Time: Wed Aug 20 21:34:47 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA07453; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 21:22:32 -0700 (MST) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA27352; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 21:18:19 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 21:16:53 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLF: Dispute erupts over "ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic] <snip> > >Subject: Dispute erupts over "ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic] > >[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > > > c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 > Tucson [zip code exempt] > ARIZONA REPUBLIC > > August 10, 1997 > >Mr. John Oppedahl >Publisher and CEO >"The Arizona Republic" >c/o P.O. Box 1950 >Phoenix 85001/tdc >ARIZONA REPUBLIC > >Subject: Letter from Frank G. Long, dated August 8, 1997 > >Dear Mr. Oppedahl: > >I have received, but not accepted, a letter from Mr. Frank G. >Long, claiming that Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. ("PNI") has >instructed him to take legal action against Me, to obtain a court >order to stop what he alleges to be "unauthorized and infringing >use of ARIZONA REPUBLIC". With that letter, he also enclosed a >copy of a document which he described as "a copy of complaint >that will be filed in U.S. District Court of Arizona and served" >upon Me, unless I deliver to his office by 12:00 noon, Friday, >August 15, 1997, a letter advising PNI that I will: > > (1) immediately cease using ARIZONA REPUBLIC on > correspondence or on the Internet in connection with > any publications or related services; > > (2) refrain from using ARIZONA REPUBLIC in that manner in > the future; > > (3) sign an agreement confirming My acceptance of these > demands. > >Mr. Oppedahl, I have very good reasons to believe that Mr. Long >is either entirely ignorant of many important material facts, or >he has deliberately chosen to withhold many important material >facts from you, which you need to know immediately. In an effort >to persuade you to reconsider the action which Mr. Long has >threatened in writing to take, I offer the following for your >careful consideration, review, and verification: > > >1. Mr. Long refers in his letter to correspondence which I have > been sending to the Pima County Attorney's office. > >It is true that I have been sending first class U.S. Mail to the >Pima County Attorney's office. However, this mail is of a very >confidential and sensitive nature, because it concerns several >cases which are currently underway in state and federal courts, >here in Tucson and also in Phoenix. I can only speculate at this >point in time, how it was that Mr. Long obtained access to this >correspondence and its contents. You need to ask him yourself, >how it was that he did so. If and when you obtain an answer from >him, would you please do Me the courtesy of relating his answer >to Me? I would very much appreciate that. > > > Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 1 of 7 > > >For your information, I have requested the Pima County Jury >Commissioner to provide Me with an opportunity to testify to the >currently convened grand jury in Pima County, concerning the >material evidence I now have of probable cause for charging >several government employees and private individuals in Arizona >with numerous violations of federal and state criminal codes. >These cases, which have thoroughly documented the material >evidence to which I refer, are the following: > > > In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center > Company, United States District Court, Tucson, case number > #GJ-95-1-6 > > Mitchell v. Nordbrock, Pima County Consolidated Justice > Court, Tucson, case number #CV-97-3438 > > People ex rel. Mitchell v. Pima County Consolidated Justice > Court, Superior Court of Arizona State, Tucson, case number > #320831 > > Swan Business Organization v. Ulan et al., Superior Court of > the State of Arizona, Tucson, case number #315580 > > In Re Eugene A. and Linda H. Burns, United States Bankruptcy > Court, Tucson, case number #96-01624-TUC-LO > > In Re New Life Health Center Company, United States > Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix, case number #93-06051-PHX-GBN > > In Re J. Fife Symington III, United States Bankruptcy Court, > Phoenix, case number #95-08397-PHX-GBN > > U.S.A. v. Wallen, United States District Court, Tucson, case > number #95-484-WDB > > >I have listed the above cases in part because you have ready >access to the docket files here in Arizona (Tucson and Phoenix). >There are a number of additional cases which I could cite here, >but their files are all in the custody of court clerks who are >located in other states of the Union. Notably, the grand jury >civil case #GJ-95-1-6 and the Wallen criminal case #95-484-WDB, >have resulted in formal Complaints of Judicial Misconduct being >filed with the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San >Francisco, California. I would fully expect that the latter >Clerk will give you access to the docket files for those two >Judicial Misconduct Complaints, upon proper request for same. > >Now, with these specific cases as a factual and legal foundation >for what I am about to tell you, I am extremely alarmed that Mr. >Long has admitted, in writing which he transmitted to Me via >Certified United States Mail, that he is already aware of >correspondence which I have been sending to the Pima County >Attorney's Office. For your information, I have had direct >written contact with Mr. David R. White, Chief Criminal Deputy, >and Ms. Carolyn Emerine, Program Director. Because she is the >head of that entire government unit, I would fully expect that >Ms. Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney, is also aware of the > > > Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 2 of 7 > > >several written materials which I have already forwarded to Mr. >White and to Ms. Emerine. Please contact the latter individuals >on your own, as soon as possible, to confirm what I am telling >you here. But, please read the rest of this letter first, okay? > >Without knowing any more about Mr. Long's method(s) of obtaining >access to the information which I have supplied to the Pima >County Attorney's office, I would have to say that his letter >contains enough incriminating admissions to constitute sufficient >and probable cause for Me to charge him with aiding and abetting >a serious criminal conspiracy. It is evident to Me that the Pima >County Attorney's office is taking affirmative steps to delay >and/or prevent certain essential investigations from proceeding >into the material evidence which I have assembled and cited >above. The criminal violations to which I have been an >eyewitness, and the evidence of which I have already verified >under penalty of perjury, constitute proof of the following >criminal activities: > > > (1) deprivations of fundamental Rights, under color of law, > including, but not limited to systematic violations of > voting Rights, and jury selection policies; > > (2) conspiracy to deprive the fundamental Rights of > Citizens of Arizona; > > (3) obstruction of correspondence transmitted through > United States Mail to a federal grand jury; > > (4) perjury before a United States District Court and > before a federal grand jury; > > (5) tampering with a federal grand jury; > > (6) obstruction of justice in proceedings before a United > States District Court and before a federal grand jury; > > (7) conspiracy to commit obstruction of correspondence, > jury tampering, obstruction of justice, perjury, > barratry, extortion, and mail fraud; > > (8) placing false and misrepresentative statements in > pleadings filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court; > > (9) threatening a known federal witness, and retaliating > against a known federal witness; > > (10) racketeering and child kidnapping across state lines, > and conspiracy to commit both across state lines; > > (11) fraud, bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud on an > Arizona pure trust, and upon the officers of an Arizona > pure trust; > > (12) theft of professional services, wrongful termination, > contempt of court, libel, defamation, grand theft, and > aiding and abetting one or more of the above. > > > Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 3 of 7 > > >In support of evidence establishing probable cause for charging >certain individuals, both in and out of government, with the >criminal activities itemized above, I have enclosed, for your >careful review and study, several documents which have already >been filed in the cases cited above. I encourage you to confirm >that these documents have, in fact, been filed, served, and >docketed in their respective cases. > > >2. In his letter, Mr. Long refers to a complaint that will be > filed in U.S. District Court in Arizona, unless I yield to > his demands [sic]. > >The so-called COMPLAINT [sic] Mr. Long enclosed with his letter, >in and of itself constitutes further probable cause for Me to >believe that Mr. Long may already be conspiring with the very >same individuals who are active suspects in one or more of the >criminal activities itemized above. I refer specifically to >Richard H. Weare, Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Arizona. >Please note the active role which Mr. Weare has, evidently, taken >in the conspiracy: to obstruct correspondence, to tamper with a >federal grand jury, and to obstruct justice in proceedings before >the U.S. District Court in Tucson last year, in #GJ-95-1-6. See >the enclosed letter to the FBI in Tucson, in particular. > >To My knowledge, this conspiracy continues right up to the >present time; I know this, because the Chief Judge of the Ninth >Circuit has failed to act on either of the Complaints of Judicial >Misconduct which I have filed against two (2) federal judges in >Tucson. Mr. Long's draft COMPLAINT is first described by Mr. >Long as a complaint that will be filed [sic], but that very >COMPLAINT already bears civil case number #[redacted]. > >In other words, it has already been filed in the office of Mr. >Richard H. Weare, and a federal judge has already been assigned. >Therefore, that proceeding has already commenced, but Mr. Long >misleads Me into thinking that he has not yet filed it, and that >it has not yet commenced. What is the truth here, Mr. Oppedahl? >This misrepresentation is probable cause to charge Mr. Long with >transmitting fraudulent and/or deliberately misleading statements >via United States Mail; this is also a federal offense. > >There are a number of other misleading and misrepresentative >statements which Mr. Long has already written in his so-called >COMPLAINT. If you do not already have a copy of this so-called >COMPLAINT, I do encourage you to get a true and correct version >of the one which must already have been filed in the office of >Mr. Richard H. Weare, in order for it to bear a valid and >currently active case number. > >I do feel that it is My moral obligation to inform you that Mr. >Long is proceeding on the basis of certain assumptions, and >presumptions, that are demonstrably false and which completely >eclipse any integrity his allegations might otherwise have had. >In particular, if he is deluding himself into believing that I am >"profiting" from My activism as a writer, investigator, Counselor >at Law, and federal witness, he is tragically and demonstrably >mistaken. I will now summarize the real losses I have sustained. > > > Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 4 of 7 > > >When I worked for Elizabeth Broderick on her civil and criminal >cases in Los Angeles, she stiffed Me for over $10,000 in legal >services, and loaned Me a car with tampered front brakes. > >When I worked for LeRoy Schweitzer and his nineteen (19) other >co-defendants in Billings, Montana, he and his associates there >stiffed Me for over $10,000 in legal services, and then proceeded >to delay and tamper with numerous pieces of legal mail which were >directed to Me, care of their post office box. > >When I worked for Sheila Wallen in her criminal case in Tucson, >she stiffed Me for over $3,000 in legal services; her brother >David Wallen aided and abetted Herb Crawford in an act of grand >theft against My private property. > >When I worked for the New Life Health Center ("New Life") in >Tucson, the General Manager stiffed Me for over $2,000 in legal >services, and damaged Me in a host of other ways which are >already well documented, and which remain undenied. > >When Herb Crawford vacated My apartment very suddenly, because I >demanded that he do so, he took with him over $1,200 worth of >cash and office equipment, this after threatening Me twelve (12) >times when he already knew very well that I am a federal witness. > >After Crawford threatened My life, and this after I provided him >with shelter which he told Me he needed desperately, I did not >think it was wise to keep any money around My house. I entrusted >the New Life accountant with $3,000 of My own money, and that >accountant, Mr. Neil T. Nordbrock, then proceeded to embezzle >every last penny of this money, leaving Me destitute and without >essential medical services. Do you have an adding machine? > >Mr. Oppedahl, if you do know the secret of squeezing blood from a >turnip, would you please let Me in on this valuable secret? > > >3. In his so-called COMPLAINT, Mr. Long expresses his desire to > persuade a federal court to order an accounting by Me of all > "profits derived from the providing of services through the > unauthorized use of ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic]. > >Mr. Oppedahl, this statement by Mr. Long makes it very clear to >Me that he, and his unnamed accessories, have much more in mind >than some trivial changes in the way I have chosen to label >envelopes which I transmit through the mail. This statement >expresses his intention to bring down upon Me the criminal force >and undue influence of the very same conspiracy which I have >already identified and documented within the United States >District Court, here in Tucson, in Phoenix, and in other cities >across this nation. Do you want to be the one who was >responsible for authorizing such conduct by Mr. Long? Would you >please do Me the courtesy of an honest answer to this question? > >If you are still a bit confused by any of the points which I have >already made in this letter, please find a way to locate and read >the essay entitled "Karma and the Federal Courts" in the Supreme > > > Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 5 of 7 > > >Law Library at http://www.supremelaw.com. The United States >District Court ("USDC") is a territorial court, identical to the >"territorial courts of the United States" which are mentioned in >15 U.S.C. 1121 -- one of the statues cited by Mr. Long in his >so-called COMPLAINT; this is the court he intends to petition. > >Arizona is not a territory; it is a Union state, a REPUBLIC, a >star on the flag, under the Guarantee Clause. If the attorney >whom your corporation has hired does not yet understand this all- >important distinction, then you and your corporation may be in >very deep trouble, much deeper trouble than you ever imagined >possible. I am saying this with all honesty, and with great and >sincere earnest, because the conspiracy which I have identified >needs to be contained, not enlarged. I am not referring here to >some grand or vague international oligarchy; I am referring to >the statutory definition of "conspiracy" which Congress has >legislated at 18 U.S.C. 241. Even if you did not know anything >about it before now, your willingness to aid and abet this >criminal racket would still make you and your corporation liable >as accessories after the fact; all the more so, do you now run >the very serious and real risk of criminal complicity, because of >the many statements of material fact which I am sharing with you >here, all of which can, and should, be independently verified by >you before authorizing Mr. Long to proceed as planned. > >In conclusion, Mr. Oppedahl, please carefully and deliberately >reconsider the actions which Mr. Long is threatening to take >against Me, as described in his recent letter and in the >accompanying COMPLAINT which he has not only drafted, but also >filed in the USDC in Phoenix, Arizona. I should think that, >after reading and verifying all of the statements which I have >carefully prepared for your confidential review here, you would >at least give Me the benefits of the doubt and of a private >hearing in your office, hopefully in front of witnesses (veteran >reporters perhaps?) and with a good tape recorder going, to >commemorate My verbal confirmations to you, in Person. > >I do honestly think that Mr. Long is proposing a course of action >which could very well result in serious damages to your good name >and reputation, and to the good name and reputation of your >excellent newspaper, that are far beyond anything which you can >presently anticipate with any degree of accuracy. I say this, >because of the mountains of litigation in which I have already >been involved since I began this work in 1990. The cases which I >have cited for you above, are only a sample of the overall story >which I have already documented, to the very best of My mental >and physical abilities. The fact that I am still alive today >should be an indication to you that I am getting help, but it is >not the kind of help which comes from a terrestrial source. > >Let us now stop to pray and ponder the best course of action for >you, for your company, for your newspaper, for Arizona, and for >the entire nation. I can guarantee to you this much: if you >will humble yourself before the Most High and ask for His special >guidance, you will receive it with unfailing reliability and >strength. You have that on My word, because it is His Word which >I am conveying to you. On His Word you can always rely. Always. > > > Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 6 of 7 > > >Thank you very much for your careful and considerate attention. > >Sincerely yours, > >/s/ Paul Mitchell > >Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >Counselor at Law, federal witness, >Citizen of Arizona state, and >private attorney general > >copy: Hon. William L. Scholl, attorney in private practice > Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals > James A. Crawford, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Tucson > Division Commander, security and investigations > Officer Jack McLamb, Phoenix Police Department (Ret.) > Postmaster, USPS, Coronado Station, Tucson > Postmaster, USPS, Downtown Station, Tucson > anonymous colleagues > >enclosures > > > Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 7 of 7 > > > # # # ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail