Time: Sat Jul 19 19:04:31 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA05336
for [address in tool bar]; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 19:02:52 -0700 (MST)
by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA17429;
Sat, 19 Jul 1997 19:01:06 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 19:00:38 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Crush Those Seditionists!! But, Who are They? (fwd)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<snip>
>
>Friends,
>
>Jack McLamb's Aid and Abett Newsletter is always a good read. This
>particular excerpt is interesting because it juxtaposes our Founding
>Fathers quotes and correpsonding actions against the FBI's & ATF's
>definition of sedition and terrorism.
>
>Thanks Cynthia for taking the time to post this.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Brian Cavallo
>Glendale, Arizona
>(sixteen digit grid coordinates available on request)
>
>Isn't it intersting that the FBI is still confused over what brought
>down FLT TWA-800 (despite creditable folks who witnessed a missile
>signature)? Yet we're still left with legislation that treats all air
>passengers like terrorists.
>
>We are not here to overthrow the government. Our purpose is to ensure
>that a government is established within the parameters set by the US
>Cosntitution.
>
<snip>
>
> @@@@
> @ O O @
> @ ( > ) @ STOP ALL FEDERAL ABUSES NOW!!!
> \ 0 / SAFAN Internet Newsletter, No. 558, July 18, 1997
> / \
> *
>
>CRUSH THOSE SEDITIONISTS!" BUT, WHO ARE THEY?
>Posted by: Cynthis Eleazer (independence@southtech.net)
>
> AID & ABET POLICE NEWSLETTER
> Constitutional Issues for Lawmen
> Volume 3, Number 4
>
> "By deliberate, evil design of the global manipulators, the very best
> patriots in the private sector are to be violently pitted against the
> very best patriots in uniform, in hopes that they will kill each other
> off and that this "brother killing brother" violence will scare the
> American people into begging for martial law. This is the hope and
> the plan of those who benefit from, and even instigate, horrors like
> bombings, crime and anarchy. Such is intended to cause great
> FEAR and an outcry from the majority, for the suspension of the
> Constitution."
>
>"CRUSH THOSE SEDITIONISTS!" BUT, WHO ARE THEY?
>
>KNOW YOUR TARGET! We police officers and soldiers are being given increased
>in-service training, and tactical "terrorist"/"seditionist" warfare training,
>from our government "leaders," and their leftist propaganda instructors in
>the private sector, to psychologically prepare us to crush
>all those troublesome anti-World Government and pro-Constitution
>"seditionists." We therefore must define our "targets" well, and this
>article should help.
>
>Upon evaluation we find that those crazy American "seditionists/terrorists"
>believe that our nation is coming under a socialist totalitarian system.
>There are a number of ways that free nations have been able to tell when
>they are coming under totalitarian despotism. Thomas Payne pointed to
>one of these ways in his statement, "When the government fears the
>people there is Freedom, when the people fear the government there is
>tyranny." And James Madison, another, when he said, "A government
>that does not trust its law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is itself
>unworthy of trust." But perhaps one of the best sure-fire ways to size up
>the current political "lay of the land" would be to note very carefully just
>who it is that the government/media conglomerate is listing as the
>"seditionists" of the present day. If they are fingering good, moral,
>honorable and patriotic citizens, then the people should know that they
>are coming under tyranny. This was one of the bet tests in our nation's
>early history and it is one of the best tests now to discern what condition
>our Republic is in.
>
> Sedition: "…tumultuous (noisy, riotous) assembly in opposition
> to lawful authority; the stirring up of such opposition."
> --1943
>Webster's Dictionary
>
>You are right if you noticed that these definitions could fit most any
>persons or groups that have stood up, spoken out, or taken action
>against any policy or activity of governmental authority, with which there
>was disagreement. Interestingly however, the term "seditionist" is never
>used by our government on true radical leftist, communist-style
>individuals or groups that are secret political bedfellows, sponsored by
>those who control our government from behind the scenes. Believe it
>not? Just remember the statement of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Felix
>Frankfurter to the effect that, "The real rulers in Washington are invisible
>and exercise power from behind the scenes." F.D. Roosevelt, Winston
>Churchill, Barry Goldwater, and others have said basically the same
>thing.
>
> (See our police/military manual, OPERATION VAMPIRE KILLER 2000.)
>
>Notice, if you will, that the American Marxist war-resister seditionists -
>those demonstrating against our soldiers in Vietnam, or the American
>Marxists opposing any U.S. assistance to nationalistic, anti-communist
>causes around the world, such as that of the anti-Communist Cubans or
>the Contra freedom fighters of Central America - were never labeled
>such. Notice, too, how today's U.S., tax-funded, anti-American and
>pro-Marxist U.S. seditionist movements such as El Plan De Aztlan, La-Raza,
>our government school MEChA groups or others of the 300-plus similarly
>active Communist or Communist front/sympathizer groups, receive
>NO HEAT at all from our government. On the contrary, they receive
>government moral support and our tax dollars, as they work the
>globalist plan to bring our Republic to its knees.
>
>In a nutshell, what is certain and a matter of record, looking back over
>the past 50 years, is that ANY GROUP which has stood against our
>CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC or for the destruction of our FREE
>ENTERPRISE system, or for the removal of our property rights and the
>enslavement of our people, is never called "seditionist" by our
>government. This term is reserved solely for pro-God, pro-sovereignty,
>and pro-America individuals or groups. Simple, isn't it? To find "our
>target," we just look for those who love the God of the Bible, who love
>America and who stand in defense of America first - these are the targets
>that we sworn officers will soon be ordered to destroy.
>
>For those police and military colleagues who doubt what is said here,
>think about the things that are happening in our professional lives today:
>Can we not see that every day now our military organizations, federal,
>state and local police agencies, the media propagandist (affectionately
>called "prostitutes" by one of their own peers, New York Times Chief of
>Staff, John Swinton in 1953), and our socialist government's in-service
>training specialists (socialist private sector provocateurs and propagan-
>dists) are defining FOR us our targets? Yes, the target has been
>identified for us ENFORCERS as being any minority group of independent
>Americans (of any and all races and religions) possessing these "wild"
>thoughts and ideas about freedom, property ownership, God & Country,
>America First, etc. These, we police and soldiers are taught to look upon
>as "despicable anti-government seditionists." Various other identifying
>terminology is taught to us as well, in the course of the ongoing in-service
>"training" provided for us by government-sponsored, private-sector,
>leftist, hate-promoting, propagandists. Some of the descriptive terms
>used, and given a negative connotation, are: "right wing,"
>"anti-government," "extremists," "anti-Semitic," "racist," "white
>separatists," "white supremists," "freemen," "constitutionalists," "radical,"
>"violence-prone," "militia-types," "anarchists," "homophobic,"
>"Fundamentalist Christians," "tax protestors," etc. And notice how all these
>buzz words
>are picked up by the government-controlled media and schools, and
>used to turn all uniformed citizens against these "seditious" individuals
>and groups that are supposedly trying to disrupt our "utopian,"
>"progressive" (i.e., socialist) new world order.
>
>SEDITIONISTS" OF THE PAST
>
>To better recognize and understand our targets of today, let's take a
>look at some statements from a few "seditionists" of our nation's past:
>
>"If there be a principle that ought not to be questioned within the United
>States, it is that every man has a right to abolish an old government and
>establish a new one. This principle is not only recorded in every public
>archive, written in every American heart, and sealed with the blood of a
>host of American martyrs, but is the only lawful tenure by which the
>united States hold their existence as a nation."
>
> "A government that does not trust its law-abiding citizens to keep
> and bear arms is itself untrustworthy of trust."
> -- "Seditionist" James Madison,
>1751-1836
>
> "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the
> blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
> -- "Seditionist" Thomas Jefferson to William Smith, 11/13/1787
>
> "Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found
> out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed
> upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with
> either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are
> prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."
> -- "Seditionist" Frederick
>Douglas, 1857
>
> "No man shall be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason
> for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a
> last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
> -- "Seditionist"
>Thomas Jefferson
>
> "If the representatives of the People betray their constituents, there
> is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of
> self-defense." - "Seditionist" Alexander
>Hamilton
>
>And here is "an evil seditionist" from our time, discussing a well known
>"utopian peace enforcement system" being erected today in America,
>one very similar to that described in the writer's book, GULAG ARCHIPELAGO:
>
> "How we burned in the prison camps later thinking: What would
> things have been like if every (soviet) police operative, when he
> went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether
> he would return alive? "…if during periods of mass arrests people
> had not simply sat there in their lairs (apartments), paling with
> terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the
> staircase, but had understood they had nothing to lose and had
> boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen
> people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?
> …the organs (police) would very quickly have suffered a shortage
> of officers…and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed
> (Communist government) machine would have ground to a halt."
> "Seditionist" Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize winner, who
> spent 11 years in communist concentration camps.
>
>As "peace enforcers" of today we military and police officers cry,
>"HOW OUTRAGEOUS! Surely this man and all before him should have
>been put to death for even thinking, much less writing, such seditious,
>anti-government thoughts." But might we not suppose that the Jews
>probably had similar, "seditious" thoughts as they stood and awaited
>their fate in those "lawful," expedient and "politically correct" lines??
>
>"New age" cops and soldiers today ask: "Is not anyone who would have such
>"horrendously anti-government thoughts" - and surely anyone who might one day
>ACT UPON such thoughts - our government's enemy, and therefore our avowed
>target for destruction? After all, are we not
>blessed to be the ones our "omnipotent (government) deities" depend on
>to protect them from such protagonists so that they can complete their
>program for the "SAVING OF THE WORLD"?
>
>No question about it: If Madison, Jefferson, or any others of our
>"anti-government" founding fathers were alive in America today, we brother
>and sister officers and soldiers would be assigned to see to it that they
>were surveilled, persecuted, maligned, arrested, imprisoned and maybe killed
>by those presently in power. The Disciples of Christ Jesus were
>some of the most flagrant "seditionists" of their day. They and others
>like them, such as that impossible, hard-headed Moses before them
>started all this "anti-government" stuff in the first place. (Or did they?)
> Anyway, 'serves them right that they were arrested, tortured and killed
>for speaking against the legal authorities of the time, making "seditious,"
>"anti-government" remarks like,
>
> "We should obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29)
>
>Whereas the Christian ministers of revolutionary times actually LED the
>war against Britain (the then "lawful" government), today America's
>"Christian" ministers preach that it is not biblical to stand against the
>lawful government; that we should obey even evil governments
>because, they say, "All government is of God." This attitude is of great
>assistance to us New Age "peace" enforcement troops. For example
>then, a Christian of today should know that it's "against the 'law'" to hide
>a family of Jews in his attic. So, if you and I as the legal government
>representatives were to come to the door and inquire of such, this
>"good Christian" would tell us "peace enforcers" the truth and turn the
>fugitives in, right?! Therefore, with the Christian ministers assisting
>government control of the masses, it will be even easier and better
>accepted for us ENFORCERS to crush all "anti-government seditionists"
>when given the command. Think about it: Would our government
>leaders tell us to do anything wrong?
>
>Perhaps we should be thankful that these kinds of intolerant, lawless
>"rabble," such as Jesus' disciples and the Founding Fathers, are not
>around today; yet we'd better not relax, for we Enforcers are being
>instructed that there are signs - signs that some men and women are
>rising up today as in the past, against "lawful" governments all around
>the world, aspiring to please the Author of Liberty Himself, rather than
>the "thoughtful and kind" government leaders you and I serve and
>protect. Yes, there is a worrisome, dangerous, rag-tag movement
>growing, made up of allegedly God-loving, law-abiding, non-violent
>and patriotic Americans of all races and creeds, which is truly upsetting
>the plans of our government leaders who have succeeded to a great
>extent in socializing and communizing America. But, who are they?
>
>See WHO ARE AMERICA'S TP SEDITIONISTS TODAY? to find out...
>
>Aid & Abet Police Newsletter
>Published for members of Law Enforcement, Military, National and Coast Guard.
>
>Public is welcome.
>Publisher: Police Officer Jack McLamb, Ret.
>Editor: Police Officer A. Rick Dalton
>Writers: National Guardsman Fred Willoughby, Mr. Louis E. Stradling
>Marketing: Peter Giordano
>http://www.police-against-nwo.com/
>e-mail at: vampkil@police-against-nwo.com
>FAX (602) 237-2444 Ph. (602) 237-2533
>World HQ: Arizona USA
<snip>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail