Time: Wed Jul 30 12:50:39 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA14273;
Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:50:52 -0700 (MST)
by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA27121;
Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:47:04 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:46:19 -0700
To: Patrick Arnold <paarnold@intwiz.wizards.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLF: DOJ does not read pleadings, U.S.A. v. Gilbertson
>
References: <3.0.3.16.19970729195652.3cc7a358@pop.primenet.com>
Many thanks, Patrick. Send $25 in cash
or blank U.S. Postal Money Order to:
Supreme Law Publishers c/o
5460 E. Speedway Blvd., #B-106/350
Tucson 85712/tdc
ARIZONA STATE
"Blank USPMO" means the "PAY TO" line
is left blank; you may complete the
buyer's half (right-hand side), as needed.
We will ship within 24 hours ARO.
Thanks again.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 12:43 PM 7/30/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Patrick Arnold paarnold@wizards.net 13:00hrs Pacific 7-30-97 Where do i
>send US$25.?
>
>On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> We would be most honored if you would
>> collect the $25 necessary to purchase
>> one copyrighted copy of Gilbertson's
>> OPENING BRIEF, and then talk it up
>> in your immediate circle of neighbors,
>> friends, and associates.
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>>
>>
>> At 01:36 PM 7/29/97 -0700, you wrote:
>> >Patrick Arnold paarnold@wizards.net 14:00 hrs Pacific 7-29-97 Thanks for
>> >data. What can I do? I am the guy trying to get six people to hold up
>> >"indict Hillary" signs next Sunday afternoon in Des Moines section of
>> >seattle for half an hour. If nothing ealse, such a gathering would be a
>> >place to network and I can mention your message. Open to further messages
>> >from you Thanks.
>> >
>> >On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dear Clients, Friends, and Media:
>> >>
>> >> Please forgive us if this is a repeat posting.
>> >>
>> >> Whether or not Everett C. Gilbertson can afford
>> >> to pay for the legal work that would be required
>> >> to rebut DOJ'S REPLY BRIEF in his appeal to the
>> >> 8th Circuit, there are numerous fatal errors
>> >> which this REPLY BRIEF has made.
>> >>
>> >> I hereby volunteer to do as much as I can
>> >> to demonstrate these errors, in addition to
>> >> other serious errors which have been made
>> >> in this extremely weak, legally incorrect,
>> >> and embarrassingly short REPLY BRIEF.
>> >>
>> >> Here goes:
>> >>
>> >> We now have definitive proof that U.S. Attorneys
>> >> are not reading pleadings which defendants are
>> >> filing in criminal tax cases. The following
>> >> documents the written proof, for the record:
>> >>
>> >> In DOJ's REPLY BRIEF in U.S.A. v. Gilbertson,
>> >> Messrs. David L. Lillehaug and Henry J. Shea
>> >> of the U.S. Attorneys office in Minneapolis,
>> >> Minnesota, claim that Gilbertson has raised
>> >> "void for vagueness" for the first time on
>> >> appeal. They were "assisted" by Ms. Amy Larson,
>> >> Law Clerk. Quoting now:
>> >>
>> >> "Defendant's final argument contends that the
>> >> Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is unconstitutionally
>> >> vague. 4/" [REPLY BRIEF, page 9]
>> >>
>> >> Footnote 4 reads:
>> >>
>> >> "Although defendant earlier challenged the authority
>> >> of the United States government to collect income
>> >> taxes from him, he appears to have raised this
>> >> particular issue for the first time on appeal.
>> >> Issues raised for the first time on appeal are
>> >> generally waived."
>> >>
>> >> Gilbertson and his Counsel know full well that
>> >> issues raised for the first time on appeal are
>> >> generally waived.
>> >>
>> >> However ...
>> >>
>> >> ... this is very sad, but very conclusive evidence,
>> >> that these U.S. Attorneys DID NOT READ Gilbertson's
>> >> pleadings. On three (3) separate occasions during
>> >> the pre- and post-trial proceedings, Gilbertson
>> >> moved the USDC for an indefinite stay of proceedings,
>> >> pending final resolution of his challenge to the
>> >> constitutionality of the Jury Selection and Service Act.
>> >>
>> >> In the sworn statement which MUST accompany
>> >> such a STAY MOTION, pursuant to the JSSA itself,
>> >> Gilbertson submitted the following:
>> >>
>> >> "The case of U.S. v. Cruikshank is famous, not
>> >> only for confirming this distinction between
>> >> State Citizens and U.S. citizens, but also for
>> >> establishing a key precedent in the area of due
>> >> process. This precedent underlies the 'void for
>> >> vagueness' doctrine which can and should be
>> >> applied to nullify the IRC."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Again, this particular paragraph was repeated
>> >> on three (3) different occasions to the
>> >> United States District Court ("USDC"), and to all
>> >> interested parties, including of course the
>> >> office of the United States Attorneys in
>> >> Minneapolis, Minesota state, the Attorney General
>> >> and the Solicitor General in Washington, D.C.
>> >>
>> >> You would think that three times would be
>> >> enough. We now wonder if DOJ in D.C. even
>> >> bothered to read the pleadings either.
>> >>
>> >> Evidently, these U.S. Attorneys were not aware
>> >> that this sworn statement was, quite simply, a
>> >> verified excerpt from Chapter 11 of the
>> >> book entitled "The Federal Zone: Cracking the
>> >> Code of Internal Revenue." It is fair to
>> >> say that the author of this book nearly spent
>> >> as much time on this chapter, as ALL the other
>> >> chapters combined; it is grammatically,
>> >> legally, and historically as precise, and
>> >> nearly perfect, as anything ever written on the
>> >> subject of sovereignty, as that term is
>> >> pertinent to decoding the Internal Revenue
>> >> Code. See definition of "United States" in
>> >> Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, for
>> >> more proof.
>> >>
>> >> Given this, it is nothing less than a crass and
>> >> gross insult to the American People that these U.S.
>> >> Attorneys [sic] would not even read it.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps, they are just too busy lining their
>> >> pockets with kick-backs from the IRS,
>> >> facilitating more bribes to line the pockets
>> >> of federal judges, and forcing Citizens to line up
>> >> for mug shots and bread lines at federal prison
>> >> camps around the nation.
>> >>
>> >> I am truly appalled.
>> >>
>> >> Messrs. Lillihaug and Shea, you have now
>> >> made these fatal mistakes with the wrong man.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> >> http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>> B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>>
>> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
>> website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>>
>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>> ========================================================================
>> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail