Time: Thu Aug 21 00:28:11 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA01812
for [address in tool bar]; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 22:21:27 -0700 (MST)
From: pmitch@primenet.com
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:04:14 -0500
Subject: SLF: Dispute erupts over "ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic]
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SCV Echo <scvecho@dixie-net.com>
*************************************************
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 21:18:19 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: pmitch@primenet.com
Subject: SLF: Dispute erupts over "ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic]
<snip>
>
>Subject: Dispute erupts over "ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic]
>
>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>
> c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
> Tucson [zip code exempt]
> ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>
> August 10, 1997
>
>Mr. John Oppedahl
>Publisher and CEO
>"The Arizona Republic"
>c/o P.O. Box 1950
>Phoenix 85001/tdc
>ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>
>Subject: Letter from Frank G. Long, dated August 8, 1997
>
>Dear Mr. Oppedahl:
>
>I have received, but not accepted, a letter from Mr. Frank G.
>Long, claiming that Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. ("PNI") has
>instructed him to take legal action against Me, to obtain a court
>order to stop what he alleges to be "unauthorized and infringing
>use of ARIZONA REPUBLIC". With that letter, he also enclosed a
>copy of a document which he described as "a copy of complaint
>that will be filed in U.S. District Court of Arizona and served"
>upon Me, unless I deliver to his office by 12:00 noon, Friday,
>August 15, 1997, a letter advising PNI that I will:
>
> (1) immediately cease using ARIZONA REPUBLIC on
> correspondence or on the Internet in connection with
> any publications or related services;
>
> (2) refrain from using ARIZONA REPUBLIC in that manner in
> the future;
>
> (3) sign an agreement confirming My acceptance of these
> demands.
>
>Mr. Oppedahl, I have very good reasons to believe that Mr. Long
>is either entirely ignorant of many important material facts, or
>he has deliberately chosen to withhold many important material
>facts from you, which you need to know immediately. In an effort
>to persuade you to reconsider the action which Mr. Long has
>threatened in writing to take, I offer the following for your
>careful consideration, review, and verification:
>
>
>1. Mr. Long refers in his letter to correspondence which I have
> been sending to the Pima County Attorney's office.
>
>It is true that I have been sending first class U.S. Mail to the
>Pima County Attorney's office. However, this mail is of a very
>confidential and sensitive nature, because it concerns several
>cases which are currently underway in state and federal courts,
>here in Tucson and also in Phoenix. I can only speculate at this
>point in time, how it was that Mr. Long obtained access to this
>correspondence and its contents. You need to ask him yourself,
>how it was that he did so. If and when you obtain an answer from
>him, would you please do Me the courtesy of relating his answer
>to Me? I would very much appreciate that.
>
>
> Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 1 of 7
>
>
>For your information, I have requested the Pima County Jury
>Commissioner to provide Me with an opportunity to testify to the
>currently convened grand jury in Pima County, concerning the
>material evidence I now have of probable cause for charging
>several government employees and private individuals in Arizona
>with numerous violations of federal and state criminal codes.
>These cases, which have thoroughly documented the material
>evidence to which I refer, are the following:
>
>
> In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center
> Company, United States District Court, Tucson, case number
> #GJ-95-1-6
>
> Mitchell v. Nordbrock, Pima County Consolidated Justice
> Court, Tucson, case number #CV-97-3438
>
> People ex rel. Mitchell v. Pima County Consolidated Justice
> Court, Superior Court of Arizona State, Tucson, case number
> #320831
>
> Swan Business Organization v. Ulan et al., Superior Court of
> the State of Arizona, Tucson, case number #315580
>
> In Re Eugene A. and Linda H. Burns, United States Bankruptcy
> Court, Tucson, case number #96-01624-TUC-LO
>
> In Re New Life Health Center Company, United States
> Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix, case number #93-06051-PHX-GBN
>
> In Re J. Fife Symington III, United States Bankruptcy Court,
> Phoenix, case number #95-08397-PHX-GBN
>
> U.S.A. v. Wallen, United States District Court, Tucson, case
> number #95-484-WDB
>
>
>I have listed the above cases in part because you have ready
>access to the docket files here in Arizona (Tucson and Phoenix).
>There are a number of additional cases which I could cite here,
>but their files are all in the custody of court clerks who are
>located in other states of the Union. Notably, the grand jury
>civil case #GJ-95-1-6 and the Wallen criminal case #95-484-WDB,
>have resulted in formal Complaints of Judicial Misconduct being
>filed with the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San
>Francisco, California. I would fully expect that the latter
>Clerk will give you access to the docket files for those two
>Judicial Misconduct Complaints, upon proper request for same.
>
>Now, with these specific cases as a factual and legal foundation
>for what I am about to tell you, I am extremely alarmed that Mr.
>Long has admitted, in writing which he transmitted to Me via
>Certified United States Mail, that he is already aware of
>correspondence which I have been sending to the Pima County
>Attorney's Office. For your information, I have had direct
>written contact with Mr. David R. White, Chief Criminal Deputy,
>and Ms. Carolyn Emerine, Program Director. Because she is the
>head of that entire government unit, I would fully expect that
>Ms. Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney, is also aware of the
>
>
> Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 2 of 7
>
>
>several written materials which I have already forwarded to Mr.
>White and to Ms. Emerine. Please contact the latter individuals
>on your own, as soon as possible, to confirm what I am telling
>you here. But, please read the rest of this letter first, okay?
>
>Without knowing any more about Mr. Long's method(s) of obtaining
>access to the information which I have supplied to the Pima
>County Attorney's office, I would have to say that his letter
>contains enough incriminating admissions to constitute sufficient
>and probable cause for Me to charge him with aiding and abetting
>a serious criminal conspiracy. It is evident to Me that the Pima
>County Attorney's office is taking affirmative steps to delay
>and/or prevent certain essential investigations from proceeding
>into the material evidence which I have assembled and cited
>above. The criminal violations to which I have been an
>eyewitness, and the evidence of which I have already verified
>under penalty of perjury, constitute proof of the following
>criminal activities:
>
>
> (1) deprivations of fundamental Rights, under color of law,
> including, but not limited to systematic violations of
> voting Rights, and jury selection policies;
>
> (2) conspiracy to deprive the fundamental Rights of
> Citizens of Arizona;
>
> (3) obstruction of correspondence transmitted through
> United States Mail to a federal grand jury;
>
> (4) perjury before a United States District Court and
> before a federal grand jury;
>
> (5) tampering with a federal grand jury;
>
> (6) obstruction of justice in proceedings before a United
> States District Court and before a federal grand jury;
>
> (7) conspiracy to commit obstruction of correspondence,
> jury tampering, obstruction of justice, perjury,
> barratry, extortion, and mail fraud;
>
> (8) placing false and misrepresentative statements in
> pleadings filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court;
>
> (9) threatening a known federal witness, and retaliating
> against a known federal witness;
>
> (10) racketeering and child kidnapping across state lines,
> and conspiracy to commit both across state lines;
>
> (11) fraud, bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud on an
> Arizona pure trust, and upon the officers of an Arizona
> pure trust;
>
> (12) theft of professional services, wrongful termination,
> contempt of court, libel, defamation, grand theft, and
> aiding and abetting one or more of the above.
>
>
> Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 3 of 7
>
>
>In support of evidence establishing probable cause for charging
>certain individuals, both in and out of government, with the
>criminal activities itemized above, I have enclosed, for your
>careful review and study, several documents which have already
>been filed in the cases cited above. I encourage you to confirm
>that these documents have, in fact, been filed, served, and
>docketed in their respective cases.
>
>
>2. In his letter, Mr. Long refers to a complaint that will be
> filed in U.S. District Court in Arizona, unless I yield to
> his demands [sic].
>
>The so-called COMPLAINT [sic] Mr. Long enclosed with his letter,
>in and of itself constitutes further probable cause for Me to
>believe that Mr. Long may already be conspiring with the very
>same individuals who are active suspects in one or more of the
>criminal activities itemized above. I refer specifically to
>Richard H. Weare, Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Arizona.
>Please note the active role which Mr. Weare has, evidently, taken
>in the conspiracy: to obstruct correspondence, to tamper with a
>federal grand jury, and to obstruct justice in proceedings before
>the U.S. District Court in Tucson last year, in #GJ-95-1-6. See
>the enclosed letter to the FBI in Tucson, in particular.
>
>To My knowledge, this conspiracy continues right up to the
>present time; I know this, because the Chief Judge of the Ninth
>Circuit has failed to act on either of the Complaints of Judicial
>Misconduct which I have filed against two (2) federal judges in
>Tucson. Mr. Long's draft COMPLAINT is first described by Mr.
>Long as a complaint that will be filed [sic], but that very
>COMPLAINT already bears civil case number #[redacted].
>
>In other words, it has already been filed in the office of Mr.
>Richard H. Weare, and a federal judge has already been assigned.
>Therefore, that proceeding has already commenced, but Mr. Long
>misleads Me into thinking that he has not yet filed it, and that
>it has not yet commenced. What is the truth here, Mr. Oppedahl?
>This misrepresentation is probable cause to charge Mr. Long with
>transmitting fraudulent and/or deliberately misleading statements
>via United States Mail; this is also a federal offense.
>
>There are a number of other misleading and misrepresentative
>statements which Mr. Long has already written in his so-called
>COMPLAINT. If you do not already have a copy of this so-called
>COMPLAINT, I do encourage you to get a true and correct version
>of the one which must already have been filed in the office of
>Mr. Richard H. Weare, in order for it to bear a valid and
>currently active case number.
>
>I do feel that it is My moral obligation to inform you that Mr.
>Long is proceeding on the basis of certain assumptions, and
>presumptions, that are demonstrably false and which completely
>eclipse any integrity his allegations might otherwise have had.
>In particular, if he is deluding himself into believing that I am
>"profiting" from My activism as a writer, investigator, Counselor
>at Law, and federal witness, he is tragically and demonstrably
>mistaken. I will now summarize the real losses I have sustained.
>
>
> Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 4 of 7
>
>
>When I worked for Elizabeth Broderick on her civil and criminal
>cases in Los Angeles, she stiffed Me for over $10,000 in legal
>services, and loaned Me a car with tampered front brakes.
>
>When I worked for LeRoy Schweitzer and his nineteen (19) other
>co-defendants in Billings, Montana, he and his associates there
>stiffed Me for over $10,000 in legal services, and then proceeded
>to delay and tamper with numerous pieces of legal mail which were
>directed to Me, care of their post office box.
>
>When I worked for Sheila Wallen in her criminal case in Tucson,
>she stiffed Me for over $3,000 in legal services; her brother
>David Wallen aided and abetted Herb Crawford in an act of grand
>theft against My private property.
>
>When I worked for the New Life Health Center ("New Life") in
>Tucson, the General Manager stiffed Me for over $2,000 in legal
>services, and damaged Me in a host of other ways which are
>already well documented, and which remain undenied.
>
>When Herb Crawford vacated My apartment very suddenly, because I
>demanded that he do so, he took with him over $1,200 worth of
>cash and office equipment, this after threatening Me twelve (12)
>times when he already knew very well that I am a federal witness.
>
>After Crawford threatened My life, and this after I provided him
>with shelter which he told Me he needed desperately, I did not
>think it was wise to keep any money around My house. I entrusted
>the New Life accountant with $3,000 of My own money, and that
>accountant, Mr. Neil T. Nordbrock, then proceeded to embezzle
>every last penny of this money, leaving Me destitute and without
>essential medical services. Do you have an adding machine?
>
>Mr. Oppedahl, if you do know the secret of squeezing blood from a
>turnip, would you please let Me in on this valuable secret?
>
>
>3. In his so-called COMPLAINT, Mr. Long expresses his desire to
> persuade a federal court to order an accounting by Me of all
> "profits derived from the providing of services through the
> unauthorized use of ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic].
>
>Mr. Oppedahl, this statement by Mr. Long makes it very clear to
>Me that he, and his unnamed accessories, have much more in mind
>than some trivial changes in the way I have chosen to label
>envelopes which I transmit through the mail. This statement
>expresses his intention to bring down upon Me the criminal force
>and undue influence of the very same conspiracy which I have
>already identified and documented within the United States
>District Court, here in Tucson, in Phoenix, and in other cities
>across this nation. Do you want to be the one who was
>responsible for authorizing such conduct by Mr. Long? Would you
>please do Me the courtesy of an honest answer to this question?
>
>If you are still a bit confused by any of the points which I have
>already made in this letter, please find a way to locate and read
>the essay entitled "Karma and the Federal Courts" in the Supreme
>
>
> Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 5 of 7
>
>
>Law Library at http://www.supremelaw.com. The United States
>District Court ("USDC") is a territorial court, identical to the
>"territorial courts of the United States" which are mentioned in
>15 U.S.C. 1121 -- one of the statues cited by Mr. Long in his
>so-called COMPLAINT; this is the court he intends to petition.
>
>Arizona is not a territory; it is a Union state, a REPUBLIC, a
>star on the flag, under the Guarantee Clause. If the attorney
>whom your corporation has hired does not yet understand this all-
>important distinction, then you and your corporation may be in
>very deep trouble, much deeper trouble than you ever imagined
>possible. I am saying this with all honesty, and with great and
>sincere earnest, because the conspiracy which I have identified
>needs to be contained, not enlarged. I am not referring here to
>some grand or vague international oligarchy; I am referring to
>the statutory definition of "conspiracy" which Congress has
>legislated at 18 U.S.C. 241. Even if you did not know anything
>about it before now, your willingness to aid and abet this
>criminal racket would still make you and your corporation liable
>as accessories after the fact; all the more so, do you now run
>the very serious and real risk of criminal complicity, because of
>the many statements of material fact which I am sharing with you
>here, all of which can, and should, be independently verified by
>you before authorizing Mr. Long to proceed as planned.
>
>In conclusion, Mr. Oppedahl, please carefully and deliberately
>reconsider the actions which Mr. Long is threatening to take
>against Me, as described in his recent letter and in the
>accompanying COMPLAINT which he has not only drafted, but also
>filed in the USDC in Phoenix, Arizona. I should think that,
>after reading and verifying all of the statements which I have
>carefully prepared for your confidential review here, you would
>at least give Me the benefits of the doubt and of a private
>hearing in your office, hopefully in front of witnesses (veteran
>reporters perhaps?) and with a good tape recorder going, to
>commemorate My verbal confirmations to you, in Person.
>
>I do honestly think that Mr. Long is proposing a course of action
>which could very well result in serious damages to your good name
>and reputation, and to the good name and reputation of your
>excellent newspaper, that are far beyond anything which you can
>presently anticipate with any degree of accuracy. I say this,
>because of the mountains of litigation in which I have already
>been involved since I began this work in 1990. The cases which I
>have cited for you above, are only a sample of the overall story
>which I have already documented, to the very best of My mental
>and physical abilities. The fact that I am still alive today
>should be an indication to you that I am getting help, but it is
>not the kind of help which comes from a terrestrial source.
>
>Let us now stop to pray and ponder the best course of action for
>you, for your company, for your newspaper, for Arizona, and for
>the entire nation. I can guarantee to you this much: if you
>will humble yourself before the Most High and ask for His special
>guidance, you will receive it with unfailing reliability and
>strength. You have that on My word, because it is His Word which
>I am conveying to you. On His Word you can always rely. Always.
>
>
> Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 6 of 7
>
>
>Thank you very much for your careful and considerate attention.
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>Counselor at Law, federal witness,
>Citizen of Arizona state, and
>private attorney general
>
>copy: Hon. William L. Scholl, attorney in private practice
> Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
> James A. Crawford, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Tucson
> Division Commander, security and investigations
> Officer Jack McLamb, Phoenix Police Department (Ret.)
> Postmaster, USPS, Coronado Station, Tucson
> Postmaster, USPS, Downtown Station, Tucson
> anonymous colleagues
>
>enclosures
>
>
> Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 7 of 7
>
>
> # # #
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail