans, and others worldwide, >are at far greater risk of bioweapons attack by a rogue >element within our own CIA than from anyone else. >This must be understood in light of America's principle >national security interest (and clearly articulated motive)-- >population control, the purveyors of which now >focus on reducing the U.S. population by >approximately 125 million, and they have the means >to do it. > >The world's leading biotechnology laboratories and >chemical and biological weapons (CBW) contracting >firms are ours, including institutions such as Merck, Sharp & >Dohme, Litton Industries, Dow Chemical, and others. >As documented in "Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, >Accident or Intentional?"[Toll free (888)-508-4787], >the insidious nature and international extent of the >military-medical-industrial bioweapons complex is >shocking to say the least. > >It should be recalled that the Bush administration supplied >Sadam Hussein with military and biological armaments up >until two weeks before our vets, now many ailing from Gulf >War Syndrome (GWS), invaded Kuwait. U.S. Government >celebrated and promulgated vaccines, some produced by >Tannox Biomedical Systems, co-owned by Bush's Secretary >of State James Baker III, continue to plague our vets >and jeopardize the public's health while federal authorities >turn a blind eye to the true hazards of deadly vaccine >contaminations being given even today to America's children. > >Thus, Mr. Harris's and other propagandists' blaming >political enemies, and the victims of biological attacks >(as was recently the case when parents were blamed for >not getting their children vaccinated in lieu of a >hepatitis A outbreak associated with U.S. Government produced >and distributed contaminated desserts, or decades ago >gay men and Black Africans were blamed for initiating >the AIDS epidemic, when contaminated vaccines were >more plausibly the cause) is convenient chicanery, insulting >to all who see through the ruse. Unfortunately, too >few do. > >And with more and more conflicting messages >being passed by people like Mr. Harris, or his handlers, >it becomes harder and harder to see the forest of >legitimate threat through the trees of disinformation >and counterintelligence propaganda. > >6) Mr. Harris has also endorsed certain antibiotics, including >colloidal silver, and certain manufacturers and distributors >of these products. I believe that this is a questionable and >perhaps unethical practice. Though I too favor proven safe and >effective doses of alternative therapies for specific illnesses, >I have yet to read one convincing scientific report to substantiate >Mr. Harris's claims regarding colloidal silver as a universal >antibiotic and antiviral. Clearly more research needs to be done >in this area. > >In one advertisement on short wave, Mr. Harris was said to >have found colloidal silver effective against 600 different >types of microorganisms. By 1970, the World Health Organization >and domestic biological weapons establishment had "isolated" >more than 70,000 different strains of viruses alone. >Moreover, Mr. Harris's promoters have recommended daily use >of this antibiotic without citing its undesirable effects on the >normal intestinal flora. All of this at the time the FDA-- >America's medical mafia--is threatening to regulate colloidal >silver and other potentially useful, low risk and cost alternatives >to expensive and toxic, but patentable pharmaceuticals. >Here again, Mr. Harris is playing right into the hands of our >shadow governors, pharmaceutical industry barons, > and their propagandists. > >In concluding my remarks re: Larry Harris, I would urge caution >in matters concerning public health and biological warfare >as articulated by him. He may well be, as he claims to have >been, an agent for the CIA, though much of his information >appears to be counter intelligent in nature. > >I have no doubt that we will have increasing numbers of >small to medium size outbreaks of infectious microorganisms >like E. coli 157, flesh eating bacteria, meningococci, >new viruses like AIDS, Ebola, Hanta, hepatitis C, and others that CIA >bioweapons contractors investigated (if not developed), and further >dispersed, during and after "Project: MKNAOMI," that are now associated >with widespread illness. These outbreaks will parallel >rising mortality rates from virus-linked soft tissue cancers, >including prostate, breast, and lymphomas, and from increasingly >common exposures to various chemical and environmental >pollutants and manmade toxins. Some, if not most of these >exposures will be intentionally and covertly administered >such as the recent CBS News televised spraying of the human carcinogen >malathion (and possibly additional toxins) from black helicopters >over South Florida and Miami beach (allegedly to counter a >fruit fly infestation). Such activities and exposures may well >serve a clearly articulated and well documented population control >agenda now targeting the United States population as others have >been targeted in years past. > >Moreover, the mainstream news media will continue to ignore, >and in many cases, obscure the facts. > >This information is relayed in the interest of public health and >safety by: > >Tetrahedron Incorporated-- >a nonprofit educational corporation >serving the public's health since 1978. >No tax deductable contributions or government >grants are accepted by the company. > >For more information, link to http://www.tetrahedron.org >or E-mail: tetra@tetrahedron.org > >Attachments: 2 > >Attachment 1 > >------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- >Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 06:16:51 >To: deva777@dedot.com >From: Angie Carlson <angie@pop3.connectnet.com> > >>>Subject: US NEWS & WORLD REPORT ON LARRY HARRIS >>> >The new terror fear: biological weapons >>>Detecting an attack is just the first problem >>><GRAPHICS/x31918.cap> >>> >>>BY NICHOLAS HORROCK >>> >>>America is stepping up preparations to cope with biological warfare. This >month, at undisclosed locations in Denver, medical and weapons experts will >begin to assess the city's ability to contend with terrorists using >biological, radiological, or chemical weapons of mass destruction. Denver >is the first of 120 cities where federal authorities will evaluate >emergency capabilities under a $42.6 million Domestic Preparedness Program >that is the largest civil defense initiative since the Cold War. This >program begins two weeks after the Pentagon granted the first contract in a >possible $400 million program to develop a detection system to sniff out >deadly airborne microbes spread by an enemy. >>> >>>Three events have created the new urgency: Iraq deployed missiles bearing >anthrax germs, botulinum (a toxin that spreads the deadly disease >botulism), and aflatoxin (a poison derived from mold) during the 1991 >Persian Gulf war, and its biological weapons program continues, according >to intelligence experts; a 1995 Tokyo attack in which the cultlike >terrorist group Aum spread nerve gas in the subway system killing 12 >people; and a little publicized conviction in Ohio last month of a >microbiologist named Larry Wayne Harris, who pleaded guilty to fraudulently >obtaining bubonic plague cultures. Harris, who has ties to right-wing >groups, was sentenced to 18 months probation and community service. The >plague cultures were obtained by Harris with such ease that in 1996 >Congress tightened laws on commerce in deadly biological materials to make >sure they were ordered for legitimate medical and scientific purposes. >>> >>>Poor man's nukes. The CIA now says Iraq has been joined by North Korea, >Iran, Libya, Syria, and even China in the quest to make biological weapons. >Their motive is simple: Biologicals are cheaper and easier to make than >nuclear or chemical weapons, and they can be equally as devastating. The >U.S. Office of Technology Assessment once estimated that a small private >plane, with 220 pounds of anthrax spores, flying over Washington on a >clear, windless night, could trail an invisible, odorless mist that would >kill between 1 million and 3 million people. >>> >>>However, retired Army Col. Karl Lowe, an arms-control expert, argued in a >recent essay that it would be very hard for terrorists to carry off a >biological attack. Many biologicals can be dissipated by wind or rain, or >must be ingested in such enormous amounts as to make their use as a weapon >of mass destruction impossible. >>> >>>Though difficult to execute, a biological attack would be virtually >impossible to detect in its early stages. "Ideally we would like to develop >a detection system using something remote, like a laser beam that could >detect and identify a biological agent at standoff distances," says >Assistant Defense Secretary Harold Smith. But that prospect is years away, >so the Pentagon is trying to develop a "point detector" that could be >mounted on a remote-controlled vehicle. It should be able to sniff air >samples and determine within 15 minutes whether any of 26 dangerous agents >are present, according to Brig. Gen. John Doesburg, whose command awarded >the first contract for such a vehicle last month. >>> >>>The best detector now is a Humvee mounted with what appears to be a small >Hansel and Gretel house with three chimneys, named in the Army's cumbersome >fashion the Biological Integrated Detection System, or BIDS. The problem >with BIDS is that it takes two persons to operate, requires 30 to 45 >minutes to identify biological agents (an eternity in combat), and can >simultaneously identify only four. Next year, DOD will field a temporary >improvement, the Air Base/Port Biological Detection system, at bases in two >areas of high tension, like South Korea and Saudi Arabia. >>> >>>On the civilian side, a law passed last year requires DOD to go beyond >troop protection and assist in civil defense. An incident in Washington, >D.C., last month added urgency to the effort. The headquarters of the B'nai >B'rith, the national Jewish service organization, received a package with a >threatening note and the laboratory words for anthrax on it. It turned out >to be harmless, but had anthrax been loose in Washington's downtown, U.S. >readiness would have faced the supreme test. >>>../../graphics/map/usmenub.map> >>> >>> >>>Have a comment? Want to read what others have to say? ><../../edu/misc/eduforum.htm>Click here >../credits.htm>CREDITS >>> >>>Send comments to <mailto:webmaster@usnews.com>webmaster@usnews.com >>> >>>c Copyright U.S. News & World Report, Inc. All rights reserved. >>> >>>This site is engineered by <http://www.agtnet.com/>AGTinteractive >>> >>> > >Attachment 2: > >From: TWStough@aol.com >Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 11:20:33 -0400 (EDT) >To: TWStough@aol.com >Subject: Update On Larry Wayne Harris - Direct From The "Horse's Mouth" > > > >I logged off the internet at 2:30 am and logged back on at 6:30. I had about >20 messages, most of whom had to do with Mr.Harris. I read them all quickly >and then had to take my wife to the airport. > >On the way back, I called Mr. Harris and confronted him with the allegations >raised by the Medical Corps and the Montana Militia. > >Here is what he told me: > >1. The Medical Corps consists of a single former medical corpman with >absolutely no credentials other than his military training. He makes his >living selling used Army manuals to the militias. > >2. The Montana Militia issued their statement based solely on the basis of >information they received from the "Medical Corps". They knew him >apparently from manual deals in the past. BTW, did you notice the thinly >veiled threats in the MM information? > >3. Mr. Harris is forwarding me the phone numbers of a group of scientists, >doctors, etc. which can back up his dosage recommendations. I will check >these out and get back to you with further information. > >4. The dosage recommendations of the "Medical Corps" will be insufficient to >fight off the disease and people could die from undermedication as opposed to >statements of the "Medical Corps" that people would die from overmedication >if they followed Mr. Harris' recommendations. > >I think at this point, it is well established that Mr. Harris is an expert in >this area (Remember that the original disinformation was that he was a >septic tank inspector and that he had no lab). > >I think if the above information is correct, there can be no reliance placed >on the statements of the Medical Group and Montana Militia statements based >on information received from the Medical group. > >I think it is also clear that something is wrong with the statements about >the charges against him which have appeared in various e-mails. If he >really had gotten these biological agents and had no legitimate use for them, >do you think he would be walking around now? (Yes, I used the wrong term >(Blue Law) but I think it was clear what I was talking about.) > >It is clear from former Senator Nunn's statements that it was not a matter of >"if" an attack would occur, it was only a matter of when. Therefore, this is >not a matter of whether or not the threat is real. IT IS. The only question >is WHEN the attack will occur. My point has been from the beginning that we >should get ready NOW. Then if the attack is later, we will still be >prepared. > >I am not sure I mentioned this earlier, but among items faxed by Mr. Harris >is a copy of a fax to the Governor of Arizona regarding Marshall Law >exercises about to be conducted in Phoenix. It also indicates that these >exercises are about to be declared in several other states. There also was a >press release indicating that on May 28th a convoy of 100 trucks, etc. were >deployed to Phoenix. > >He also sent a copy of a document entitled "The Economic Impact Of A >Bioterrorist Attack: Are Prevention and Postattack Intervention Programs >Justifiable. This report was issued in the Spring Quarter 1997 issue of >Emerging Infectious Diseases and were written by three people from the CDC. > >I also received an e-mail stating that this possible attack could not be real >because we would have no warning if it was real. I totally disagree. The >information was not released by the parties involved but was discovered >through various incidents. There is no absolutely no guarantee that this >will happen. However, the probability IMHO is high. I would rather have >egg on my face than anthrax up my nose. Note that there has been massive and >instantaneous disinformation. If this was purposefully planted or sent, you >can only conclude that someone is trying to confuse us and get us to stop >paying attention to this issue. > >I also want to make it perfectly clear that I do not think that the Iranians >/ Iraqis / Etc. are in this alone. They were either intentionally provoked >by the Conspiracy or they have recruited these people to do their dirty work. > One thing is clear. There HAS to be a reason why those people hate us so >much. That reason has NEVER been fully covered in the media. > > >I hope this helps you sort out fact from fiction. > > >Terry > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail