Time: Fri Aug 29 19:16:41 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA15224;
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 19:15:19 -0700 (MST)
by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA21581;
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 19:13:21 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 19:11:44 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
I believe Black's displays a statutory
copyright notice, and is sold commercially.
I found a good used one, in our local
second-hand book store. Check around;
there is now a paperback version too.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 08:51 PM 8/29/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>
>During a heated debate with a left wing, 25yrs of service, state employee, I
>made reference to a portion of the document as standing law. She informed me
>"that document holds no weight of law".
>
>Is there a URL where I can axcess Black's Law Dictionary so I may re-kindle
>said debate
>
>rod
>RAmes0@aol.com
>that's ^ a zero
>---------------------
>Forwarded message:
>From: pmitch@primenet.com (Paul Andrew Mitchell)
>Reply-to: snetnews@world.std.com
>To: snetnews@world.std.com
>Date: 97-08-28 14:35:48 EDT
>
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>How did you come to "understand" this?
>
>Confer at "Declaration of Independence"
>in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
>(with pronunciations).
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>http://www.supremelaw.com
>
>
>
>At 10:51 PM 8/26/97 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>>
>>As I understand it, The Declaration of Independance "holds no weight of
>law".
>> Please correct me if I am wrong and give ref.
>>
>>rod
>>---------------------
>>Forwarded message:
>>From: pmitch@primenet.com (Paul Andrew Mitchell)
>>Reply-to: snetnews@world.std.com
>>Date: 97-08-21 17:07:02 EDT
>>
>>
>>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>>
>>The treaties do not and cannot "grant"
>>rights here in America, because these treaties
>>are designed to reinforce and bolster
>>the fundamental Rights which are recognized
>>by our local constitutions. Our several
>>constitutions already recognize the Source
>>of our rights, and that Source is not our
>>governments. Read the Declaration of
>>Independence, for proof. There is nothing
>>in these treaties which could ever be construed
>>to override, or supersede, this Declaration.
>>
>>In other nations of the world, their governments
>>may, in fact, be recognized as the "source" of
>>their human rights, but not here! That was the
>>unique situation which motivated Congress to
>>attach these explicit reservations in the first
>>place.
>>
>>Take, for example, the obligation that
>>states party to the treaties will take steps
>>to guarantee "effective judicial remedies" [sic], and
>>to develop the "possibilities of effective
>>judicial remedies". There is nothing in such a
>>goal which would impair or impede the magnificent
>>body of law which has evolved from the due process
>>clause in our Fifth Amendment. It is very easy
>>to demonstrate that the U.S. has failed miserably,
>>for neglecting to develop the possibilities of
>>effective judicial remedies; on the contrary,
>>they are now actively obstructing a well conceived,
>>and properly filed, challenge to the constitutionality
>>of our federal and state jury selection processes.
>>See Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF in the Supreme Law
>>Library for evidence proof positive.
>>
>>That, right there, is probable cause to sue the
>>U.S. in the local county courts, for obstructing
>>and impeding effective judicial remedies, and to
>>compel them, via Mandamus, to get their house in
>>order, or find themselves in contempt of court,
>>and possibly also prison, until and unless they
>>start to obey the supreme Law of this Land.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>>copy: Supreme Law School
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>At 05:29 PM 8/20/97 PST, you wrote:
>>> <I think this gives the human Rights treaties much more importance
>>> than they have enjoyed hitherto.
>>>
>>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>>> http://www.supremelaw.com>
>>>
>>> Not really. There is no such thing as "Human Rights".
>>>
>>> These treaties simpy grant PRIVLEGES, not rights. For Rights are
>>> inalienable, meaning they cannot be rescinded, rejected, nor taken
>>> away. Priveleges are granted by governments (treaties, UN shit,
>>> etc.). Since they are granted by government, they can be taken away
>>> by government.
>>>
>>> Since the UN is, fundamentally, an atheist organization, the "human
>>> rights" they speak of are nothing more than government granted
>>> priveleges. There is no freedom whatsoever under any UN treaty, nor
>>> can any rights be granted nor abridged by Treaty.
>>>
>>> Treaties and Rights have nothing to do with each other.
>>>
>>> Treaties are agreements between governments. Rights are a gift of
>>> Divine Providence.
>>>
>>> cordially,
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan Terry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
>>>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
>>>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>========================================================================
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>>B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>>
>>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>>email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
>>website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>>
>>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>>========================================================================
>>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>>-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>
>>
>>
>>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>>-> Posted by: RAmes0@aol.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>========================================================================
>Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>
>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
>website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>
>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>========================================================================
>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>
>
>
>
>
>--------
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: RAmes0@aol.com
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail