Time: Wed Jul 23 05:50:15 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA26971 for [address in tool bar]; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 05:47:54 -0700 (MST) by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA08011; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 05:46:57 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 05:46:26 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Book Review: "Impeachment: Restraining an Overactive Judiciary" (fwd) Restraining a Criminal Judiciary, maybe? /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com <snip> > >Book Review: >"Impeachment: Restraining an Overactive Judiciary" by David Barton > >Today, many would characterize America's Judicial branch as "out of >control." Ruled by the whims of a few judges, America has become >somewhat of an oligarchy. Have we come to the point where the courts >rule instead of the people? Let's take a look at the following list of >cases in which the will of the people was disdained: > >o "In LULAC v. Wilson and Gregorio T. v. Wilson, the courts suspended >the results of the California vote to withhold State-funded taxpayer >services from those who are ILLEGALLY in the country" [*1] > >o "In U. S. Term Limits v. Thornton and Thorsted v. Munro, the courts >overturned the results of elections in which citizens in Arkansas and >Washington had voted to limit the terms of their elected officials" [*2] > >o "In Romer v. Evans, the courts overturned a constitutional amendment >approved by Colorado citizens to forbid awarding special, rather than >just equal rights to homosexuals." [*3] > >These examples and more can be found in David Barton's New Book, >"Impeachment: Restraining an Overactive Judiciary." In this book Barton >explains the current condition of the federal judiciary and why >impeachment is necessary. Quoting the founders themselves, he gives a >basic history of impeachment and it's original intent, and contrasts it >to the modern philosophy of impeachment. While today we believe that >impeachment is only possible when a public official has committed a >criminal offense or violated a statutory law [*4], historically >impeachment proceedings have commenced for offences such as issuing an >order that contradicted an act of Congress (today such an order would >overturn the act of Congress), "judicial high-handedness", blasphemy, >excluding evidence from a trial, misconduct, and trying to hide assets >during divorce proceedings.[*5] President Andrew Johnson was almost >impeached for "removing and replacing the Secretary of War." [*6] > >Barton also answers common objections, such as, "Does Impeachment >Violate the Independence of the Judiciary?" and most importantly tells >us what we can do. > >While I still believe that impeachment is a procedure of last resort, >after having read this book, I am convinced that it is a constitutional >measure that we must consider. While this book is directed primarily >toward the judicial branch, you'll find that much of it applies also to >the executive branch as well. > >Here is one of the many quotes that this book includes: > >[T]he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws >are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own >sphere of action but for the legislature and executive also in their >spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch. [T]o consider the >judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a >very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the >despotism of an oligarchy.... The Constitution has erected no such >single tribunal. [*7] > >-Thomas Jefferson > >Reviewed by John Vinci >---- > >If you'd like a copy of this book please send $6.00 (ret. 6.95) plus >$3.50 shipping and handling to: > >Books for a Better America >20145 Van Aken Blvd. #220 >Cleveland, OH 44122 > >Name: >Address: >City, State, Zip: >E-mail: >Phone: > > >__Check Make Checks Payable to: Books for a Better America > >__Credit Card > > __ Visa __ Mastercard __ Discover (Novus) > >Card # |__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__| > >Name on Card ____________________________ Expires ________ > >Signature __________________________ > >* Footnotes are all from "Impeachment: Restraining an Overactive >Judiciary" and are available upon request > >-- >John Vinci -- jvinci@cybergate.net >o Books for a Better America: http://www.webcom.com/bba >o One Nation Under God: http://www.webcom.com/bba/onug > -An E-Newsletter on America's Christian Heritage. > -If you don't have web access, e-mail me and I'll put you on the list. > > -When you subscribe I'll send you a FREE copy of the opinion of the > author of the First Amendment, Fisher Ames, on the Bible in Schools! > >o Colonial Hall: http://www.webcom.com/bba/ch > -A look at America's Founders >------- >To subscribe to c-news, send the message SUBSCRIBE C-NEWS, or the message >UNSUBSCRIBE C-NEWS to unsubscribe, to majordomo@world.std.com. Contact >owner-c-news@world.std.com if you have questions. > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail