Time: Tue Sep 02 13:11:37 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13862;
Tue, 2 Sep 1997 12:24:18 -0700 (MST)
id PAA21283; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
id PAA21275; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:19:01 -0400 (EDT)
id AA02190; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 14:37:13 -0400
by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA18723
for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 11:36:43 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 1997 11:36:43 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: Urgent : Princess DIANA update
References: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970902063802.19952E-100000@comet.connix.com>
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
Was there an oil slick on the tunnel road surface?
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 02:14 PM 9/2/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>RevCOAL wrote:
>>
>> -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>>
>> On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Canadian ACT!ON Coalition wrote:
>> >CNN screwed up like usual... if the Benz was going 120 MPH then that
>> >would be 192 KPH... maybe it was... that car can easily exceed 250 kph,
>>
>> Both CNN and the Mercedes Benz company are giving figures in MILES per
>> hour...
>>
>
>NOW, their denying earlier reports about the speedometer. They're
>stating now that it read 0 kpm. Also, like Canadian ActOn mentioned,
>why would a car in Europe have MPH? Again, news is getting facts wrong.
>
>> >and if it was going 120 KPH then he was going about the same speed as
>> >most traffic on the 401 and the QEW here in Ontario, 120 KPH is 75
>> >mph... average cruising speed for most people on these highways, and in
>>
>> But they weren't on a highway, they were on a downtown city street, of
>> a major city which stays open 24-hours, near a major tourist
>> attraction, so even tho there wasn't rush hour traffic to deal with,
>> there IS still a fair amount of vehicular and pedestrian traffic in
>> the area....
>>
>> Even if they were going at 'only' 75mph, the posted speed limit in the
>> tunnel is 30mph...
>
>True, but nobody in Paris goes 30 mph.
>>
>> >a Mercedes 75 mph is a joke... if the truth be known, I would bet that
>> >most of the traffic in the tunnel that night was cruising in that tunnel
>> >at anywhere between 100 and 120 KPH.
>>
>> That's like saying traffic regularly flows at 75+ mph thru the Lincoln
>> Tunnel at 11pm on a Sunday nite -- and it just ain't so...
>
>This is not the Lincoln Tunnel in NYC - it's Paris.
>>
>> >If the way they drive in Montrial is any indication of how they drive in
>> >Paris, then I would surmise the Benz probably was going 120 KPH, but I
>> >doubt if it was any faster than that.
>
>I've been to Paris and everybody drives FAST and CRAZY. It's like one
>continuous game of "chicken". Even during the busiest and most crowded
>times. You can't compare Paris and NYC. Driving in NYC is like a
>country drive compared to Paris.
>>
>> As I said, CNN is sticking by the story of the speedometer being stuck
>> on 121 MILES per hour...and the Mercedes Benz company themselves have
>> said the extent of damage to the car shows that it was travelling in
>> excess of 100 MILES per hour -- they definitely did not say
>> KILOMETERS....
>
>No they're not - latest statement is that the speedometer was at zero.
>>
>> >> The Lincoln Tunnel isn't that crowded at 11pm either, but no one
>> >> should be driving thru it at over 100mph either...
>> >
>> >120 KPH = 75 MPH or your average highway cruising speed...
>>
>> 75 mph is NOT the average highwy cruising speed here in the northeast,
>> where it's around 60mph, and definitely not the speed in NYC, which is
>> from 0 to 30 (if you're lucky and don't get stuck in gridlock! <g>)...
>> even late on a Saturday night, cruising speed in the Lincoln Tunnel is
>> only around 50...
>
>60 mph is NOT average on NJ turnpike - more like 65. Speedlimit is 55
>but everybody goes at least 10 miles faster. It's even accepted by the
>State Troopers. Other state's major highways now have speedlimits of 65
>and 70 MPH.
>>
>> >not a wreckless speed in my books.
>>
>> It IS considered reckless here in the northeast, and definitely
>> reckless in a fairly populated downtown city street....
>>
>> Irregardless, whatever speed they were going was OVER the POSTED
>> LIMIT...hence, they were breaking the law...
>>
>> >IF there was anything sinister behind this "accident", one way to
>> >satisfy yur curiosity is to try and get the names of the ambulance
>> >attendants, the rescue people, anyone on-site with a camera immediately
>> >after the accident, eyewitnesses, the attending physicians and nursing
>> >staff. After you have this information and there is something going on
>> >besides what the media is feeding us, I would suspect that some of those
>> >people will catch something akin to the Arkansas flu, or that strange
>> >affliction caught by over forty people close to the real information
>> >pertaining to the JFK murder.
>>
>> If they weren't all deliberate 'plants' to begin with...if someone has
>> so much clout to pull off a 'hit' like this, they have enough clout to
>> make sure the ambulance and attendants, at least, are their own
>> operatives...as for the ER staff, well, look how long it took the
>> Dallas doctors to come out and say they disagreed with the Warren
>> Commission...
>>
>> As far as eyewitnesses, the only ones I've seen on the media are the
>> ones touting 'the party line' (ie. those lousy paparazzi were swarming
>> all over the crash site and not offering help -- conveniently ignoring
>> the fact that it seems none of these eyewitnesses were offering help,
>> either...)...seems like anyone first on the scene has been spirited
>> away to be 'debriefed', especially anyone who took photos immediately
>> after the crash...
>
>The major problem with the "facts" we're getting is that the news
>stations are all in a race to get the latest "facts" out to the public
>before confirming them. I was watching CNN and MNBC on Saturday
>nite/Sunday morning. Most of the witnesses were people who had NOT been
>driving. They were on the streets, at cafes. One of the first
>"witnesses" after the accident stated they saw Diana after the accident,
>out of the car screaming.. "Dodi, Dodi".?!?!
>>
>> Donna ;-)
>>
>>
>> -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>> -> Posted by: RevCOAL <revcoal@connix.com>
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: janice r <"bonneville@worldnet.att.net"@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail