Time: Sat Sep 20 19:23:47 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA27708;
	Sat, 20 Sep 1997 17:45:51 -0700 (MST)
	id UAA22381; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 20:43:57 -0400 (EDT)
	id UAA22376; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 20:43:54 -0400 (EDT)
	id AA18067; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 20:43:53 -0400
	by comet.connix.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA25944;
	Sat, 20 Sep 1997 20:42:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 20:42:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: RevCOAL <revcoal@connix.com>
To: Henry Ayre <henri@Alaska.NET>
Cc: snetnews@world.std.com
Subject: Re: SNET: Radioactive Material Found In Tulsa


->  SearchNet's   SNETNEWS   Mailing List

On Sat, 20 Sep 1997, Henry Ayre wrote:
>
>Indeed! If the object were a camera it certainly could not use normal film
>since the radiation would immediately fog the film.

Well, presumably that's what the heavy lead shielding protects
against...


>As Donna suggests,
>there is more to this story than is being told. Apparently SOMETHING is
>missing and that something is radioactive. Methinks it may be something
>other than a camera. H. Ayre

Well, it just may well be a camera, but if so, then MEthinks that
whatever's been exposed on that film would be very interesting to take
a gander at....

Then again, maybe it's NOT a camera, which then makes us question just
what WOULD make something so heavily shielded so radioactive...

Then again, maybe it's not really radioactive....maybe 'they' just
want us to think it is....

...but I'm giving myself a headache, and I want to make sure I get my
40 winks tonite....


Donna  ;-)




-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
->  Posted by: RevCOAL <revcoal@connix.com>


      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail