Time: Mon Jul 21 16:51:25 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA23432; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:49:39 -0700 (MST) id TAA22143; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 19:45:34 -0400 (EDT) id TAA22083; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 19:45:26 -0400 (EDT) id AA29655; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 19:45:25 -0400 by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA26504; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:37:35 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:37:04 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SNET: SLS: "interstate commerce" [sic] References: <3.0.3.16.19970720210240.36376f2e@pop.primenet.com> -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List Since the (corporate) state is a holder in due course of the MSO, registration of your (their) "vehicle" creates the presumption that said vehicle will be used in interstate commerce. All vehicles so registered are presumed to be in interstate commerce. See the Commerce Clause: Congress can regulate commerce among the several states (but NOT among the inhabitants of the several states); there is a very crucial difference. So, by becoming a holder in due course of the MSO, the state can then proceed on the basis of the (rebuttable) presumption that your vehicle is being used for purposes of interstate commerce, because interstate highways pass through every state, and because of a ton of other reasons. In their minds, EVERYTHING is commerce, even the air you breathe, and the food you eat. This widespread fraud is also intricately intertwined with the invasion of the several states by federal municipal law, gold-fringed flags, martial rule, summary jurisdictions, and the like. To break this presumption, you must first sue out the commercial paper which the state is holding in due course: this paper is the MSO. From that key point of departure, you can then build your challenge to this fraud. But, be forewarned: the state will do everything it can to scuttle your case (the negative precedent would be just too costly). Always bear in mind: you have a right to require a de jure court to decide on the basis of facts which are in evidence. That is the main reason why the Supreme Law Firm spends so much time and energy on building a foundation. "The man who builds his house upon sand, can expect it to get washed away during the very next Tucson monsoon!" [Paul Mitchell, taking liberties with the Holy Bible] This "admiralty" jurisdiction is exactly the same de facto jurisdiction about which Thomas Jefferson complained so eloquently in the Declaration of Independence. Read it and you will begin to see the contemporary parallels, particularly as regards "traffic" and transportation -- an essential economic activity. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 02:43 AM 7/21/97 -0700, you wrote: >[snip] > Since the state has a >> legal interest in it, your use of that "vehicle" >> is construed legally as "interstate commerce" -- >> i.e. commerce among the several states, even if >> you operate it intra-state. >[snip] > >Hi Paul. I could not not follow this last jump of logic. Can you >explain a little more of this particular step? > >> /s/ Paul Mitchell >> http://www.supremelaw.com > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com -> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail