Time: Sat Sep 20 19:24:04 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA09374; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 18:26:20 -0700 (MST) From: SErtelt@aol.com Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 21:08:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <970920205853_-229905111@emout15.mail.aol.com> To: SErtelt@aol.com Subject: CAMPEL-L: White House 2000 update --------------------- Forwarded message: Subj: Re: CAMPEL-L: White House 2000 update Date: 97-09-20 18:10:03 EDT From: DeValera77 To: SErtelt In a message dated 97-09-20 11:38:35 EDT, SErtelt writes: << He sounded like a Republican. Suggested in a liberal way that the income gap was too far apart but suggested expanded tax free IRAs as the way to solve the problem, instead of taxation and redistribution. Gee, anyone want to support Kerry for President? :-> >> Well no, considering how Dole was too "liberal" for me, but I must admit that I do think Kerrey would be about the best candidate the Democrats could field, not only for the country, but for themselves. Kerrey would have a lot of potential appeal among moderate-to-"liberal" suburban Republican types, as well as independents and would probably be a virtually unstopable juggernaut in the general election. The only question is, can a man like Kerrey, who wishes to be be fiscally responsible and do something pro-active to prevent Social Security and Medicare from going bankrupt (such as means testing) actually get through the "liberal" filter of the Democratic Party's presidential primaries? I'm skeptical. Its one thing to pose as a New Democrat while winking at the "liberals" ala Clinton & Gore, its quite another to actually BE a New Democrat. I suspect that the naton may be moving into a phase (albeit probably not as long of one) that is the reverse of what we saw in the post-Truman years, ie. Republicans tend to get the White House and Demos tend to get the Congress. Since I believe my party is liable to lose in 2000 anyway (but virtually assured of holding both houses of Congress until at least 2004), I can't help but wish Kerrey a certain degree of luck.
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail