Time: Wed Jul 30 06:43:47 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA16176;
	Wed, 30 Jul 1997 06:32:25 -0700 (MST)
	by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA13524;
	Wed, 30 Jul 1997 06:30:29 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 06:29:45 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: 4th American Revolution (fwd)

>From: jvallaster@itexas.net (James Vallaster)
>To: "Paul Andrew Mitchell" [address in tool bar]
>Subject: 4th American Revolution
>Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 17:28:16 -0500
>
>
>
>Subject:      4th American Revolution
>From:         thor@rest.is.net (ronnie smith)
>Date:         1996/06/13
>
>  Article Segment 102 of 158
>  (Get Previous Segment)
>  (Get All 158 Segments)
>
>	The United States thereafter entered the second World War
>during which time the "League of Nations" was instituted under
>pretense of the "United Nations", and the "Bank For International
>Settlements" reinstated under pretense of the  "Bretton Woods
>Agreement" as the "International Monetary Fund" (The Fund) and the
>"International Bank For Reconstruction And Development" (The Bank).
>
>     The United States as a corporate body politic (artificial), came
>out of World War II in worse economic shape than when it entered, and
>in 1950 declared Bankruptcy and "Reorganization".  The Reorganization
>is located in Tile 5 of United States Codes Annotated.  The
>"Explanation" at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most informative
>reading.  The "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as the "Receiver"
>in Bankruptcy.  The United States went down the road and periodically
>filed for further Reorganization.  Things and situations worsened,
>having done what they were Commanded NOT to do, and in 1965 passed the
>"Coinage Act of 1965", completely debasing the Constitutional Coin
>(gold & silver i.e. Dollar).  At the signing of the Coinage Act on
>July 23, 1965, Lyndon B. Johnson stated in his Press Release that:
>
>	"When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the
>first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years.  The Coinage Act
>of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792.  And that Act had the title:  An
>Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United
>States...."
>
>	"Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our
>coinage system since the 18th Century we have no idea of returning to
>it."
>
>	It is important to take cognizance of the fact that NO
>Constitutional Amendment was ever obtained to FUNDAMENTALLY  "CHANGE",
>amend, abridge or abolish the Constitutional mandates, provisions or
>prohibitions, but due to internal and external diversions surrounding
>the Viet Nam War etc., the usurpation and breach went basically
>unchallenged and unnoticed by the general public at large, who became
>"a wealthy man's cannon fodder or cheap source of slave labor."
>Congress was clearly delegated the Power and Authority to regulate and
>maintain the true and inherent "value" of the Coin within the scope
>and purview of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 5 & 6 and Article I,
>Section 10, Clause 1, of the ordained Constitution (1787), and
>further, under a corresponding duty and obligation to maintain said
>gold and silver Coin and Foreign Coin at and within the necessary and
>proper "equal weights and measures" clause.
>
>	Those exercising the Offices of the several States, in equal
>measure, knew such "De Facto Transitions" were unlawful and
>unauthorized; but sanctioned, implemented and enforced the complete
>debauchment and the resulting "governmental, social, industrial
>economic change" in the "De Jure" States and in United States of
>America, and were and are now under the delusion that they can do both
>directly and indirectly what they were absolutely prohibited from
>doing.
>
>	In 1966, Congress being severely compromised, passed the
>Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, by which the entire taxing and monetary
>system i.e. "Essential Engine" was placed under the Uniform Commercial
>Code.  The Uniform Commercial Code was of course promulgated by the
>National Conferences Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws in
>collusion with the American Law Institute for the "banking and
>business interests."  The United States being engaged in numerous U.S.
>conflicts, including the Korean and the Viet Nam conflicts, which were
>under the direction of the United Nations [See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287d], and
>agreeing to foot the bill [See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287j], and not being able
>to honor their obligations and rehypothecated debt credit, openly and
>publicly dishonored and disavowed their "Notes" and "obligations" [12
>U.S.C.A. 411] i.e. "Federal Reserve Notes" through Public Law 90-269,
>Section 2, 82 Stat. 50 (1968) to wit:
>
>Subject:      4th American Revolution
>From:         thor@rest.is.net (ronnie smith)
>Date:         1996/06/13
>
>  Article Segment 103 of 158
>  (Get Previous Segment)
>  (Get All 158 Segments)
>
>	"Sec. 2. The first sentence of section 15 of the Federal
>Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 391) is amended by striking 'and the funds
>provided in the Act for the redemption of Federal Reserve notes'."
>
>	Things steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, President
>Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an "emergency" because
>the Postal Employees struck against the de facto government (?) for
>higher pay, due to inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit." [See:
>Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 596]  Nixon placed the U.S. Postal
>Department under control of the "Department of Defense." [See:
>Department Of The Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 (1969 ed.)]
>
>	"The System has been faltering for decade, but the bench mark
>date of the collapse is put at August 15 1971.  On this day, President
>Nixon reversed U.S. international monetary policy by officially
>declaring the non-convertibility of the U.S. dollar [F.R.N.] into
>gold."
>
>	On September 21, 1973, Congress passed Public Law 93-110,
>amending the Bretton Woods Par Value Modification Act, 82 Stat. 116,
>[31 U.S.C.A.449], and reiterated the "Emergency", [12 U.S.C.A. 95a],
>and section 8 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act of 1945 [22 U.S.C.A.
>286f], and which included "reports of foreign currency transactions."
>[Also see, Executive Order No. 10033]  This act further declared in
>Section 2(b) that:
>
>	"No provision of any law in effect on the date of enactment of
>this Act, and no rule, regulation, or order under authority of any
>such law, may be construed to prohibit any person from purchasing,
>holding, selling, or otherwise dealing with gold."
>
>	On January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt noted for the record, a
>second "Declaration Of INTERdependence" and clearly identified the
>U.N. as a "Communist" organization, and that they were seeking both
>production and monetary control over the Union and the People through
>International Organization promoting the "One World Order." [8
>U.S.C.A. 1101 (40)]  also see, [50 U.S.C.A. 781 & 783]
>
>	The socio/economic situation worsened as noted in the
>Complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claim, Docket No 41-76,
>on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal Judges, Atkins et al. vs. U.S..
>Atkins et al. complained that "As a result of inflation, the
>compensation of federal judges have been substantially diminished each
>year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to
>plaintiffs....the real value of the dollar decreased by approximately
>34.5 percent from March 15th, 1969 to October 1, 1975....As a result,
>plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings",
>and in the prayer for relief claimed "damages for the constitutional
>violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his
>earnings for the entire period since March 9, 1969."  It is quite
>apparent that the persons holding and enjoying Offices of Public
>Trust, Honor and/or Profit knew of the emergency emergent problem and
>sought protection for themselves, to the damage and injury of the
>People and Children, who were classified as "a club that has many
>other members" who "have no remedy."  And knowing that "heinous" acts
>had been committed, stated that they [judges/lawyers] would not apply
>the Law, nor would any substantive remedy be applied (checked more or
>less, but never stopped) "until all of us [judges] are dead."  Such
>persons Fraudulently swore an Oath to uphold, defend and preserve the
>sovereignty of the Nation and several Republican States of the Union,
>and breached the Duty to protect the People/Citizens and their
>Posterity from fraud, imposition, avarice and stealthy encroachment.
>This is verified in Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5944,
>which states:
>
>	"Moving to a floating exchange rate for international commerce
>means private enterprise and not central governments bear the risk of
>currency fluctuations."
>
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail