Time: Mon Sep 29 16:38:32 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA07137
for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 16:38:06 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To: liberty-and-justice-outgoing@majordomo.pobox.com
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 16:33:43 -0700
To: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: L&J: China vs. U.S. - WAR
Since when has a computer made by
Sun Microsystems ever been classed
as a "supercomputer"?
This is news to me, after being
in the computer industry for over
25 years.
I must have overlooked that announcement
in the Federal Register (where all good
news is sure to be published, if you can
stand the wet ink).
Must have been like that ballistic
sewing machine they acquired for
prison slave labor to assemble tennis
shoes, maybe??
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 04:55 PM 9/29/97 +0000, you wrote:
>------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
>Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 13:27:23 -0400
>From: Jackie Patru <104645.452@compuserve.com>
>Subject: China vs. U.S. - WAR
>To: BlindCopyReceiver:;@compuserve.com
>
>In USA TODAY, 9-19-97 (pg 6A) see the headlines of
>two separate articles - same page.
>
>"U.S. MAY SELL NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY TO CHINA"
>Clinton may soon clear the way for sales of U.S.
>nuclear power technology to Bejing.
>
>"WASHINGTON - ANALYST: CHINA'S WORKING ON WAYS
>TO WIN WAR WITH U.S."
>The Chinese military is developing ways to
>overcome America's high-tech weaponry and defeat
>the United States in a future military face-off.
>A pentagon expert on China said he translated
>Chinese military publications which show the
>Communist Chinese are aware of U.S. weaknesses in
>weaponry and believe the U.S. could be defeated
>with the right strategy which involves using NEW
>TECHNOLOGY.
>
>Transcript of both articles follows - fyi.
>===============================================
>USA TODAY - Friday, Sept. 19, 1997
>
>"U.S. may sell nuclear technology to China"
>>From staff and wire reports
>
>WASHINGTON -- China has made "substantial"
>progress in curbing nuclear assistance to Iran and
>Pakistan and that may allow President Clinton to
>soon clear the way for sales of U.S. nuclear power
>technology to Beijing, the [CFR-controlled] State
>Department said Thursday.
>
>A final determination has not been made. But by
>the time he meets with China's leader this fall,
>Clinton may be able to certify that Beijing can be
>sold U.S.-made nuclear power technology under the
>1985 Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation (PNC) agreement,
>State Department spokesman James Runin said.
>
>General Electric, Westinghouse and ABB Combustion
>have lobbied intensively for the certification.
>
>Asked if the administration was ready for this
>step, Rubin said: "I think that we haven't made
>that kind of determination nor to my knowledge
>have we signaled that we intend to make that kind
>of determination.
>
>"However, we have been working on this problem
>very hard and we have seen some signs of
>substantial progress", he said.
>
>Among steps China has recently taken: It agreed
>to return a supercomputer to its U.S.
>manufacturer, Sun Microsystems of California.
>[Right!] The return came after it was revealed
>that the supercomputer, which was supposed to be
>used only for commercial purposes, was being put
>to military uses.
>
> Chinese President Jiang Zemin is to meet
>Clinton in Washington in late October or early
>November -- a specific date has not been announced
>-- for what is expected to be the most important
>Sino-American summit in years.
>
> "The administration needs something
>concrete" for the summit with Jiang, says ex-U.S.
>ambassador to China James Lilley. "They want
>something for the summit that sounds like you're
>making progress."
>
> Secretary of State Madeleine Albright is
>to meet Chinese Foreign Minister Qian Qichen next
>Tuesday in New York, when both will attend the
>opening of the U.N. General Assembly.
>
> Officials say Albright and Qian will
>shape the final agenda for the Clinton-Jiang
>summit. It's expected the two leaders will focus
>on the issues of nuclear nonproliferation, human
>rights and trade when they meet in Washington.
>
> The PNC, signed in 1985, authorizes the
>sale of nuclear reactors, major reactor components
>and low-enriched uranium fuel. But Congress,
>skeptical about China's intentions, mandated that
>a president must certify [that] Chinese exports
>would not assist any non nuclear-weapons-states
>before licenses are issued.
>
> Critics say the administration is rushing
>into certification. Gary Milhollin, director of
>the nonprofit, nonpartisan Wisconsin Project on
>Nuclear Arms Control, told Congress Thursday that
>China's promises to curb its nuclear-related
>exports amount to little more than a meaningless
>"mantra."
>
> "Today China's exports are the most
>serious proliferation threat in the world," he
>said. "Since 1980 China has supplied billions of
>dollars' worth of nuclear weapon, chemical weapon
>and missile technology to South Asia, South
>Africa, South America and the Middle East. It has
>done so in the teeth of U.S. protests and despite
>repeated promises to stop. The exports are still
>going on." [end of article]
>
>>From the same paper - USA TODAY - on the same day
>on the very same page we read:
>
>"WASHINGTON - Analyst: China's working on ways
>to win war with U.S.
>
> The Chinese military is developing ways
>to overcome America's high-tech weaponry and
>defeat the United States in a future military
>face-off, a Pentagon analyst told the Senate
>Select Committee on Intelligence Thursday.
>
> Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-
>Ala., said China poses the greatest intelligence
>challenge to the United States because "as an
>emerging economic and military power, China has
>the option -- and, increasingly, the will -- to
>challenge vital U.S. interests around the globe."
>
> But the harshest assessment came from
>Michael Pillsbury, an expert on China at the
>Pentagon's National Defense University. He said
>his translations of Chinese military publications
>show remarkably accurate descriptions of
>weaknesses in U.S. weapons. A common theme,
>Pillbury said, is a Chinese military view that
>America is "a declining power with but two or
>three decades of primacy left." He said they
>believe that "U.S. military forces, while
>dangerous at present, are vulnerable, even deeply
>flawed and can be defeated with the right
>strategy." That strategy involves using new
>technology to "defeat the superior with the
>inferior", he said. [end of article]
>==============================================
>submitted by: Jackie Patru
>CDR [Council on Domestic Relations]
>104645.452@compuserve.com
> http://www.logoplex.com/shops/cdr/cdr.html
> --------------------------------------
>Radio Program "Sweet Liberty" 6-7 (eastern) Mon - Thurs.
>Shortwave 9.475 - Satellite G-7, 14 Audio 7.71
> ---------------------------------
>"WE ARE APT TO SHUT OUR EYES AGAINST A PAINFUL TRUTH...
>FOR MY PART, I AM WILLING TO KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH;
>TO KNOW THE WORST; AND TO PROVIDE FOR IT." Patrick Henry
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
:
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
_____________________________________:
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail