Time: Sat Jul 19 06:10:43 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA27888
	for [address in tool bar]; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:06:01 -0700 (MST)
	by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA18809;
	Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:05:33 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:05:07 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: An All-American Tax System (fwd)
Cc: deanstan@cybertron.com

Dear Clients,

We are back to the same question again:
the national sales tax fails to recognize
that the income tax revenues are not paying
for ANY government services, and neither
would a national sales tax.  All that money is
being laundered through an illegal trust
in Puerto Rico, and then forwarded to places
like the International Monetary Fund in
Brussels.  The solution, then, is to abolish
the income tax and to replace it with nothing.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

>July 14, 1997
>These are truly the dog days of the Republican Party.
>Successive national tickets have been defeated by Bill Clinton as
>convincingly as the GOP Congress has been cowed. If the incoming mail
>of one writer on public affairs is a reliable barometer of public
>sentiment, the party is in trouble -- for that mail is full of anger,
>despair and derision for the Republican leadership.
>To endure, a great party must be more than a line on a ballot or a
>vehicle for advancement. It must embody people's hopes. It must be,
>and be seen as, the vessel of a cause larger than itself. With the Cold
>War over, what is the great cause of the Grand Old Party?
>If that cause is to stand for lower taxes, and smaller, less
>intrusive government, it is time to revisit an idea broached here
>years ago: replacement of the U.S. income tax with a national sales
>tax. What would a national sales tax (NST) -- already adopted by Rep.
>Bill Archer, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee --
>accomplish? It would:
>-- End, in one stroke, all federal taxation of salaries, wages,
>dividends, interest, gifts, estates and capital gains.
>-- Eliminate all federal income tax forms, saving 5.4 billion work
>hours spent each year filling them out.
>-- Shift the U.S. tax burden off work, savings and investment onto
>consumption -- as economists have urged for years.
>-- Eliminate the Internal Revenue Service.
>-- Tax the "cash economy" and "underground economy" for the first
>time. All present tax evaders -- from tourists to tax cheats, from
>illegal aliens to organized crime -- would become U.S. taxpayers,
>chipping in, like the rest of us, every time they spent a dollar.
>-- Eliminate the need for hundreds of thousands of accountants,
>bookkeepers, tax lawyers and trust lawyers, turning them loose for
>more productive work than exploring the U.S. tax code for loopholes.
>-- Eliminate thousands of lobbyists now prowling the nation's capital
>for special tax breaks for their industries or corporations.
>A shift to an national sales tax would also have a dramatically
>favorable impact on the U.S. trade deficit. An NST of 15 percent
>would end the scandalous tax evasion by foreign corporations, putting
>U.S. goods on a level playing field with imports. Moreover,
>eliminating income and corporate taxes from the sticker price of U.S.
>products would strengthen America's competitive position in world
>With all federal taxes on income and investment lifted, wealth would
>pour into the United States. Foreign corporations would move here.
>Wealthy foreigners would stampede to make America their official
>residence for tax purposes. U.S. citizens who have moved their money
>abroad to evade income or estate taxes would come scurrying home.
>America would become the world's greatest enterprise zone!
>In the great GOP debate, between advocates of a flat tax and
>advocates of NST, the latter seem to this writer to have much the
>stronger case, for the flat tax has several fatal flaws.
>First, a flat tax of 17 percent on all incomes above $35,000 would
>give the scores of millions of Americans earning less than $35,000 no
>incentive to cut federal spending and every incentive to increase it.
>Second, since all capital gains and dividends go untaxed under a flat
>tax, the idle rich and the David Rockefellers, Warren Buffetts and
>their heirs would never pay a dime, though their employees would pay
>17 percent a year. This exemption for coupon-clippers and trust-fund
>babies will never pass muster with Congress or the country.
>The strongest argument against an NST has been that, under it, the
>poor, working poor and elderly living only on Social Security, who
>pay no income tax, would get a sharp tax hike -- since all their income
>is spent. But the wealthiest Americans, who are taxed today at near 40
>percent of income, would get a hefty tax cut.
>GOP Reps. Billy Tauzin and Dan Schaefer propose a way around this
>formidable obstacle. Under their NST, food, clothing and shelter are
>exempt, and the poor and working poor are made whole with rebates.
>As Rep. Tauzin argues, the U.S. income tax does not need to be
>reformed -- it needs to be pulled up by its roots. No system will
>satisfy all, and none is perfect, but the NST seems to be the best of
>all possible worlds.
>It eliminates the IRS. It ensures that everyone pays -- but only when
>we consume, not when we earn, save or invest. Tax evaders would now
>pony up, like everyone else. Imports would carry the same taxes as
>U.S.-made goods. Exports would go untaxed.
>Everyone would contribute to the national defense and all the other
>necessary duties of government, which is as it should be. In a
>democratic republic, there should be no freeloaders.
>The NST -- call it "America's tax code"!
>copyright Patrick J. Buchanan 1997
>            (=F4=BF=F4)    Dean Howard Stanton    (=F4=BF=F4)
>subscribe:		mailto:deanstan@cybertron.com
>home page: 		http://www.cybertron.com/~standean/
>voice email: 		http://www.vocaltec.com
>www pager:		http://wwp.mirabilis.com/127748
>To subscribe to c-news, send the message SUBSCRIBE C-NEWS, or the message
>UNSUBSCRIBE C-NEWS to unsubscribe, to majordomo@world.std.com. Contact
>owner-c-news@world.std.com if you have questions.
>Charles L Hamilton  (chasm@insync.net)  Houston, TX
>-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>->  Posted by: chasm@insync.net (Schuetzen)

Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail