Time: Wed Oct 01 12:49:12 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA00967; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 12:49:31 -0700 (MST) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA10248; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 12:43:18 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 12:42:48 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: "A year in the life of the IRS" (fwd) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >>Wednesday, October 1, 1997 >> >>A year in the life of the IRS >> >>A year ago this month, I broke the story of the Internal Revenue >>Service’s striking pattern of auditing individuals and organizations >>politically troublesome to the Clinton administration. The article, >>published in the Wall Street Journal, revealed the way my own >>organization, the Western Journalism Center, was harassed and abused by >>the agency and listed some of the other groups targeted. >> >>I knew it was a big story the day it hit. But, only a year later, after >>several congressional investigations, the resignation of IRS >>Commissioner Margaret Milner Richardson, the closing of the case against >>the center, a “60 Minutes” expose and a media and political pile-on >>against the agency, is it becoming clear just how big it was. It could >>well represent the first nail in the coffin of the IRS. >> >>A year ago, the Heritage Foundation, National Rifle Association, >>Concerned Women of America and Oliver North’s organization were all >>still fighting their own individual battles with the IRS. Not one of >>those groups would confirm for me, on the record, that they were even >>being audited. Nonetheless, I was able to corroborate that they were and >>that other conservative organizations, such as Christian Coalition and >>the American Family Association were having their own difficulties. >> >>I also pointed out that, nearly two years earlier, my center was the >>only news organization targeted in a White House Counsel’s Office memo >>on how to deal with administration scandals. I explained that the IRS >>seemed less concerned with our bookkeeping procedures and fund-raising >>techniques than with the focus of our investigative reporting work. I >>also related the experience of one of our major donors who was told by >>then-Cabinet Secretary Hazel O’Leary, now under investigation herself, >>that if he gave any more money to the Western Journalism Center his >>federal contracts would be in jeopardy. >> >>Only a month later, the White House’s long-time preoccupation with the >>center became even clearer with the disclosure, again by the Journal, of >>the administration’s 331-page “Communication Stream of Conspiracy >>Commerce” report, which placed my group at the beginning of what it >>called a “media food chain” that nourished scandal stories beginning to >>appear in the establishment press. The report, regarded widely >>throughout the media as “Clinton’s enemies list,” contained a five-page >>biography of me -- the only journalist in the country so targeted In >>January, I announced that the center would turn the tables on the IRS -- >>that we would begin investigating them. We began reporting taxpayer >>horror stories. Five months later, the IRS closed the books on our case >>and opened an internal investigation of its own field agent. >> >>By February, Richardson was calling it quits. By March, the Joint >>Committee on Taxation was announcing an investigation into the >>“political audits.” >> >>I always believed that our case represented a “smoking gun” connecting >>the White House with the use and abuse of the IRS. I was told as much by >>congressional staffers investigating the matter, as well. >> >>But Congress, as it so often does, dropped the ball. No testimony was >>ever taken by the joint committee. No witnesses were ever deposed. No >>documents were ever subpoenaed. In other words, the White House was let >>off the hook. >> >>Had Ronald Reagan or Richard Nixon been in the White House, impeachment >>proceedings would be over by now. After all, using the IRS as a >>political attack dog is one of the ultimate forms of presidential abuse >>of power. Even Nixon never succeeded at it -- though he tried. >> >>Look at what has happened since Congress fumbled in its oversight >>responsibility: >> >>We now know of at least 20 non-profit organizations unfriendly to the >>Clinton administration that have been victims of IRS scrutiny. Former >>White House travel director Billy Dale was audited shortly after being >>fired at the urging of Hillary Clinton. Patricia Mendoza was audited >>within a month of yelling, “You suck!” at Clinton during a campaign stop >>in 1996. Kent Masterson Brown was targeted for an audit within a month >>of suing to open Mrs. Clinton’s secret health care task force to public >>scrutiny. >> >>But the piece de resistance came just last month when homemaker Paula >>Jones announced she had received an audit notice days after rejecting a >>settlement of her sexual harassment suit against the president. However, >>I don’t blame Bill Clinton alone for Mrs. Jones’ audit. It was literally >>invited by congressional inaction over the previous 12 months. >> >>Is it even conceivable that the IRS and White House would have taken >>such a political risk if Congress had shown some backbone and >>investigated the pattern six months earlier? I don’t think so. And if >>Congress doesn’t get serious about investigating these abuses now, they >>will only become more routine, more blatant and more chilling in the >>future. >> >>Congress needs to stop its IRS show trials that result in the suspension >>of mid-level managers and start exposing and attacking the root problem >>-- a problem which continues to reside in taxpayer-supported comfort at >>1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. >> >>Joseph Farah is Editor of the internet newspaper WorldNetDaily.com and >>Executive Director of the Western Journalism Center, an independent >>group of investigative reporters. >> >> Send e-mail to Joseph Farah . >> >> ©1997, Western Journalism Center > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine : tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this _____________________________________: As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail