Time: Mon Jul 21 21:26:29 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA00395 for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 21:26:51 -0700 (MST) by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA12990; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 21:24:30 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 21:24:01 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Top Three Censored Stories: North America and the Globe (fwd) <snip> > >The Globe and Mail, Canada's only national newspaper, asked for top-five >or top-ten lists of censored stories. The example they gave was a right >wing list of stories censored by the "lib-left" media, but the tone of the >write-up made it obvious the editor in question was no Republican. If >anyone else wants to submit a list, Kelly and I have made the case for >prohibiton (see below) in great detail, so feel free to make the list a >very brief one (a la Letterman) that the editor will actually have room to >publish (if y'all feel like a break from the ol' lte format;) > Chris > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 19:21:09 -0300 (ADT) >From: Chris Donald <ai256@chebucto.ns.ca> >To: Focus@globeandmail.ca >Subject: Top Three Censored Stories: North America and the Globe > >Top three censored stories; all are Canada-specific but easily >adapted to cover North America. > >From: Chris Donald >via the internet > >Top Censored Story: > the plight of patients who use cannabis, or need to use cannabis, >for the medical uses endorsed in an editorial by the The New England >Journal of Medicine. > > My aunt died beside a toilet last year soon after cancer >treatment; apparently she was too nauseous to keep down the prescription >anti-emetics, and had no inhalable anti-emetic (cannabis) on hand because >she would not break the law. Misinformation on this subject might ensure >pharmaceutical company bottom-lines, but it is killing patients. > The head of the AIDS Coalition of Nova Scotia, Wilson Hodder, who >consumes 44 pills a day for AIDS treatment, recently told me that there is >not a single anti-emetic, analgesic, or appetite stimulant made by any >pharmaceutical company that is as good as cannabis, and that his personal >experience is shared by almost every survivor of AIDS that he knows. >Cannabis allows him to consume those pill cocktails and not die from the >side-effects, but there are billions of dollars at stake if cancer, AIDS, >MS, and chronic pain patients have legal access to cannabis to replace >certain pharmaceuticals. > Recently an Edinburgh paper announced that there is a THC pill >being tested on MS patients in Great Britain, but this and other medical >tests are routinely ignored by the Globe, while MS patients in Canada >break the law daily, and hope for selective enforcement of Canada's new >controlled substances law (formerly C-8) from our countries over-burdened >police. Any law that must be selectively enforced to be justly enforced is >a BAD LAW. > In North America we don't hear about the recent call for the >legalization of cannabis for medical testing by the British Medical >Association, yet in our country any pharmacology professor dependent on >pharmaceutical industry grants can call themselves an expert, and blandly >announce in the medium of their choice that they have grave doubts about >as yet unproven side effects of cannabis. > All over North America references in the media to cannabis in a >context of criminality outnumber all other cannabis references by a huge >margin. While the Globe has amply documented the impotence of the >scientists at Health Canada, and the inordinate influence that large >multi-national pharmaceutical companies have on the drug approval process, >the influence of these multi-billion dollar conglomerates on national drug >policy is conveniently ignored. > How much revenue does the Globe and Mail receive from >manufacturers and retailers of pharmaceuticals? Is that why the rare >medical study of cannabis you print usually quotes a US bureaucrat wildly >exaggerating any potential negative spin that can be found? No wonder Bill >C-8 was passed as written (by the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers >Association?), despite the Canadian Senate blasting it for continuing the >prohibition of cannabis, and continuing to make criminals of medical >patients who use cannabis. > >Censored Story 2: > Canada's abysmally high rate of incarcerating our own citizens, >and the high percentage of this prisoner boom that is arrested, tried, and >jailed solely for non-violent enfractions of our government's prohibition >laws. > > If you lump the former Soviet Union together, Canada is behind >only the US, South Africa, and the hapless Soviets for having the highest >percentage of our own citizens in jail. Why can the Australians, Germans, >Dutch, Swiss, Scandinavians, French, British, etc., have functioning, >industrialized countries with so many fewer people in jail? > Besides causing a boom in prison and court building (the Harris >government found 200 MILLION for court building alone this year, while >cutting everything but the police to the bare bones), and shielding police >budgets from serious cuts, the "War" on cannabis users costs Canadian >taxpayers a further $38-48,000 a year per cannabis incarceree; a lot more >than taxpayers in most western countries are willing to pay. > Of course, with the Canadian media limiting the information >available to base informed choices on, most Canadian tax-payers are >blissfully unaware of exactly what they are paying for when our >politicians cynically pursue the "War on Drugs" to make "Tough on Crime" >brownie points with ill-informed voters. > How will those "War on Drugs" advocates react - how will YOU react >- when a loved one is dying beside a toilet, vomiting, and unable to >swallow an ineptly designed, pill form anti-nausea pharmaceutical? If you >are like most people, you will probably ask a younger colleague or one of >your kids to score some pot. The prohibition that keeps cannabis out of >the hands of a dying aunt ensures that every neighbourhood kid has access. > The Globe and Mail, with many other mainstream media, is not >guiltless in the creation and maintenance of this pathetic and embarrassing >status quo. As our nation's only national newspaper, the scope of your >abuse of power is just more damning. I sincerely hope no one loved by a >Globe staffer ever gets cancer, or AIDS, or MS... > >Censored Story 3: > because it is a recent story, and ignored by over half of the >mainstream print media in North America, the burying of the results of the >four year Swiss heroin prescription trial by the Globe and Mail ranks >highly in terms of censoring news that would call into question current >prohibition polices. > > On July 10, the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health issued the >results of a four year trial which prescribed heroin, not jail, to >addicts. With a vast sample (over 800) of hard core users, many of whom >had repeatedly been in trouble with the law, had failed out of other >maintenance programs, and all of whom were in a high risk category for >contracting AIDS, the trial was summed up in a single, dismissively toned >AP article as: crime dropped 60%, rate of unemployment among addicts >dropped by half, endemic homelessness disappeared, and Swiss tax-payers >were pleased to note that many on welfare were able to get jobs, and those >previously depending on crime and prostitution were able to survive on >welfare. Of course, a notably high percentage of the participants were >able to get off of heroin. > Shouldn't officials in Vancouver or Toronto know about this? How >far behind these two cities is the hard drug problem in the rest of urban >Canada? Previous studies have shown that only a small percentage of "hard" >drug addicts are responsible for most of the crime associated with >addiction, and yet a program that deals directly with this group of >problem users, with stunning results, is ignored in North America. Of >course the rate of increase in HIV infection among the group almost >disappeared, but I'm sure youths in large cities across Canada already >knew that would result, even if the Globe and Mail didn't bother telling >them. How can simplistic sloganeering like "Just Say No" effect a >generation that knows more about harm reduction than the editors of our >nation's national newpaper and most of our country's elected officials? > [I include a summation of the trial results as Appendix I] > > Chris Donald > * * * > >APPENDIX I: summation of the recent four year Swiss study > > For Immediate Release: July 10, 1997 > > SWISS GOVERNMENT REPORT: > HEROIN PRESCRIPTION WORKS > > Crime Dropped, Illicit Drug Use Fell and Patient Health Improved > > > The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health issued a report today which > included the results of an experimental heroin prescription program. > The report found that crime dropped by 60%, unemployment among > participants fell by half, and the general and nutritional health of > participants improved rapidly during the prescription program. The > program, which began in January 1994 and continued through December > 1996, eventually prescribed heroin to over 800 heroin addicts in 15 > cities. > > "This report proves that heroin maintenance is a feasible option > for cities trying to reduce the harm associated with heroin > addiction," said Dr. Ethan Nadelmann, Director of the Lindesmith > Center, a drug policy research think tank. "As the U.S. and other > countries consider alternatives to treating heroin addiction, it is > critical that all options, including the prescription of heroin and > other drugs, are considered as viable means to reducing crime and > improving public health." > > Specific results of the report include: > >Both the number of offenders and the number of criminal offenses > decreased by about 60% during the first six months of treatment. > > >Most illicit drug use, including that of cocaine, rapidly and > markedly declined, whereas benzodiazepine use decreased only slowly > and alcohol and cannabis consumption hardly declined at all. > > >The number of participants unemployed fell by more than half (from > 44% to 20%). > > >Participants' housing situation rapidly improved (in particular, > there were no longer any homeless). > > >Physical health improved during treatment (in physical terms, this > relates especially to general and nutritional status and > injection-related skin diseases). > > >More than half of the program drop outs switched to another form of > treatment, including abstinence. > > >Court convictions decreased significantly (according to the central > criminal register). > > >One third of patients who, on admission, were dependent on welfare > required no further support. On the other hand, others who were > dependent on illicit income turned to welfare support. > > >Retention rate in the study, 89% over a period of 6 months and 69% > over a period of 18 months, proved to be above average when compared > with other treatment programs for heroin dependents. > > >No disturbance of note was caused to the local neighborhoods, or if > so only temporarily. > > A summary of the report is available on the Lindesmith Center's web > site at: www.lindesmith.org/presumm.html. Based in New York, the > Lindesmith Center is a drug policy research institute that > concentrates on broadening the drug policy debate. The guiding > principle of the center is harm reduction, an alternative approach to > drug policy and treatment that focuses on minimizing the adverse > effects of both drug use and drug prohibition. Particular attention > is paid to analyzing the experiences of foreign countries in reducing > drug-related harms. > > The Lindesmith Center is a project of the Open Society Institute. > Founded by philanthropist George Soros, the Open Society Institute > promotes the development of open societies around the world through > projects relating to education, media, legal reform and human rights. > The center's founder and director is Ethan Nadelmann, J.D., Ph.D. > author of Cops Across Borders: The Internationalization of U.S. > Criminal Law Enforcement (Penn State Press, 1993) as well as numerous > articles on drug control policy which have appeared in leading > scholarly and popular journals. > > Media Contact: > Ty Trippet > Director of Communications > The Lindesmith Center > 212-887-0604 > ttrippet@sorosny.org > > NOTE: The full text of the report is available on our web site at > www.lindesmith.org/presumm.html. > > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail