Time: Wed Sep 03 17:00:54 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20553; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 17:00:30 -0700 (MST) id TAA22949; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 19:55:59 -0400 (EDT) id TAA22894; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 19:55:50 -0400 (EDT) id AA19251; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 19:55:39 -0400 by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA05138; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 16:55:19 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 16:55:19 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SNET: SLF: MOTION FOR REHEARING AND RECONSIDERATION -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List >Subject: SLS: MOTION FOR REHEARING AND RECONSIDERATION > >Dear Clients, > >Karl Kleinpaste and I have an update to >share with you, at URL: > > http://pocari-sweat.jprc.com/~karl/govt/lawsuit/ > > >Go to the latest document in Karl's on-line docket: > > MOTION FOR REHEARING AND RECONSIDERATION, filed 9/3/97 > > >Here is a summary of the argument: > > >Mr. Clarke, alleging to be the U.S. Attorney representing >all named defendants, has not produced credentials. > >Therefore: > >1. He does not occupy the office of United States Attorney; > >2. As a result of 1, he cannot represent Defendant United States; > >3. Even if he had proven he lawfully occupies the office > of the United States Attorney, said office has never > been granted Power of Attorney to represent Defendant IRS, > by Act of Congress; > >4. Similarly, even if he had proven he occupies said office, > it has never been granted Power of Attorney to represent > private litigants like Defendant Chafin; > >5. IRS is not a department, bureau, or organization within > the United States Department of the Treasury, so the > statutes which Clarke has cited, grant no Power of Attorney > to the office of United States Attorney to represent IRS. > > >Therefore, none of the named defendants, including the >United States, the Internal Revenue Service, and Mr. Chafin, >has yet made ANY proper appearances, setting the stage for >a default judgment. > >However, Plaintiff Kleinpaste is now insisting that a >STAY OF PROCEEDINGS is proper, pending discovery of >documents requested under the FOIA, or formal admission >that the requested documents do not, in fact, exist. > >Failure to take the requisite oath of office is grounds >for ouster via Quo Warranto; see Gilbertson's OPENING >BRIEF for a thorough exposition of this legal history. >Silence also activates estoppel by acquiescence, pursuant >to Carmine v. Bowen. > >Plaintiff Kleinpaste has now provided the USDC with ample legal >justification for permitting a FOIA suit to proceed in the DCUS, >pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B), and the transfer statute >at 28 U.S.C. 1631. > >Hang on to your hats! > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >http://supremelaw.com > >copy: Supreme Law School ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com -> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail