Time: Fri Aug 22 12:10:33 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA07647; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 12:08:53 -0700 (MST) by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA17540; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 11:57:58 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 11:56:31 -0700 To: Jim Ormond <jimo@astea.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Conspiracy Theorists Invade College (fwd) References: <3.0.3.16.19970822065628.314f8662@pop.primenet.com> At 12:33 PM 8/22/97 -0400, you wrote: > >Hi Paul, > >1) The pictures of the "tramps" show THREE "hobos" not two. Thanks. Now that you mention it, there were 3, not 2. I was thinking 2, because I recall that 2 were identified by Mark Lane, but the third was not. I could be entirely wrong about this identification question, however. Lane would be the kind of investigator who would have identified all 3, so I am not doing him justice here. >2) Why wouldn't he hand the rifle DIRECTLY to his assistant on the LEFT?? Good question. I don't know, for sure. If he was supporting the barrel with his left hand, that makes more sense, doesn't it? I am, admittedly, not an expert on ALL of these details, but it seems that we are now very VERY close to solving this crime, once and for all. I am not a firearms expert; far from it. I have only rarely touched a gun. > Do you have knowledge that the scenario you described > actually happened?? A good place to start is "Best Evidence," which did a unique job of tracing the chain of possession. It is clear to me, after reading all of that book (twice), that JFK's head was sectioned BEFORE the authopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital; there is even an FBI report which author David Lifton uncovered, in which 2 FBI agents (the ONLY two civilians at that autopsy) admitted that the head had been "sectioned" (i.e. cut with scalpels). The autopsy surgeon admitted to having burned his first set of notes. Any autopsy surgeon would see exactly what the FBI had reported: The head had been hit with scalpels BEFORE they unzipped the body bag on the autopsy table. Now, here is my theory: the origin of the head wound would have been easy to trace, by examining the exact extent of the damages to JFK's cranium. You may recall, there is even a photo of an FBI agent, at the press conference at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, showing this agent pointing his right index finger to his right temple area; in other words, this is where the fatal bullet entered JFK's cranium. Using modern forensics, that would have pointed directly to the grassy knoll, so, this "best evidence" had to be altered, to throw everyone off the track, which is exactly what happened, by design. In forensics, experts refer to the evidence on a dead body as the "best evidence". If I were to be accused of shooting you in the stomach, but there is no stomach wound, then I am innocent of that charge. JFK's body did NOT come off Air Force One on national television, with Jackie Kennedy climbing into that hydraulic cargo truck which was raised to meet JFK's casket. The body was in a grey metal casket which made its way into a non-descript Navy ambulance, to be hurried to the unknown location where the DOA surgery was performed, PRIOR TO the autopsy. Lifton's evidence is overwhelming proof that this actually did happen; where, we are still not sure. I am not an eyewitness, only a motivated Citizen who has been following the progress of the research, on and off, ever since "Rush to Judgment" and "Plausible Denial." I was waiting for my Geometry teacher to come into the classroom in high school. Father Brennan was NEVER late; but, that morning, he was VERY late. When he arrived, he was as white as a sheet, and we all went into shock when he told us what had just happened. Many of us loved Jack Kennedy, in our own way. Like so many other Americans, I remember exactly the moment when I learned of the assassination, and I have never been the same since that terrible moment. Never! Please forgive me for expressing so much emotion, but the same desire to solve that crime has also motivated me to solve an even larger crime; and that much larger crime is the federal income tax, as presently administered by the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic]. I will not rest, until and unless they are totally dismantled. This is my mission now. It used to be "Mission Impossible," but I would be the last one to say that, after all we have accomplished in the past 7 years. They are beginning to break up fast, and I now realize there is a reason why I am still alive: I am obviously getting help, and it is not from a terrestrial source. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com > >Just got done reading your book, Federal Zone ..., which is an >incredible work. Is John Trumane your pen name? Any idea how many >people have purchased/read your book? Thank you. It was put up on the Internet without permission of the author, and we have received maybe 5 to 10 shareware donations, total, since 1992. > >Any statistics on the number of people that are "dropping out" of the >FRB/IRS system? It is escalating; hard numbers are impossible to obtain. Last I heard, it was up to 1-in-5, and accelerating. If you read Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF, in the Supreme Law Library ("SLL"), you will begin to appreciate how far we have come in busting the IRS extortion racket, and we are doing it with lots of very positive repercussions, such as our recent work decoding Title 28. This is very VERY exciting progress we have to report. Please tell your friends about all the documents in SLL; a whole lot more are coming. Gilbertson's case is only one of 30 we are now loading into that library. /s/ Paul Mitchell > >Have you heard of Peter Kershaw from Heal Our Land? He offers a Common >Law course. Would you recommend it? What is the best way to learn the >Law, in your opinion? Read. Read. And read some more! Then, when you have done this much reading, read some more still. We now manage a 10 gigabyte text database! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com > >How about Dave Miller and his "Citizen In Party" idea? Have you heard of >him? One of his followers heard that we had filed Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF at the 8th Circuit in St. Louis, but he never asked how to obtain a copy. Then, we scanned the Appellees' Brief, and offered to email it to people, on request only. So, this follower requested the U.S. Brief, without first reading the OPENING BRIEF. Why would anybody do that? The Appellees' Brief makes no sense, unless you know to what they are responding. When I asked this follower why he had done such a thing, his answer was totally lame, imho. I am keeping my distance from Miller, for reasons I am not at liberty to disclose. The incident I just described is just one of many like this. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com > >Paul, I realize that your time is very valuable. I intend to purchase >additional copies of your book to lend or give as gifts. I will also make >a donation(s) for responding to my questions. Just enroll in the Supreme Law School: $10/month, declining for additional months prepaid. See the Supreme Law Firm's home page at URL: http://www.supremelaw.com The SLS registration forms can be reached by clicking on the Supreme Law School in the left margin of the home page. /s/ Paul Mitchell > >Thanks, Jim. > > >On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote: > >> >> -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List >> >> It doesn't require mental retardation, >> or genetic defects, to understand what >> is happening in the Zapruder Film, >> at the precise moment JFK's head was blown >> to pieces. Abraham Zapruder captured the >> "Polaroid Woman," a lady standing >> across the street from him, pointing right >> at the President's car, as a high-velocity >> bullet left the rifle of "Badge Man" >> standing behind the picket fence at the >> top of the grassy knoll. Her one photo >> was snapped within one second of the >> fatal shot, and she has Badge Man on >> film, no hat, wearing a Dallas Police >> uniform and badge, with two assistants, >> one on either side. >> >> Here is my explanation: >> >> Badge Man is a trained assassin, imported >> from far away, very skilled in single-shot >> hits, using a very precise hunting rifle, >> with powerful scope. He squeezes off the >> shot, hands the rifle to the assistant >> on his right, who then hands him a Dallas >> Police hat, while the assistant on the left >> takes the rifle and disposes of it. >> >> As Dallas Police converge rapidly on the >> scene, Badge Man tells them he has the >> area covered, and there is nobody there. >> >> Meanwhile, the assistants are heading for >> a moving boxcar passing through the railway >> yard, behind the grassy knoll. Dallas Police >> converge on the train, stop it, search it, >> and find two "hobos" in newly laundered >> clothes and recently shined shoes. These >> "hobos" are marched through Dealey Plaza, >> where many photographs are taken of them, >> with their police "escort." The testimony >> in Hunt v. Liberty Lobby, defended by >> famous author and attorney Mark Lane, indicates >> that two of these hobos may have been E. Howard >> Hunt and Frank Sturgess, of Watergate infamy. >> >> There, that wasn't so bad, was it? >> >> An animated sequence of key frames from >> the Zapruder Film is now available on the >> Internet. Polaroid Woman is clearly visible >> in this sequence, although the version of >> the Internet animation which I saw, did not >> draw any attention to her. I have since >> contacted the webmaster of that site, and >> he agrees that Polaroid Woman is clearly >> visible, raising her camera to click off >> what has to be THE most important single >> photo ever taken of JFK's murder scene. >> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell >> http://www.supremelaw.com >> >> >> >> >> >> At 03:19 AM 8/22/97 -0400, you wrote: >> > >> >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List >> > >> >From: IN%"nobody@best.com" "Unprivileged user" 22-AUG-1997 00:10:51.02 >> >To: IN%"KALLISTE@delphi.com" >> >CC: >> >Subj: Conspiracy Nation >> > >> >Return-path: <nobody@shell6.ba.best.com> >> > by delphi.com (PMDF V5.1-8 #23839) >> > with ESMTP id <01IMPY1OS0TC90XCP1@delphi.com> for KALLISTE@delphi.com; Fri, >> > 22 Aug 1997 00:10:09 EDT >> > id VAA01349 for KALLISTE@DELPHI.COM; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 21:06:41 -0700 (PDT) >> >Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 21:06:41 -0700 (PDT) >> >From: Unprivileged user <nobody@best.com> >> >Subject: Conspiracy Nation >> >To: KALLISTE@delphi.com >> >Message-id: <199708220406.VAA01349@shell6.ba.best.com> >> > >> > >> > Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 10 Num. 89 >> > ======================================= >> > ("Quid coniuratio est?") >> > >> > >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> >DANGEROUS CONSPIRACY CONFERENCE PLANS ATTACK ON COMMUNITY COLLEGE >> >================================================================= >> >Four Dangerous Minds Said To Be Planning Invasion Of Small School >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Panic Sets In! >> > -------------- >> > Gerald Posner and "Chip" Berlet Help "Circle the Wagons!" >> > --------------------------------------------------------- >> > Will YOUR College Be Next!? >> > --------------------------- >> > >> >An article in the Los Angeles Times, dated August 21, 1997 >> >("Community College Course Claims JFK Conspiracy"), warns readers >> >of an apparent stealthy attack planned by certain "conspiracy >> >theorists" on an idyllic community college. Said to be part of >> >the invasion were SHERMAN SKOLNICK, a telephone-addicted mutterer >> >on supposed dark plots, DAVE EMORY, who spreads his seductive >> >ideas via small radio stations, JOHN JUDGE, a local Washington, >> >DC character, and MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER, sometime scribbler for a >> >fringe newspaper. >> > >> >The ever-alert L.A. Times warns that the South Orange County >> >Community College District "has approved a course that claims a >> >conspiracy was behind the assassination of President John F. >> >Kennedy and has committed $5,000 for flying in four guest >> >speakers..." >> > >> >Rushing to guard against such conspiracy ideas being discussed >> >on, of all places, a college campus, was the Anti-Defamation >> >League (ADL), which may have been correct in accusing ONE of the >> >four invited speakers, Mr. Piper, of anti-Semitism. From there >> >it was just a short hop-skip-and-a-jump to the conclusion that >> >"if one speaker is anti-Semitic, others must also be." At least >> >that is what the L.A. Times article directly states in its >> >headline, "SOME scheduled speakers contend [JFK] killing was >> >planned by Israel." >> > >> >Although too-trusting Americans may wonder how such as SKOLNICK >> >(himself an orthodox Jew), EMORY (a well-respected anti-fascist >> >researcher), and JUDGE (a tireless investigator of CIA >> >skullduggery) could possibly be "anti-Semitic," Gerald Posner (an >> >"Oswald did it" stalwart) and John Foster "Chip" Berlet >> >(described as an "examiner of authoritarian thinking") were quick >> >to stomp out the question. Regarding the fevered thinkers about >> >to shamble onto campus, Posner exclaimed that he was "aghast" at >> >hearing of the planned course. He added that a conference on >> >conspiracies behind the Kennedy assassination strikes him "as >> >similar to the notion that the Holocaust was a hoax." John >> >Foster Berlet, named after beloved State Department personage >> >John Foster Dulles, on hearing of the sneaky thought-crime attack >> >on the hallowed halls of academe, exclaimed, "Oh, get out of >> >here!" >> > >> >Others were not so kind regarding the planned invasion of the >> >Hallowed Halls of Correct Thought. "All of this is out-and-out >> >anti-Semitism," fumed Cheryl Altman of Saddleback Community >> >College. Roy Bauer, a philosophy instructor at Irvine Valley >> >Community College, called the invited guests "crackpots." And >> >Joyce Greenspan of the ADL darkly warned that some of the planned >> >speakers write for the feared "extremist organizations." (Since >> >Skolnick writes for Conspiracy Nation, among other publications, >> >the inference is clear: CONSPIRACY NATION ITSELF MAY BE AN >> >"EXTREMIST" ORGANIZATION.) >> > >> >This editor has learned that a puzzled Sherman Skolnick never >> >made a definite committment to attend the proposed conference. >> >Reportedly, John Judge had never even been formally asked to >> >attend. Emory and Piper could not be reached for comment as we >> >go to press. >> > >> > + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + >> > >> >For related stories, visit: >> >http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html >> >http://feustel.mixi.net >> > >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those >> > of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief. >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation." >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> >Mailing List Yanked for "Policy Reasons." New Mailing List Planned. >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > DONATIONS APPRECIATED >> > Send to: Brian Redman, 310 S. Prairie St. (#202) >> > Champaign, IL 61820 >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> >Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc? >> >(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom >> >----------------------------------------------------------------- >> >Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt. >> >Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et >> > pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >> >-> Posted by: KALLISTE@delphi.com >> > >> > >> > >> >> ======================================================================== >> Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness >> B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine >> >> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night >> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU >> website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this >> >> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall >> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. >> ======================================================================== >> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> >> -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >> -> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >> >> > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail