Time: Mon Jul 28 15:35:11 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA28242;
Mon, 28 Jul 1997 15:27:37 -0700 (MST)
by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA03621;
Mon, 28 Jul 1997 13:45:36 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 13:44:54 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: DOJ REPLY BRIEF in U.S.A. v. Gilbertson
The attached .ZIP file is compressed by PKZIP
and encoded with BinHex. Please advise
if you want MIME or Uuencode.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
attachment: DOJREPLY.ZIP (620K compressed)
Attachment Converted: "I:\ATTACH\DOJREPLY.zip"
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]From ???@??? Mon Jul 28 15:13:21 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA20655;
Mon, 28 Jul 1997 15:13:41 -0700 (MST)
by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA10032;
Mon, 28 Jul 1997 15:06:53 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 15:06:11 -0700
To: "bcheek@san.rr.com" <bcheek@san.rr.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Snoopy Microsoft - BEWARE (fwd)
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the great insights here.
I have been actively evaluating Windows
95 for 5 months. Here is my present
thinking:
Right now, the cost of being wrong for
staying with 3.11 is much smaller, and
much more manageable, than being wrong
for switching to Windows 95, and giving
MS a back door to 7 years of dedicated
research in constitutional law. I have
several other reasons why Windows 95 is
just not cost-justified for me yet, not
the least of which is that Eudora Pro
has the same table-space problems in
their 32-bit version for Win95.
Sooooo, it looks like I pay a lot, and don't
get very much on the margin, by switching
at this point in time. I should add that
I have been tuning these two systems for
several YEARS, and I don't have a whole
LOT of terrible complaints as of now. I know
where the holes are, and I can avoid them most
of the time. I miss the days when I had
access to ALL the source code, and we could
just jump in, patch the bug, recompile and
reload, and install a better program.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
At 11:42 AM 7/28/97 -0700, you wrote:
>
>> Paul Mitchell hereby announces that he will remain
>> with Windows 3.11 until further notice.
>
>>> Subject: Snoopy Microsoft - BEWARE (fwd)
>
>Ooooohhhhhh......not THAT again? <Groan>
>
>Well, whatever......I am a Microsoft "insider" of sorts, too, and
>I can report that the subject matter of your referenced e-mail
>is a bunch of FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt), in my humble
>opinion. The zealots from the OS/2 encampment resurrect
>that crap about every six months and spew it over the bitstream.
>
>If you are inclined to believe it, for whatever reasons of your
>own, then at least look into installing Windows For WorkGroups 3.11,
>as opposed to the crippled, sluggard, plain Windows 3.11. Just
>between thee and me, however.....Windows 95 is safe and secure
>to an extent that overshadows any prior version.
>
>Of course, most anything is secure so long as it is either turned OFF
>or at least not connected to anything else. But when you connect to
>the Internet, then you need security.....and Win95's security is
>clearly
>stronger than any of its predecessors. NT4.0, of course, is better
>still,
>but that might be overkill for your situation.
>
>Understandably, you need security. You do not need FUD.
>
>I guess it helps to be in my position of relative mastery of computer
>hardware and software, such that weaknesses and holes are more
>easily understood and dealt with. But then, I am not a
>lawyer.....which
>enjoys a comparable position in a different world.
>
>Best regards....whatever your choices.
>
>+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
>| Bill Cheek ~ COMMtronics Engineering ~ World Scanner Report |
>| PO Box 262478 ~ San Diego, CA 92196-2478 |
>| Busn-Voice: (619) 578-9247 (1:30pm-5:30pm, PDT) FAX: anytime |
>| E-mail: bcheek@san.rr.com |
>| WWWeb Site: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek |
>| or: http://204.210.20.47 |
>| FTP Sites: ftp://ftp.cts.com/pub/bcheek or ftp.204.210.20.47 |
>+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail