Time: Mon Sep 01 11:42:05 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA29253;
Mon, 1 Sep 1997 11:40:29 -0700 (MST)
by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA13264;
Mon, 1 Sep 1997 11:38:35 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 11:37:27 -0700
To: <drctalk@drcnet.org>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Complaint against "Charles P. Conrad"
I am making public my formal complaint
against the message we received from
Charles P. Conrad below.
We do admit to making a mistake for
having sent him the message which
follows.
On the other hand, we have gone to great
extent, within our limited resources,
to update our email database, in honor of
ALL requests from users who wish to to be
removed, for whatever reason. Mr. Conrad's
name has been removed from all of our
broadcast lists; this was done quite
some time ago.
We have also assumed the cost of investigating,
developing, and disseminating an email privacy
proposal, which we voluntarily share with those
we think might benefit from it. This proposal
has been very well received, I am happy to
report.
Now, Mr. Conrad is threatening to do
real damage to us, and to the website
which we have developed at great expense,
for what we can honestly say was a mistake.
I do feel that Mr. Conrad's threats here
need to be taken very seriously, and I have
made the decision to go public with our concerns,
so that others who may be adversely affected
by his threats, or any attempts by him actually
to inflict damages, can take proper precautions.
I would also ask Mr. Conrad to reconsider
his intenions, because such a retaliation
by him, for an honest mistake, could constitute
a serious felony on his part, one which we
will not hestitate to prosecute with every
means at our disposal.
I am saying this, because the resources which
we plan to make available at our website
together constitute the culmination of
seven full years of dedicated work. We are not
about to permit some vicious deed to compromise
that work, even if done by one disgruntled email
recipient who has received one too many messages --
by mistake, I must repeat.
Thank you all for your consideration.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School, Friends
Dear Postmaster,
Because we made a mistake, this man now
threatens to "hack" our website.
Do you regard this as appropriate?
If not, please take disciplinary action.
Thank you.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 10:11 AM 9/1/97 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>
>I HAVE ASKED YOU ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS TO CEASE AND DESIST SENDING ME ANY
MORE OF THESE UNSOLICITED MESSAGES.
>
>
>IF YOU AGAIN IGNORE MY REQUEST, I WILL TAKE EVERY ACTION AVAILABLE TO ME
BOTH LEGAL AND NOT SO LEGAL TO HACK YOU INTO OBLIVION!!!!!!!!!!
>
>YOU WON'T EVEN BE ABLE TO FIND YOUR WEB PAGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>GET THE MESSAGE, ASSHOLE?
>
>
>
>
>At 10:00 AM 9/1/97 -0700, you wrote:
>> [PLEASE FORWARD TO YOUR FAVORITE MEDIA]
>>
>>
>>Dear Local Media:
>>
>>The current associates of the Supreme Law Firm
>>have been working more than seven full years to
>>develop a reliable and authoritative database
>>on the supreme Law in America, and its many
>>applications to daily life.
>>
>>We are happy to announce that the Supreme Law
>>Library ("SLL") will soon host almost ALL of the
>>many pleadings which we have authored, or adapted,
>>during this period of time. We are experts in
>>law and computers, and We find the combination
>>to be quite exciting. We hope you will agree.
>>
>>We strongly encourage you to take advantage of
>>this powerful resource. Right now, you can
>>browse to this URL, and download the OPENING
>>BRIEF in the case of USA v. Gilbertson. This
>>BRIEF has assembled some of the most compelling
>>arguments We have ever made, within the limits
>>imposed upon Us by local court rules (50 pages).
>>
>>After reviewing these and related documents,
>>I would be very interested to know if you would
>>still choose to label People like Us as radicals,
>>misfits, fanatics, or extremists.
>>
>>Would it be too much to ask you to read these
>>documents, and then to answer the question which
>>I have posed above?
>>
>>I would be very appreciative of your honest and
>>straightforward answers. We are interested in
>>elevating the dialogue in America, and invite you
>>to join Us in this ambitious task.
>>
>>Thank you very much, in advance, for your kindness
>>and consideration.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>>copy: Supreme Law School, Supreme Law Webmaster
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail