Time: Wed Jul 30 06:43:17 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA00073; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 05:54:22 -0700 (MST) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA12105; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 05:53:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 05:52:50 -0700 To: snetnews@world.std.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: A SOLUTION TO THE FRAUD STATE (fwd) I disagree. Words can change a lot. Take the following, for example: E = M x C^2 -or- E = M * C ** 2 (in FORTRAN) These brief symbols have moved mountains. Here's another: I am not a federal citizen. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 06:24 AM 7/30/97 -0600, you wrote: > >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List > >>Evan Greetings ! >>Very well stated and good points. I enjoyed reading your post. But >>truthfully Evan, words will not change much. There is such a noise in the >>market place now , that even something as level-headed, and thought out as >>your thoughts on the " Fraud " state will go unheard or largely unheeded. >> >> I do not think that the beautiful goddess of Democracy should be so >>looked down upon by the examples of Mobocracy. It is my contention that >>Democracy has not yet been fully understood, and is in a sense the >>greatest threat to what you describe as Bureaucratic Oppression. It is my >>contention that Democratia, has not even sprouted into the garden of >>experiential reality. >snip--- >>Elections should be a process which should be held in sacredness, and >>preciousness. A foundation stone of a free society , of mutual respect, >>and community concern. It should not be what it is now become,a sham, a >>media presentation, a Electronic Circus Maximus . >> But anyway enough of my wiseacring, I have said already too much, what >>many would consider the babbling of a loquacious idiot. I believe that you >>will get my point from what I have said. >> > >Dear Biophilos, > >Thanks for your sincerely-written letter! >... and certainly not "babbling," in my opinion. :-) > >Regarding your statement that "words will not change much" -- > >I both agree and disagree (depending, I suppose, upon interpretation.) > >Explanation: > >In "the middle of the Watts Riot," (for instance) words would INDEED not >change much.... except maybe the words "duck" and "run"! > >By the time of such a riot, or any other such major, volitional, divergent >oscillation, it is indeed too late for words....they will fall on deaf, >violently-oriented brains. > >I suppose it is also true that "words are too late" for any American >content to become a couch potato, watch soap operas (or the equivalent) and >"pull a lever once every few years" for a political candidate with the most >"sex appeal." > >In the sense of the above, "words are indeed too late." > >But in another sense, words can be a powerful tool -- much more so than the >sword in the long run. > >Example: The Declaration of Independence. > >It's just a document full of "words." > >Yet those words stirred the imagination of many Americans in >1776....especially a certain group of "intellectuals." And who were these >"intellectuals" at that time? A Parisian artists/writers society? No. A >group of tenured professors at an ivy league college? No. > >These particular intellectuals were compatriots of Thomas Paine: Thomas >Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, David Rittenhouse, etc. > >We, as the operational descendants of such "intellectuals", were most >fortunate to have individuals of such quality co-poised to launch a new >country....at the right time and at the right place. > >Had we the pseudo-intellectuals of the "Marx and Lenin" variety around in >1776, I'm afraid the American Revolution would have taken a different turn. > >Of course, much volitional entropy has accumulated in the intervening 200+ >years. Our present socialistic culture is the resultant sludge of such >volitional entropy. > >I would also totally agree with your words, > >"There is no doubt that our present era is at a turning point, a crossroads >of great challenge." > >I believe it will be those who treasure the creation of the 2nd Phase of >the American Revolution who will be instrumental in helping to realize that >great challenge. > >I will soon be posting some words regarding "DEMOCRACY." > >And thanks again for your "words" -- they were very meaningful for me. > >Best regards, > >Evan Soule' > > > > > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: josephnewman@earthlink.net (Evan Soule) > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail