Time: Sun Jul 20 12:37:18 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA08879 for [address in tool bar]; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 12:36:21 -0700 (MST) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA10217; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 12:33:57 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 12:33:30 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: The Environmental Establishment (fwd) For good background, read: "En Route to Global Occupation" by author Gary Kah. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com <snip> > >THE ENVIRONMENTAL ESTABLISHMENT VS. PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS > by: Richard Weyand > > >Who would ever thought that a Mexican spotted owl, the brown gizzly bear >or gray wolf would present one of the biggest threats to the American way >of life? Who would have imagined thirty years ago that the personal >automobile, commercial, residential developments and manufacturing firms >would be attacked by those considered virtuous in the public eye? Who >would dare believe that Americans would alter their thinking and behaviour >conforming to the many changes that local, state and federal governments >desire to meet their new standardsfor proper citizenship? What were the >reasons to severely restrict and to eventually eradicate the free market >system of economy? > >Is it ironic that the very best system of economy and the legal protection >of private property should be destroyed by opponents that are served by >that particular system? In reality, these opponents have no such interest >to protect your property rather they would plunder or regulate your >property. Currently, the evolutionary process of statism in this country >has taken the form of outright theft of property and the subsequent loss >of economic vitality. > >The ability to redistribute property from the have nots and haves to the >superhaves could not come about from a full frontal assault on property. >It would be very unlikely that the American public would ever stand for a >military coup d'etat from the superwealthy to take property away from a >ferociously independent mass of individuals. Perhaps in a South American >country or Russia where they have no concept of a Republican form of >government can a violent upheaval of the state and a transfer of property >rights be accomplished. Even though it has been tried, bolshevik methods >in changing the state have never worked in western industrial countries. >Success in transforming a constitutional Republican state into a socialist >democracy has come about through the 'rule of law'. By utilizing the >legal institutions of the courts and the legislature, the Establishment >has methodically and systematically turn the tables of absolute >constitutional rule to one of anarchy. No longer are institutions of >government, which are operated by the Establishment desires is a wholesale >transfer of property from one class to another without due compensation at >the market rate by using the rule of law or the Menshevik process. > >In the effort to shift assests from one group to another, no full scale, >physical war could be waged against the American public. What common >denominator would the American public accept in the war to transfer >property? The Establishment chose the environment as their idelogical >message. By pressing an educational assault on the hearts and minds of >gullible Americans, who witnessed the ravaging of streams, oceans, airways >and the land by conspicuously avaracious corporations, the public was >ready for a shift in public policy. Interestingly, big business observed >that this was an opportunity to stiff their competition. By using the >force of law, big business could exempt itself from the very laws that >were intentioned by an angry public, while smaller companies were >compelled to operate under these tougher regulations. > >Americans are barraged with environmental messages as to educate who are >villains and who are the paragons in the battle for property. As all >successful movements discover disgust, anger and guilt are especially >useful in changing behaviours and galvanizing reaction. Americans feel >sorry when they observe films of baby harp seals being brutely murdered >for their fur. An uneasy feeling comes across when we see the burning of >large tracts of Brazilian rain forest. It is a smooth shift for the >purveyors of environmental statism to demostrate not only the >international perdition of the environment, but the domestic side of >wreck-loose corporations stealing our national heritage. > >Take for example, the New World Mine incident where the company in the >1990's found gold reserves outside of Yellowstone National Park. In a >weekly radio address in August 1995, Bill Clinton complained that the >goldmining company was prepared to take away America's great natural >heritage. The President ordered a ban on the issuance of mining permits >near Yellowstone. Mind you the construction of such a project would employ >an additional 150 people at an average of $35,000 per year doubling the >per capita income in that region. The local economy would experience a >generation of come $15 million; a real shot in the arm. > >Sadly, the Interior Department enlisted the help of UNESCO, the United >Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to declare that >Yellowstone Park was now a World Heritage site. Apparently, Bruce Babbitt, >the Interior Secretary, could not utilize the existing domestic laws to >force out the Noranda Corporation who owned the New World Mine. It was the >Department of Agriculture's Forest Service that had control of the land >near the site. So Babbitt used the secular arm of the United Nations to >prevents the development of this land. > >The environmentalist's jihad has pread to every part of the country, but >more specifically to the west, where the Federal government owns over 50% >of the property and in some states nearly 90% of the land as is the case >in Nevada. > >What little private property is left, the Federal government has invoked >the Environment Species Act. The ecosocialists have used the canine teeth >of such legislation to erode the purchase, sale and use of private >property parcels. Once the bureaucrat makes the claim of a privilege >creature, the owner must set aside or reserve a portion for the creature's >habitat. At their discretion BLM, Fish & Wildlife or Forest Service may >give you the privilege to use the other portion of land. However, they may >decide to confiscate it outright if the property is choice or their find >the owner little more outspoken about their policies. > >In a case close to home, prior to NAFTA, the U.S. and Mexico signed the La >Paz Agreement or Border 21, which would protect and improve the >environment at the border region 60 miles on both sides of the border. As >part of the NAFTA agreement an environmental side provision was signed >that would make Border 21 a reality. This agreement provides funding for >the creation of the Border Environment Cooperation Project and the North >American Development Bank. This will literally create a new region >combining Mexico and the U.S., Ten million people living in the region >will be at the mercy of various agencies. In fact, 75% of private land >must be reserved for endangered species in this region and remaining 25% >will be allowed for development. A combination of Mexican and American >agencies will monitor and enforce the provisions of Border 21. Biolators >will receive stiff penalties: jail time, fines and possible loss of >property. > >After the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, Clinton vowed to pursue a vigorous >plan implementing the ideas reached at the conference. Part of this >implementing plan was the creation of the President's Council on >Sustainable Development. The Council's reports provide for how the >domestic policy can be integrated with the achievements toward "economic >progress, environmental protection and social equity". I won't go into >the massive educational program that Washington policy wants to promote >instilling these socialist values into young and impressionable minds. >However, it is vital for the Establishment to inculcate the new generation >into believing that Sustainable Development is not only workable, but >necessary for the continuance of the planet, while they becomes the slaves >to the Establishment. > >On the state level, last year I spoke on SMOG CHECK II or California's >execution of the 1990 Clean Air Act. This is another method in which to >alter the behaviour of Americans. Not only will the loss of an automobile >to state or local agencies or an oil company mean property seizure, but a >tremendous attenuation of freedom. > >May I say, if you have not called your state sneator or assemblyman on >this subject may I implore that you do tomorrow. Autos four years and >older will not pass the new emission regulations. And though there is no >direct legal link between the United Nation's agenda and the laws passed >in the state, there is considerable influence from United Nation's >conferences and various environmental groups. What you are witnessing >here in this state has an indirect connection to what is promted at for >example the United Nation's Earth Summit II held in June 1997 in New York >City. Because this Summit was discussing reductions in 'green-house >gases' by industrial nations and since our President declared that the >United States was not performing to the determination at the first Earth >Summit in Rio, governmental and non-governmental organizations will work >diligently to accomplish these resolutions. We have already seen the ban >of distributing and selling of freon for consumers, the placement of MTBE >in the gasoline to supposedly reduce carbon monoxide pollution, the EPA's >new particulate standards that go into effect July which will end the life >of many trucking firms. What new rules will these governing bodies think >of next when they attend global conferences such as Earth Summit II. >Translation of this monstrous imposition are losses of freedom, property >and livelihood for most Americans. > >To advance the property transfer agenda further, the Establishment aspires >to employ the Wildlands Project. The brainchild of environmentalist >journalist Reed Noss, Earth First's David Foreman and the United Nations >Environmental Programme, they propose a network of wildlife reserves, >human buffer zones and wildlife corridors across the continent. They are >speaking of millions of acres reserved for animals without human >habitation. This prodigious project requires 23% for only animal use and >another 26% for very limited human use. Most roads would be closed, some >would be ripped out; nothing less than the transformation into wilderness >with an archipelago of human inhabited islands. A forced relocation of >tens of millions of people would be requisite. A scheme to create an >American Kampuchea in the name of "biodiversity" has been endorsed by a >number organizations such as the World Resources Institute and the Nature >Conservancy. > >>From the face of it Americans are quite attracted to anything that will >improve the conditions of their environment, but can the American public >swallow a vision to take us back to a period that we so struggled for >thousands of years to escape. > >Let me show on videotape what that vision entails. "Behind the Green >Curtain" gives one of the better accounts where ecosocialism and >Establishment want to take us. > >As a final thought on this subject of environmentalism, the Protestant >church has taken the cudgels to protect the environment through the >destruction of private property. A movement toward Christian >environmentalism being called by various names such as Evangelical >Environmental Network, the Noah Congregation and the Creation Care >Theology. Basically this movement places animals at par or above human >existence in contradiction to the Genesis account. Surprisingly, many >unwitting Christian Churches over the spectrum of Protestantism support >such views from this cause. Apparently organizations such as World Vision, >Fuller Theological Seminary, Youth for Christ and prominent leftist >evangelicals like Ronald Sider, Calvin DeWitt, Donald McKenna accept this >movement's tenets. Actually, this foolishness and demagogery is coming >from the Environmental Protection Agency and Secretary of Interior Bruce >Babbitt manipulating the Christian Bible tofit the projection of an >eco-socialist society. To receive an entirely different view of >humanity's role on earth you can call Evangelicals for Environmental >Stewardship at (202) 543-1286. Or you can read Genesis 1:27-29 on our >role. As to the protection of property read Exodus 20:15 and Exodus >22:1-14. > >Tomorrow, I want you to call your Congressman and other Congressmen to get >Don Young's (R-AK) H.R. 1146 or the American Sovereignty Restoration Act >which would take us out of the United Nations. If you read the John Birch >Society Bulletin, you would find that this bill was attached to a State >Department authorization bill H.R. 1757 and as an amendment it was >defeated handily on June 4th. However, 54 courageous congressment did >vote in favor. Sonny Bono was not one, though he co-sponsored the >measure. Get on his tail for not voting on this measure. It will be >brought up again at a latter date, if it gets out of committee. > >Richard Weyand >Hemet, CA > > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with >"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject) >Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com> > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail