Time: Fri Aug 22 05:35:29 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA16126 for [address in tool bar]; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 21:50:43 -0700 (MST) From: pmitch@primenet.com Date: 21 Aug 97 23:45:52 -5:00 Subject: SLF: "Missing" children photos at IRS office MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SCV Echo <scvecho@dixie-net.com> ************************************************* Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 23:01:40 -0500 To: scvecho@dixie-net.com From: pmitch@primenet.com Subject: SLF: "Missing" children photos at IRS office <snip> > >It was not a good day for the conspiracy >in Tucson, my friend. I hand-delivered the >criminal complaint to DOJ and to the Arizona >AG's office. As I headed back towards >my car from the AG's office, I had to >walk right in front of the IRS office. >So, since I had an envelope for one of >the accused already in my briefcase, >rather than mail it, I hand-delivered it >to their public counter. > >Metal detectors are always fun for me, >because the metal support in these shoes >I got, as a gift, always sets off the >court metal detector. So, I use it as a >chance to joke with the guard, and >take bets whether or not the shoes >will give me away, once again. This >time, however, their detector did not >pick up the shoes, even though the >Superior Court detector does so >every time. Does this say anything, >or not? Probably not. Read on: > >After clearing the X-ray machine and >putting my buckle back on, a free standing >marquis caught my attention: it had the >photos of 7 or 8 young children, ages >5 to 8, or so. Each had been photographed >like a WANTED poster, and each had the >words "MISSING" over their heads. Each child >a unique beauty, now gone, probably forever. > >After what you told me, I grew steadily >more angry. Here, in the downtown federal >building in Tucson, they have the gall to >make it look like they do care so much [sic] >for the children. But, of course, it is >all a big deception, like the IRS itself. >These photos were proof positive to me >that there were people in that building >who knew full well what had likely happened >to those little people. > >"What will you give for a nice new liver >donation? $50,000? How about $75,000? >We will be happy to lien on your life >insurance, or your stock portfolio. >You get the money, and we'll get the >organ. When do you need it?" > >Or something like that ... > >I went from there, to the Post Office, >where all the counter clerks know me >very well by now. I went to the far >end, where smiling Rosie was working >today. She always asks what's going on, >so I told her. This cold, clammy look >came over her normally bright face, and >then I began to weep, dropping my head into >my hands, as I told her the conspiracy is >harvesting healthy organs from kidnapped >children, right after killing them. > >Rosie let me stand there, as the rest >of the Post Office became suddenly >quiet and still, as I shed my tears, out loud, >onto her clean and well ordered counter. >We fumbled together with stamps and money >orders and envelopes and receipts and did >absolutely everything wrong. > >I even went out the "in", and heard Rick's >voice reminding me about the other door. >He was the only one saying anything, at that >particular moment. > >It was not a good day for the conspiracy. > > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >http://www.supremelaw.com > > > >At 07:09 PM 8/21/97 -0400, you wrote: >>The Attorney stated that any more letters to the Publisher would be >>taken as Harassment, but what about the News Desk of the competition? >> >>Think they would love to hear about a scam or patent attorney kick some >>poor teacher around, because he signed his letters with Arizona Republic? >> >>How asinine! >> >>Just moving a little slow on this today, that's all. My nature is to jump >>into the ring and kick ass, but I guess I am maturing, or something. >> >>I WILL do anything I can, to help you, Paul! >> >>I agreed to call him, but I want to be sure of my tenor and statement; >>perhaps a letter from me, the "Federal Witness," would carry more weight, >>but of course then they have a piece of evidence too? What do you >>think? > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail