Time: Thu Sep 04 11:58:16 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04690;
Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:57:28 -0700 (MST)
by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA24852;
Thu, 4 Sep 1997 11:44:28 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1997 11:44:25 -0700
To: "maxdent" <maxdent@rosenet.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Article 3 judges?
Upon receipt of a Certificate of Necessity
from a Circuit Court judge, the Chief Justice
is authorized to fill temporary vacancies
on the DCUS, or any other federal court,
for that matter.
Since Congress has specifically defined the Court
of International Trade to be an Article III court,
in USA v. Wallen we filed a demand that
the C.J. select a candidate from that Court,
for temporary duty on the DCUS in Arizona.
It was at that precise moment that our petition
to the Ninth Circuit for a Writ of Mandamus,
compelling the submission of a Certificate of
Necessity to the Chief Justice, was actively
obstructed by cohorts of M. Elizabeth Broderick,
who was, I believe, working as a "front" woman
for the DOJ property conversion racket being run
out of the federal building in downtown Los Angeles.
One of those cohorts had worked his way into
my living room, where he threatened my life
12 times, the day I informed him of my decision
to testify against M. Elizabeth Broderick --
for stamping her commercial liens with a
rubber stamp which reads: "U S CRIMINAL COURT".
Her Arizona cohort had brazenly given me a
telephone number for this court, in Washington, D.C.,
no less! When I called the number, they answered,
"Hello. Corporation Counsel.
"Department of Justice.
"May I help you?"
All of these documents will soon be loaded into
the Supreme Law Library, where we can all have
a good look at them.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 11:38 AM 9/4/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Mr. Mitchell,
>
> I know you are busy, Please forgive for taking up your time here.
>Question; if there are no true Article 3 Judges to sit in an Article 3
>court, then how does one expect to get into that jurisdiction? Who or what
>has the athority to create an true Article 3 Judge? Could this be the
>stumbling block?
>
> Respectfully
>
> Max Dent
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail