Time: Mon Aug 11 10:18:04 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22826;
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:11:21 -0700 (MST)
by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA08957;
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:06:24 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:05:17 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: "All Acts of Congress are Territorial"
25. Respondent hereby denies ever having elected to reside
within any fictional "State within a state" created by the Buck
Act, see 4 U.S.C. 104-113, Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville,
344 U.S. 624 (1953), Schwartz v. O'Hara TP. School Dist., 100
A.2d 621, 625 (1953). There are no regulations in the CFR
imposing these statutes, see CFR Index and Finding Aids, 1/1/93,
p. 937, "Referrals to Department of Justice or GAO". Respondent
has never been a federal employee and denies being subject in any
way to the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939. All acts of Congress <--!!!
are territorial in nature and apply only within its territorial <--!!!
jurisdiction, see American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 213 <--!!!
U.S. 347, 356-357 (1909); U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217, 222 <--!!!
(1949); New York Central R.R. Co. v. Chisholm, 268 U.S. 29, <--!!!
31-32, (1925); and Sandberg v. McDonald, 248 U.S. 185 (1918). <--!!!
Respondent has gone to great lengths to revoke all elections
which, in his belief, might appear to create a loss of rights or
a grant of jurisdiction to the Petitioners, or to any of their
agencies, assigns, or instrumentalities, see IRC 871.
>Also, I cannot find the cite that "All Acts of Congress are Territorial".Do
>you happen to know it?
Attachment Converted: "I:\ATTACH\OPPOSOSC.doc"
Attachment Converted: "I:\ATTACH\OPPOSOSC.ASC"
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]From ???@??? Mon Aug 11 11:45:41 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11817;
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 11:37:18 -0700 (MST)
by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA29550;
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 11:33:41 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 11:31:24 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL
>>>>>FEDS INVADE LOCAL FARM
>>>>>From: Jackie Madison <m9776@erols.com>
>>>>>
>>> [Comment To: gburns@primenet.com (Dr. Eugene A. Burns) <---!!!
>>> from Devvy Kidd (powerkid@ix.netcom.com) Dr. Burns:
>>> This will increase until The People of this country
>>> stand up and say NO MORE and throw out the people
>>> who make the laws and statutes that allow this type of
>>> Nazi action. My battle cry: Recall them. Devvy 8.3.97]
[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
c/o General Delivery at:
2509 North Campbell Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state
In Propria Persona
Under Protest and Without Prejudice
By Special Visitation Only
PIMA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED JUSTICE COURT
Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) Case Number #CV-97-3438
Plaintiff, )
) PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED
v. ) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
)
Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock, ) Rule 201(d),
Defendants. ) Arizona Rules of Evidence;
) 28 U.S.C. 1746(1);
) Supremacy Clause;
) International Covenant on
) Civil and Political Rights;
) Universal Declaration of
) Human Rights, enacted with
___________________________) explicit Reservations
COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Citizen of Arizona
state, expressly not a citizen of the United States ("federal
citizen") and Plaintiff in the above entitled matter (hereinafter
"Plaintiff"), to provide formal Notice to all interested parties,
and to demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court,
pursuant to Rule 201(d) of the Arizona Rules of Evidence, of
this, PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, charging the
following named individuals, jointly and severally, with the
corresponding crimes enumerated infra.
Plaintiff hereby formally charges:
[Please see next page et seq.]
Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint: Page 1 of 6
Mr. Neil T. Nordbrock with:
fraud on a pure Trust for creating a fictitious Trustee
mail fraud and bank fraud for maintaining fictitious Trustee
fraud on Plaintiff for false non-disclosure agreement
fraud on Plaintiff for false appointment to office of VP
retaliating against a federal witness in Plaintiff
deprivation of Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
theft of Plaintiff's professional services for a pure Trust
Mrs. Evelyn R. Nordbrock with:
aiding and abetting fraud on Trust for fictitious Trustee
aiding and abetting mail fraud and bank fraud for same
aiding and abetting retaliation against a federal witness
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
aiding and abetting theft of professional services
Mr. Lawrence E. Condit with:
aiding and abetting embezzlement of funds
aiding and abetting conversion of private property
aiding and abetting libel against Plaintiff with injury
aiding and abetting deprivation of due process of law
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
Dr. Eugene A. Burns with:
fraud on a pure Trust for creating a fictitious Trustee
mail fraud and bank fraud for maintaining fictitious Trustee
fraud on Plaintiff for false non-disclosure agreement
fraud on Plaintiff for false appointment to office of VP
perjury before U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
contempt of U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
retaliation against a federal witness
libel against Plaintiff with intent to injure
deprivation of Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
Mrs. Linda H. Burns with:
perjury on false proof of service form to U.S.D.C., Arizona
aiding and abetting fraud on Trust for fictitious Trustee
aiding and abetting mail fraud and bank fraud for same
aiding and abetting fraud for false non-disclosure agreement
aiding and abetting fraud for false appointment to VP office
aiding and abetting perjury before U.S.D.C., Arizona
aiding and abetting contempt of U.S.D.C., Arizona
aiding and abetting retaliation against a federal witness
aiding and abetting deprivation of Plaintiff's privacy Right
aiding and abetting libel against Plaintiff with injury
deprivation of Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint: Page 2 of 6
Mr. Richard Rineer with:
fraud on a pure Trust for creating a fictitious Trustee
mail fraud and bank fraud for maintaining fictitious Trustee
aiding and abetting theft of professional services
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
Mr. Tim Hay with:
aiding and abetting perjury upon U.S.D.C., Arizona
aiding and abetting contempt of U.S.D.C., Arizona
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
aiding and abetting theft of professional services
Mrs. Susan Shew with:
wire fraud upon Plaintiff for faxing false work order
mail fraud and bank fraud for maintaining fictitious Trustee
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
aiding and abetting theft of professional services
Mr. Patrick Shew with:
aiding and abetting wire fraud
Mr. Herbert Crawford with:
threatening a federal witness
grand theft of Plaintiff's private property
deprivation of Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
obstruction of justice in federal and state proceedings
racketeering to convert real property across state lines
Mrs. Louise Crawford with:
aiding and abetting grand theft
racketeering to convert real property across state lines
Mr. David Wallen with:
aiding and abetting grand theft of Plaintiff's property
obstruction of justice in federal and state proceedings
racketeering to convert real property across state lines
Ms. Sheila T. Wallen with:
theft of Plaintiff's professional services
defamation of Plaintiff with intent to injure
conspiracy to defame Plaintiff with intent to injure
Mr. W. U. Weber with:
impersonating a judicial officer
deprivation of Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff's fundamental Rights
aiding and abetting obstruction of justice
aiding and abetting embezzlement of private property
aiding and abetting conversion of private property
aiding and abetting libel against Plaintiff
Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint: Page 3 of 6
VERIFICATION
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Citizen of Arizona
state, federal witness, and Plaintiff in the instant case, hereby
verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United
States of America, without (outside) the "United States" (federal
government), that the above statement of facts is true and
correct, to the best of My current information, knowledge, and
belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: June 21, 1997
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint: Page 4 of 6
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty
of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America,
without the "United States," that I am at least 18 years of age,
a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and that I
personally served the following document(s):
PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
Rule 201(d), Arizona Rules of Evidence;
28 U.S.C. 1746(1); Supremacy Clause;
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;
Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
enacted with explicit Reservations
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first
class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly
addressed to the following:
Mr. and Mrs. Neil T. Nordbrock
c/o 6642 E. Calle de San Alberto
Tucson, Arizona state
Mr. Lawrence E. Condit
c/o 376 South Stone Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state
Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns
c/o 4500 E. Speedway, #27
Tucson, Arizona state
Mr. Richard Rineer
c/o 4841 E. Speedway Boulevard
Tucson, Arizona state
Mr. Tim Hay
c/o 4500 E. Speedway Boulevard, #27
Tucson, Arizona state
Mrs. Susan Shew
c/o 4500 E. Speedway Boulevard, #27
Tucson, Arizona state
Mr. and Mrs. Patrick Shew
c/o 2624 W. Flamebrook
Tucson, Arizona state
Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Crawford
c/o 4741 W. Camino Tierra
Tucson, Arizona state
Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint: Page 5 of 6
Mr. David Wallen
c/o 2536 Vereda de la Manana
Tucson, Arizona state
Ms. Sheila T. Wallen
c/o 2536 Vereda de la Manana
Tucson, Arizona state
Mr. W. U. Weber
c/o 115 N. Church Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state
Chief of Police
Tucson Police Department
270 S. Stone Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state
Executed on June 21, 1997:
/s/ Paul Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint: Page 6 of 6
# # #
NOTICE AND DEMAND TO
CEASE AND DESIST
TO: Neil Thomas Nordbrock
c/o 6642 E. Calle de San Alberto
Tucson 85710/tdc
ARIZONA STATE
FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law
DATE: August 8, 1997
SUBJECT: Your Misconduct at the Post Office
Dear Mr. Nordbrock:
I would not normally need to write this NOTICE AND DEMAND TO
CEASE AND DESIST, if the intended recipient had carefully
considered how foolish it would be to harass and insult a well
known federal witness, in the lobby of a United States Post
Office today.
However, this is the third time in as many months that you and
your accessory, Dr. Eugene A. Burns, have chosen to point your
unwanted behavior in my direction.
You may recall that day when I had left my apartment on foot, and
I was walking on the Second Street sidewalk towards Swan, to do
some business at the postal substation in the hardware store.
Your drove out of the parking lot, at the southeast end of the
Midway Business Park, and proceeded eastward on the same street.
Upon encountering me, you blew your horn at me, without any
warning or greeting, as you approached me from my rear. You may
have noticed that I was somewhat startled by this action of
yours, coming as it was from a vehicle approaching me from the
back.
Then, of course, there was the incident when I found Dr. Burns
casing the carport area on the west side of the apartment
building where I live. When he saw me, he quickly drove away in
his old brown Ford pickup truck. I hope by now you have reviewed
the Internet message which I wrote to commemorate that event.
The message I wrote, to refresh your memory, recounted the 911
call which I placed, and the professional visit which I enjoyed
with Officer Kingman of the Tucson Police Department. Officer
Kingman advised me to obtain a protective ORDER from a local
state court. I do intend to do so, when other important
priorities are not so pressing.
Now, today, I was walking into the Coronado Station of the U.S.
Postal Service, where I was totally surprised to encounter you.
There, you began to insult me, calling me "Asshole" and "Jerk"
loud enough for several other people to hear you. I did my best
to keep my distance from you, so it was entirely likely that
others heard these deliberate insults coming from you.
Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist: Page 1 of 5
At that moment, I had to make a very important decision, and this
is what I decided to do: I went to one of the work tables inside
the post office, and I proceeded to write an urgent message to
Mary, a friendly and efficient counter clerk who helps me almost
every other day at the Coronado Station. Although she was busy
with another customer, I placed the message on her counter and
quietly told her that it was urgent. The message very simply
told her to summon the Postmaster, because a man had verbally
insulted me in the lobby, the same man who had already embezzled
$3,000 from me.
I then positioned myself right beneath the closed-circuit
television camera which is running at all times in that post
office, where I watched Mary, and waited for her to go for help
and return with the security officers I had requested. This plan
worked exactly as I had hoped, and Mike returned with Mary, who
pointed me out to Mike. Mike then came to the door which is
right below that television camera, and invited into the safety
of the private office behind that door. There, I told him that I
needed a security officer to escort me to my car. Mike asked if
I had any business in the post office that day. I told him that
I did, but that it could wait. He recommended that I wait for
you to leave, and then finish my business. I took this excellent
advice, and was very glad that I did.
At that precise moment in time, you were being assisted by Rick
at Rick's regular counter, the one at the far left of the post
office counter area. Rick knows me as a regular customer, and he
is quite familiar with the quantity and nature of the legal mail
which I post at Coronado Station. Mike and I entered this
private office, where Mike offered me a place to sit and feel
safe. Before sitting down in that office, I observed you on the
closed-circuit television monitor, which time- and date-stamps
every video frame. I specifically remember that the time was
exactly 3:37 p.m. today.
After you were done at Rick's counter, Mike returned to the
private office, informed me that you were gone, and permitted me
to leave that private office. I then waited in the counter lobby
for my new ticket number to come up, because the first one was
long since past. During this period of time, you evidently
decided to get in your car and drive away. When my turn came up,
I went to Rick's counter, and told him that Mike had instructed
me to request the next counter clerk to summon Mike again, as
soon as I was ready for an escort to my car. Mike very promptly
appeared and did escort me right up to my car, where I thanked
him and shook his hand. He responded by assuring me that I could
call upon him at any time, should this kind of thing happen again
at any time in the future.
Neil, you may recall that I petitioned the Justice Court for an
ORDER requiring you to attend involuntary alcohol rehabilitation.
That petition was denied, for reasons which were never explained
to me. To this day, I must assume that you have refused to seek
any help with your alcohol problem.
Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist: Page 2 of 5
Your threatening behavior today was, very sadly, further evidence
still of your inability to exercise consistently good judgments,
in situations where your personal liabilities are likely to be
significant. You are, evidently, ignorant or unaware that the
post office lobby at Coronado Station is continuously monitored
by closed-circuit television cameras, in addition to being quite
expertly patrolled by a very capable, and very invisible force of
full-time security officers. The main reason why you may have
never noticed this security presence, is precisely because they
are so expert at making themselves unobtrusive and almost
entirely invisible. They are armed, and they are very good.
It is truly beyond me why you would choose the lobby of such a
secure government building, to verbalize obscene insults which
were obviously directed at me, because you used my first name
when you did so. The counter clerks at Coronado Station see me
almost every day, and they all know me very well by my first
name. So, if you were thinking, even if only for a moment, that
nobody was noticing, you were also sadly mistaken by another
unfortunate example of self-imposed delusion.
I must, therefore, demand that you cease and desist such
unethical behavior, which borders on criminal insanity. When I
was doing legal research for you, at your own request, I went way
out of my way to provide you with the documentation necessary to
explain the meaning, and legislative history, of the federal
witness statutes. These statutes are 18 U.S.C. 1512 and 1513.
Lest you should think that I was doing this only for you, I now
remind you that I was rendered a federal witness the moment I
filed a verified affidavit in federal district court, in a case
which involved the New Life Health Center, for which you have
been the accountant for many years (according to bankruptcy
records I have examined). You also attended the third of those
several court hearings with me, and you sat at the defendant's
table, on the right side of John M. Roll's courtroom.
You may remember, it was at that particular hearing when Judge
Roll complained of having some 14 inches of pleadings to read in
that case, but then he later modified this by stating that there
were only 6 or 7 inches, not 14. This was an open admission by
Judge Roll, which you and I both witnessed, of his criminal
liability for numerous federal offenses, including obstruction of
correspondence, jury tampering, obstruction of justice, and
conspiracy to commit all of the above.
At last count, there were 112 such offenses committed by John M.
Roll, and another 112 such offenses committed by Assistant U.S.
Attorney Robert L. Miskell, not to mention the small host of
accessories and co-conspirators who have aided and abetted this
criminal conspiracy in the United States District Court in
Tucson, Arizona state.
So, Neil, if you should persist in escalating your harassment and
retaliation of someone who tried to help you, in every way that I
could, only to be embezzled by you to the tune of $3,000, you are
sadly, if not tragically, wrong to think that I will not take
Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist: Page 3 of 5
steps to minimize the damages you continue to cause me. You have
also stolen a database of mine, conservatively valued at more
than $350,000, at current rates for research paralegals.
Please be advised, once and for all, that I have retained the
services of a private security and investigations firm, who are
well armed and entirely qualified to execute a Citizen's arrest
upon probable cause. What you did today at the post office was,
without a doubt, probable cause to arrest you, for persisting in
perpetrating criminal retaliation against someone whom you
already know very well to be a qualified federal witness.
This kind of conduct could very well result in sentencing you to
a decade or more of incarceration in federal prison, and imposing
a very large fine upon your estate, to punish you for your
pattern of criminal retaliation against me, for verified
testimony which I have now placed in several federal and state
courts. This testimony, as you already know quite well,
implicates you in numerous premeditated federal offenses, which
have been itemized in detail in the verified criminal complaint
which I have filed in the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court,
with copies to two federal bankruptcy courts.
When you invited me to move to Tucson, and when I consented to go
way out of my way to do so, you must have been proceeding with
some crazy attempt to "try" your fraudulent trust scheme on me,
to see if it was good enough to fool a recognized expert in
federal law. This attempt on your part has been a terrible and
tragic failure, Neil, if what I believe now is correct.
Why do you now persist in aggravating your already precarious
situation, with the kind of stupid and criminal conduct which you
displayed today at the post office?
Don't you have any idea how much trouble you have already created
for yourself, your spouse, and possibly also your entire family?
I have a moral obligation, at this point in time, to tell you
that I can no longer help in any way to minimize the negative
consequences of this trouble, because the wheels of justice are
now grinding out their inevitable solution in your case, and in
other related cases.
Dr. Burns has valued his precious South American Macaw birds at a
total market value of $250, this after he bragged to me on
several occasions that the blue Hyacinth, named Magoo, did cost
him more than $5,000, for one bird! Have you been advising him
all along how to organize his fraudulent financial statements?
You should know by now that accountants cannot invoke the kind of
client privilege which is available to legal counsels.
I am taking the liberty of forwarding copies of this NOTICE AND
DEMAND to several people in the Tucson community, with the final
hope that others will be more persuasive with you. Neil, if you
don't get help with your alcohol problem, you will have no way to
defend yourself against the criminal charges which are sure to
come your way, sooner or later, in a civil case or in response to
a criminal indictment and arraignment.
Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist: Page 4 of 5
Please come to your senses immediately. You will be the better
man for it.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson 85719/tdc
ARIZONA STATE (See USPS Publication #221.)
email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.3(16):
preferred, to conserve all resources)
phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line:
please get permission to disclose)
fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy:
available 24-hours per day or night)
fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (switched fax/modem:
use when fax machine is busy/no answer)
website: http://www.supremelaw.com
copy: Postmaster, Coronado Station
Mike, Manager, Coronado Station
James A. Crawford, Postal Inspector, Tucson
Lawrence E. Condit, Tucson, Arizona
Clerk of Court, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix
Clerk of Court, Superior Court of Arizona, Tucson
Clerk of Court, Pima County Consolidated Justice Court
County Attorney, Pima County, criminal division
Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Todd V. Jones, Tucson, Arizona
Chief of Police, Tucson Police Department
Officer Kingman, Tucson Police, Midtown Substation
Deputy Sheriff, Pima County Sheriff's Department
Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist: Page 5 of 5
# # #
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail