Time: Wed Oct 01 16:43:45 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA14527;
Wed, 1 Oct 1997 16:43:24 -0700 (MST)
by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA16487;
Wed, 1 Oct 1997 16:28:55 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 16:28:25 -0700
To: <Pattisons@worldnet.att.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: USPS Publication #221
Dear Steve,
Get yourself a copy of USPS Publication #221,
and read the paragraphs dealing with foreign
addresses [sic]. Your mailing location below
is expressed as follows, using the format
suggested by Publication #221:
Steven Pattison
10911 Reeder
Overland Park XXXXX [or XXXXX-XXXX]
KANSAS STATE
where,
XXXXX = your 5-digit Postal Zone
XXXXX-XXXX = your 9-digit Postal Zone
KANSAS STATE = your Union state in ALL CAPS
We have modified this recommended format
a little bit, to read as follows:
Steven Pattison, Sui Juris
c/o general delivery at:
10911 Reeder [Street/Avenue/Boulevard/etc.]
Overland Park XXXXX/tdc [or XXXXX-XXXX/tdc]
KANSAS STATE
where,
tdc = threat, duress and coercion
XXXXX-XXX = standard 9-digit Postal Zone
Details about "tdc" are available upon request.
If you could make a small donation to our library
fund, we could load all pertinent documentation
into the Supreme Law Library at URL:
http://supremelaw.com
We are trying to encourage litigation concerning
the historical meaning of "general delivery,"
as distinguished from "curb-side" delivery,
by appearing to "mix" the two, deliberately.
If this "error" should be pointed out to us,
in a court room, then we will litigate that
point, and get declaratory relief as to the
proper method of receiving first class mail,
if one is a Citizen of ONE OF the United States
of America who is NOT also a citizen of the
United States (read "federal citizen").
The currently active hypothesis is that curb-side
delivery is an extra "free service" which you can
accept, above and beyond delivery of your mail to
the nearest post office. Delivery to the nearest
post office has historically been defined as
"general delivery" [sic]. But, if you accept this
"free service", then you become subject to
federal municipal law, because the USPS is now
a municipal corporation.
I hope this helps.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
At 06:09 PM 10/1/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Senators,
>
>My name is Steven Pattison. I inhabit one of the several states by the
>name of Kansas. I would want an answer to the following question in
>writing and also by e-mail.
>
>My e-mail address is -- <Pattisons@worldnet.att.net>
>My mailing address is -- Steven Pattison
> C/O United States Post Office
> 10911 Reeder
> Overland Park, Kansas, zip code exempt.
>
>My phone number is -- (913) 491-0320.
>
> The only reason that I am only asking one question at a time, is because
>when I have asked more than one in the past, the IRS or my Congressperson
>did not answer any questions.
>
> Here is the second question.
>
> A hearing was held, before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Ways and
>Means, House of Representatives in the Eighty-third Congress, in the first
>session on Administration of the Internal Revenue Laws. It was held
>between February 3, 1958 and February 13, 1958. A Dwight E. Avis testified
>under oath and he was the head of Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division, Bureau
>of Internal Revenue. The congressional records printed the following:
>
> Mr. Curtis. An alcohol tax matter that would go to the Appeals Section
>---------
>
> Mr. Avis. There is just no such thing. That is where this structure
>differs. Let me point this out now: Your income tax is 100 percent
>voluntary tax, and your liquor tax is 100 percent enforced tax. Now, the
>situation is as different as day and night. Consequently, your same rules
>just will not apply, and therefore the alcohol and tobacco tax has been
>handled here in this reorganization a little differently, because of the
>very nature of it, then the rest of the over-all tax problem.
>
> What part of "Your income tax is 100 percent voluntary tax" do you not
>understand?
>
> To understand this term "voluntary compliance", separate the two words in
>time. The voluntary act always precedes the requirement of compliance.
>
> To volunteer means just that. It is the act of self-assessment. The law
>does not and cannot mandate self-assessment. In other words, there is no
>requirement to volunteer wages as income.
>
> I have more question.
>
> I have been a series 7 license Stock Broker, Estate Tax Planner and
>Financial Planner for over 25 years until I got the Gulf War Illness (GWI).
> Everyone needs to get a copy of the LA Times, March 9, 1997. It says that
>the GWI is contagious.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>/S/ Steven Pattison.
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine 02
:
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail