Time: Mon Aug 18 14:25:38 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA29908;
	Mon, 18 Aug 1997 14:26:24 -0700 (MST)
	by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA08505;
	Mon, 18 Aug 1997 14:20:30 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 14:19:12 -0700
To: Charles Pixley <pix108@frontiernet.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: U.S.A. v. Pixley
Cc: <knobby@connecti.com>

Jurisdiction has been challenged properly,
by demanding production of the regulations
which have promulgated the statute which
the U.S. Attorneys cited in their appellate
brief.  See 44 U.S.C. 1505(a).

That was 18 U.S.C. 3231 in chief, remember?

Without published regulations, a New York Citizen 
has not received Actual Notice that this statute
applies outside the federal zone.  Also,
the DCUS is mentioned in 3231, NOT the USDC, and
the DCUS IS mentioned at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B), but
the USDC is NOT mentioned in 3231 either!!!

Notice also that Title 1, U.S.C., governs the
construction of singular and plural terms:  
they must refer to the one and the same entities.

Thus, "district courts of the United States" [sic]
and   "district court  of the United States" [sic]
are one and the same, in federal statutes,
because Title 1, U.S.C., has been enacted into
positive law.

We have them in a Catch-22, and they are now
screaming like mad to be caught with an
impossibility in law. 

Lex non cogit impossibilia!!

So, expect the unexpected.  They are very
desperate, and they know it.

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com

copy:  Supreme Law School


<snip>

>Charles . . . 
>As anaother  who believes in our Constitution (and originally from Buffalo)
>I can sympathetize with what you're battleing....  You have read and seen
>decisions which the prosectution wrote . . . . the system is designed for
>you to lose!  That is the nature of the beast which was created while we
>all slept!
>
>My suggestion is now to challenge their jurisdiction . . . .they DON'T have
>it.  If you need some ideas, there anre many on the net.  I can and will
>send you what I have if you need it.
>
>Wish I could do more monetarily but I am fighting another illegal outfit .
>. .the IRS.  
>
>At any rate, check into the jurisdiction angle . . . it's their weakness.
>
>George

========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]

      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail