Time: Mon Sep 01 11:45:25 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA00360; Mon, 1 Sep 1997 11:43:35 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 11:43:35 -0700 (MST) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 1997 14:43:24 -0400 Originator: drctalk@drcnet.org From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] To: Multiple recipients of list <drctalk@drcnet.org> Subject: Complaint against "Charles P. Conrad" I am making public my formal complaint against the message we received from Charles P. Conrad below. We do admit to making a mistake for having sent him the message which follows. On the other hand, we have gone to great extent, within our limited resources, to update our email database, in honor of ALL requests from users who wish to to be removed, for whatever reason. Mr. Conrad's name has been removed from all of our broadcast lists; this was done quite some time ago. We have also assumed the cost of investigating, developing, and disseminating an email privacy proposal, which we voluntarily share with those we think might benefit from it. This proposal has been very well received, I am happy to report. Now, Mr. Conrad is threatening to do real damage to us, and to the website which we have developed at great expense, for what we can honestly say was a mistake. I do feel that Mr. Conrad's threats here need to be taken very seriously, and I have made the decision to go public with our concerns, so that others who may be adversely affected by his threats, or any attempts by him actually to inflict damages, can take proper precautions. I would also ask Mr. Conrad to reconsider his intenions, because such a retaliation by him, for an honest mistake, could constitute a serious felony on his part, one which we will not hestitate to prosecute with every means at our disposal. I am saying this, because the resources which we plan to make available at our website together constitute the culmination of seven full years of dedicated work. We are not about to permit some vicious deed to compromise that work, even if done by one disgruntled email recipient who has received one too many messages -- by mistake, I must repeat. Thank you all for your consideration. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School, Friends Dear Postmaster, Because we made a mistake, this man now threatens to "hack" our website. Do you regard this as appropriate? If not, please take disciplinary action. Thank you. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 10:11 AM 9/1/97 -0700, you wrote: > > > >I HAVE ASKED YOU ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS TO CEASE AND DESIST SENDING ME ANY MORE OF THESE UNSOLICITED MESSAGES. > > >IF YOU AGAIN IGNORE MY REQUEST, I WILL TAKE EVERY ACTION AVAILABLE TO ME BOTH LEGAL AND NOT SO LEGAL TO HACK YOU INTO OBLIVION!!!!!!!!!! > >YOU WON'T EVEN BE ABLE TO FIND YOUR WEB PAGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > >GET THE MESSAGE, ASSHOLE? > > > > >At 10:00 AM 9/1/97 -0700, you wrote: >> [PLEASE FORWARD TO YOUR FAVORITE MEDIA] >> >> >>Dear Local Media: >> >>The current associates of the Supreme Law Firm >>have been working more than seven full years to >>develop a reliable and authoritative database >>on the supreme Law in America, and its many >>applications to daily life. >> >>We are happy to announce that the Supreme Law >>Library ("SLL") will soon host almost ALL of the >>many pleadings which we have authored, or adapted, >>during this period of time. We are experts in >>law and computers, and We find the combination >>to be quite exciting. We hope you will agree. >> >>We strongly encourage you to take advantage of >>this powerful resource. Right now, you can >>browse to this URL, and download the OPENING >>BRIEF in the case of USA v. Gilbertson. This >>BRIEF has assembled some of the most compelling >>arguments We have ever made, within the limits >>imposed upon Us by local court rules (50 pages). >> >>After reviewing these and related documents, >>I would be very interested to know if you would >>still choose to label People like Us as radicals, >>misfits, fanatics, or extremists. >> >>Would it be too much to ask you to read these >>documents, and then to answer the question which >>I have posed above? >> >>I would be very appreciative of your honest and >>straightforward answers. We are interested in >>elevating the dialogue in America, and invite you >>to join Us in this ambitious task. >> >>Thank you very much, in advance, for your kindness >>and consideration. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>http://www.supremelaw.com >> >>copy: Supreme Law School, Supreme Law Webmaster ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail