Time: Sat Aug 09 10:57:55 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15370; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 10:41:20 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 13:40:39 -0400 Originator: heritage-l@gate.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] To: pmitch@primenet.com Subject: Re: SLS:14th Amendment CEASE AND DESIST >Fine piece of legal jargon, however, would you kindly explain in layman's >terms in order that we simple country folk are able to understand what it >is that you are saying? Here goes (in language which is as simple as I can make it, after a very difficult and trying day): the 14th amendment was never ratified, as proven by solid historical facts recited by the Utah Supreme Court in the case of Dyett v. Turner (1968) section 4 says the validity of the public shall not be questioned since #14 never made it into the constitution, this section is not Law -- no way more importantly, the attempt to rope everyone into federal citizenship also failed with this failed amendment there are now two classes of citizenship, and you have a basic Right to choose one, the other, both, or neither; this is called the Right of Election in the law books citizenship is a term which is tied to the land, and we have two classes of land in America: the state zone, and the federal zone, corresponding to the state and federal governments if you choose federal citizenship, you agree to be taxed like all other federal citizens, because you associate yourself with a political body which is not protected by the constitution if you choose state Citizenship, you make yourself a sovereign without subjects, and you cannot be taxed like federal citizens, because Congress must "apportion" direct taxes inside the 50 states, under 2 restrictions in the constitution if Congress were to "apportion" a direct tax, then California would pay 10% of that tax, if California has 10% of the nation's population there are no apportionment provisions in the current Internal Revenue Code, anywhere for this reason, the tax being collected by the IRS is unlawful, as it is currently imposed on Citizens of the 50 states moreover, voter registration affidavits are a fraud in all 50 states, because you cannot vote unless you declare, under penalty of perjury, that you are a federal citizen jury candidates must also be federal citizens, and this requirement in state laws causes all grand and trial juries to be illegal bodies the federal jury selection Act is likewise unconstitutional, for requiring that all jury candidates be federal citizens too, or they cannot serve on any juries, state or federal a major constitutional crisis is now underway, in large part because of these momentous findings I hope this helps! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com p.s. Please help yourself to all the documents in the Supreme Law Library at the URL just below my name here. See, in particular, "Congresswoman Suspected of Income Tax Evasion," and "Juries in Check around the Nation". At 08:19 PM 8/8/97 -0700, you wrote: >Fine piece of legal jargon, however, would you kindly explain in layman's >terms in order that we simple country folk are able to understand what it >is that you are saying? > >Many thanks, >brjamj860@worldnet.att.net > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail