Time: Tue Sep 16 13:43:34 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA11304 for [address in tool bar]; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 13:33:01 -0700 (MST) Delivered-To: liberty-and-justice-outgoing@majordomo.pobox.com Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 13:21:45 -0700 To: Brooks Martin <haze11@prodigy.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: L&J: Proposal for fewer distracions [corrected] Cc: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com Dear Mr. Martin, I must decline your request below, with all due respect, because I have good reason to believe that the recent attacks on our work here, are motivated by a desire to deflect interest in the merits, and in the results, of that research. Your "request" below is one which I would have to put in the same category, particularly after you communicated several false statements to me concerning your intentions to enroll in our school. Yes, I am openly questioning your motives, sir. What you appear to be attempting here is your own ad hominem distraction from the productive direction which this research has taken. Let me give you just one small example. It is clear now, that the U.S. Supreme Court has only been authorized to promulgate rules for the United States District Court, but there is no comparable authority for that court to promulgate rules for the District Court of the United States. This, in and of itself, has enormous implications for the American People's prospects at ever achieving due process of law in the DCUS, particularly when tax and/or monetary questions should arise. The case of USA v. Knudson is the one in which this finding was first documented, to the best of our knowledge. This is not to say that others did not make the same finding, at approximately the same time. Now, if you would prefer to pull these public conversations down to an altitude which is close to the gutter, rather than to deal with the obvious and enormous implications of the merits, please don't let me stop you. Calling them "distractions" suggests to me a great deal about what it is YOU are trying to do. Deal with the merits, man! The First Amendment is alive and well in my country. I suggest that you read it again. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with "unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject) Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail