Time: Thu Sep 04 09:03:09 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA26171;
	Thu, 4 Sep 1997 09:01:49 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 12:01:33 -0400
Originator: heritage-l@gate.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
To: pmitch@primenet.com

>Dear Clients,
>Karl Kleinpaste and I have an update to 
>share with you, at URL:
>  http://pocari-sweat.jprc.com/~karl/govt/lawsuit/
>Go to the latest document in Karl's on-line docket:
>Here is a summary of the argument:
>Mr. Clarke, alleging to be the U.S. Attorney representing
>all named defendants, has not produced credentials.
>1.  He does not occupy the office of United States Attorney;
>2.  As a result of 1, he cannot represent Defendant United States;
>3.  Even if he had proven he lawfully occupies the office
>    of the United States Attorney, said office has never
>    been granted Power of Attorney to represent Defendant IRS,
>    by Act of Congress;
>4.  Similarly, even if he had proven he occupies said office,
>    it has never been granted Power of Attorney to represent
>    private litigants like Defendant Chafin;
>5.  IRS is not a department, bureau, or organization within
>    the United States Department of the Treasury, so the
>    statutes which Clarke has cited, grant no Power of Attorney
>    to the office of United States Attorney to represent IRS.
>Therefore, none of the named defendants, including the
>United States, the Internal Revenue Service, and Mr. Chafin,
>has yet made ANY proper appearances, setting the stage for 
>a default judgment.  
>However, Plaintiff Kleinpaste is now insisting that a
>STAY OF PROCEEDINGS is proper, pending discovery of
>documents requested under the FOIA, or formal admission
>that the requested documents do not, in fact, exist.
>Failure to take the requisite oath of office is grounds
>for ouster via Quo Warranto;  see Gilbertson's OPENING
>BRIEF for a thorough exposition of this legal history.
>Silence also activates estoppel by acquiescence, pursuant
>to Carmine v. Bowen.
>Plaintiff Kleinpaste has now provided the USDC with ample legal 
>justification for permitting a FOIA suit to proceed in the DCUS,
>pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B), and the transfer statute
>at 28 U.S.C. 1631.
>Hang on to your hats!
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>copy:  Supreme Law School

Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail