Time: Wed Aug 13 12:36:28 1997 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:35:24 -0700 To: <hawknest@microweb.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar] Subject: Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO, Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. Cc: [address in toolbar] [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson [zip code exempt] ARIZONA REPUBLIC August 10, 1997 Mr. John Oppedahl Publisher and CEO "The Arizona Republic" c/o P.O. Box 1950 Phoenix 85001/tdc ARIZONA REPUBLIC Subject: Letter from Frank G. Long, dated August 8, 1997 Dear Mr. Oppedahl: I have received, but not accepted, a letter from Mr. Frank G. Long, claiming that Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. ("PNI") has instructed him to take legal action against Me, to obtain a court order to stop what he alleges to be "unauthorized and infringing use of ARIZONA REPUBLIC". With that letter, he also enclosed a copy of a document which he described as "a copy of complaint that will be filed in U.S. District Court of Arizona and served" upon Me, unless I deliver to his office by 12:00 noon, Friday, August 15, 1997, a letter advising PNI that I will: (1) immediately cease using ARIZONA REPUBLIC on correspondence or on the Internet in connection with any publications or related services; (2) refrain from using ARIZONA REPUBLIC in that manner in the future; (3) sign an agreement confirming My acceptance of these demands. Mr. Oppedahl, I have very good reasons to believe that Mr. Long is either entirely ignorant of many important material facts, or he has deliberately chosen to withhold many important material facts from you, which you need to know immediately. In an effort to persuade you to reconsider the action which Mr. Long has threatened in writing to take, I offer the following for your careful consideration, review, and verification: 1. Mr. Long refers in his letter to correspondence which I have been sending to the Pima County Attorney's office. It is true that I have been sending first class U.S. Mail to the Pima County Attorney's office. However, this mail is of a very confidential and sensitive nature, because it concerns several cases which are currently underway in state and federal courts, here in Tucson and also in Phoenix. I can only speculate at this point in time, how it was that Mr. Long obtained access to this correspondence and its contents. You need to ask him yourself, how it was that he did so. If and when you obtain an answer from him, would you please do Me the courtesy of relating his answer to Me? I would very much appreciate that. Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 1 of 7 For your information, I have requested the Pima County Jury Commissioner to provide Me with an opportunity to testify to the currently convened grand jury in Pima County, concerning the material evidence I now have of probable cause for charging several government employees and private individuals in Arizona with numerous violations of federal and state criminal codes. These cases, which have thoroughly documented the material evidence to which I refer, are the following: In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center Company, United States District Court, Tucson, case number #GJ-95-1-6 Mitchell v. Nordbrock, Pima County Consolidated Justice Court, Tucson, case number #CV-97-3438 People ex rel. Mitchell v. Pima County Consolidated Justice Court, Superior Court of Arizona State, Tucson, case number #320831 Swan Business Organization v. Ulan et al., Superior Court of the State of Arizona, Tucson, case number #315580 In Re Eugene A. and Linda H. Burns, United States Bankruptcy Court, Tucson, case number #96-01624-TUC-LO In Re New Life Health Center Company, United States Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix, case number #93-06051-PHX-GBN In Re J. Fife Symington III, United States Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix, case number #95-08397-PHX-GBN U.S.A. v. Wallen, United States District Court, Tucson, case number #95-484-WDB I have listed the above cases in part because you have ready access to the docket files here in Arizona (Tucson and Phoenix). There are a number of additional cases which I could cite here, but their files are all in the custody of court clerks who are located in other states of the Union. Notably, the grand jury civil case #GJ-95-1-6 and the Wallen criminal case #95-484-WDB, have resulted in formal Complaints of Judicial Misconduct being filed with the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, California. I would fully expect that the latter Clerk will give you access to the docket files for those two Judicial Misconduct Complaints, upon proper request for same. Now, with these specific cases as a factual and legal foundation for what I am about to tell you, I am extremely alarmed that Mr. Long has admitted, in writing which he transmitted to Me via Certified United States Mail, that he is already aware of correspondence which I have been sending to the Pima County Attorney's Office. For your information, I have had direct written contact with Mr. David R. White, Chief Criminal Deputy, and Ms. Carolyn Emerine, Program Director. Because she is the head of that entire government unit, I would fully expect that Ms. Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney, is also aware of the Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 2 of 7 several written materials which I have already forwarded to Mr. White and to Ms. Emerine. Please contact the latter individuals on your own, as soon as possible, to confirm what I am telling you here. But, please read the rest of this letter first, okay? Without knowing any more about Mr. Long's method(s) of obtaining access to the information which I have supplied to the Pima County Attorney's office, I would have to say that his letter contains enough incriminating admissions to constitute sufficient and probable cause for Me to charge him with aiding and abetting a serious criminal conspiracy. It is evident to Me that the Pima County Attorney's office is taking affirmative steps to delay and/or prevent certain essential investigations from proceeding into the material evidence which I have assembled and cited above. The criminal violations to which I have been an eyewitness, and the evidence of which I have already verified under penalty of perjury, constitute proof of the following criminal activities: (1) deprivations of fundamental Rights, under color of law, including, but not limited to systematic violations of voting Rights, and jury selection policies; (2) conspiracy to deprive the fundamental Rights of Citizens of Arizona; (3) obstruction of correspondence transmitted through United States Mail to a federal grand jury; (4) perjury before a United States District Court and before a federal grand jury; (5) tampering with a federal grand jury; (6) obstruction of justice in proceedings before a United States District Court and before a federal grand jury; (7) conspiracy to commit obstruction of correspondence, jury tampering, obstruction of justice, perjury, barratry, extortion, and mail fraud; (8) placing false and misrepresentative statements in pleadings filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court; (9) threatening a known federal witness, and retaliating against a known federal witness; (10) racketeering and child kidnapping across state lines, and conspiracy to commit both across state lines; (11) fraud, bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud on an Arizona pure trust, and upon the officers of an Arizona pure trust; (12) theft of professional services, wrongful termination, contempt of court, libel, defamation, grand theft, and aiding and abetting one or more of the above. Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 3 of 7 In support of evidence establishing probable cause for charging certain individuals, both in and out of government, with the criminal activities itemized above, I have enclosed, for your careful review and study, several documents which have already been filed in the cases cited above. I encourage you to confirm that these documents have, in fact, been filed, served, and docketed in their respective cases. 2. In his letter, Mr. Long refers to a complaint that will be filed in U.S. District Court in Arizona, unless I yield to his demands [sic]. The so-called COMPLAINT [sic] Mr. Long enclosed with his letter, in and of itself constitutes further probable cause for Me to believe that Mr. Long may already be conspiring with the very same individuals who are active suspects in one or more of the criminal activities itemized above. I refer specifically to Richard H. Weare, Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Arizona. Please note the active role which Mr. Weare has, evidently, taken in the conspiracy: to obstruct correspondence, to tamper with a federal grand jury, and to obstruct justice in proceedings before the U.S. District Court in Tucson last year, in #GJ-95-1-6. See the enclosed letter to the FBI in Tucson, in particular. To My knowledge, this conspiracy continues right up to the present time; I know this, because the Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit has failed to act on either of the Complaints of Judicial Misconduct which I have filed against two (2) federal judges in Tucson. Mr. Long's draft COMPLAINT is first described by Mr. Long as a complaint that will be filed [sic], but that very COMPLAINT already bears civil case number #CIV-97-0025-PHX-EHC. In other words, it has already been filed in the office of Mr. Richard H. Weare, and a federal judge has already been assigned. Therefore, that proceeding has already commenced, but Mr. Long misleads Me into thinking that he has not yet filed it, and that it has not yet commenced. What is the truth here, Mr. Oppedahl? This misrepresentation is probable cause to charge Mr. Long with transmitting fraudulent and/or deliberately misleading statements via United States Mail; this is also a federal offense. There are a number of other misleading and misrepresentative statements which Mr. Long has already written in his so-called COMPLAINT. If you do not already have a copy of this so-called COMPLAINT, I do encourage you to get a true and correct version of the one which must already have been filed in the office of Mr. Richard H. Weare, in order for it to bear a valid and currently active case number. I do feel that it is My moral obligation to inform you that Mr. Long is proceeding on the basis of certain assumptions, and presumptions, that are demonstrably false and which completely eclipse any integrity his allegations might otherwise have had. In particular, if he is deluding himself into believing that I am "profiting" from My activism as a writer, investigator, Counselor at Law, and federal witness, he is tragically and demonstrably mistaken. I will now summarize the real losses I have sustained. Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 4 of 7 When I worked for Elizabeth Broderick on her civil and criminal cases in Los Angeles, she stiffed Me for over $10,000 in legal services, and loaned Me a car with tampered front brakes. When I worked for LeRoy Schweitzer and his nineteen (19) other co-defendants in Billings, Montana, he and his associates there stiffed Me for over $10,000 in legal services, and then proceeded to delay and tamper with numerous pieces of legal mail which were directed to Me, care of their post office box. When I worked for Sheila Wallen in her criminal case in Tucson, she stiffed Me for over $3,000 in legal services; her brother David Wallen aided and abetted Herb Crawford in an act of grand theft against My private property. When I worked for the New Life Health Center ("New Life") in Tucson, the General Manager stiffed Me for over $2,000 in legal services, and damaged Me in a host of other ways which are already well documented, and which remain undenied. When Herb Crawford vacated My apartment very suddenly, because I demanded that he do so, he took with him over $1,200 worth of cash and office equipment, this after threatening Me twelve (12) times when he already knew very well that I am a federal witness. After Crawford threatened My life, and this after I provided him with shelter which he told Me he needed desperately, I did not think it was wise to keep any money around My house. I entrusted the New Life accountant with $3,000 of My own money, and that accountant, Mr. Neil T. Nordbrock, then proceeded to embezzle every last penny of this money, leaving Me destitute and without essential medical services. Do you have an adding machine? Mr. Oppedahl, if you do know the secret of squeezing blood from a turnip, would you please let Me in on this valuable secret? 3. In his so-called COMPLAINT, Mr. Long expresses his desire to persuade a federal court to order an accounting by Me of all "profits derived from the providing of services through the unauthorized use of ARIZONA REPUBLIC" [sic]. Mr. Oppedahl, this statement by Mr. Long makes it very clear to Me that he, and his unnamed accessories, have much more in mind than some trivial changes in the way I have chosen to label envelopes which I transmit through the mail. This statement expresses his intention to bring down upon Me the criminal force and undue influence of the very same conspiracy which I have already identified and documented within the United States District Court, here in Tucson, in Phoenix, and in other cities across this nation. Do you want to be the one who was responsible for authorizing such conduct by Mr. Long? Would you please do Me the courtesy of an honest answer to this question? If you are still a bit confused by any of the points which I have already made in this letter, please find a way to locate and read the essay entitled "Karma and the Federal Courts" in the Supreme Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 5 of 7 Law Library at http://www.supremelaw.com. The United States District Court ("USDC") is a territorial court, identical to the "territorial courts of the United States" which are mentioned in 15 U.S.C. 1121 -- one of the statues cited by Mr. Long in his so-called COMPLAINT; this is the court he intends to petition. Arizona is not a territory; it is a Union state, a REPUBLIC, a star on the flag, under the Guarantee Clause. If the attorney whom your corporation has hired does not yet understand this all- important distinction, then you and your corporation may be in very deep trouble, much deeper trouble than you ever imagined possible. I am saying this with all honesty, and with great and sincere earnest, because the conspiracy which I have identified needs to be contained, not enlarged. I am not referring here to some grand or vague international oligarchy; I am referring to the statutory definition of "conspiracy" which Congress has legislated at 18 U.S.C. 241. Even if you did not know anything about it before now, your willingness to aid and abet this criminal racket would still make you and your corporation liable as accessories after the fact; all the more so, do you now run the very serious and real risk of criminal complicity, because of the many statements of material fact which I am sharing with you here, all of which can, and should, be independently verified by you before authorizing Mr. Long to proceed as planned. In conclusion, Mr. Oppedahl, please carefully and deliberately reconsider the actions which Mr. Long is threatening to take against Me, as described in his recent letter and in the accompanying COMPLAINT which he has not only drafted, but also filed in the USDC in Phoenix, Arizona. I should think that, after reading and verifying all of the statements which I have carefully prepared for your confidential review here, you would at least give Me the benefits of the doubt and of a private hearing in your office, hopefully in front of witnesses (veteran reporters perhaps?) and with a good tape recorder going, to commemorate My verbal confirmations to you, in Person. I do honestly think that Mr. Long is proposing a course of action which could very well result in serious damages to your good name and reputation, and to the good name and reputation of your excellent newspaper, that are far beyond anything which you can presently anticipate with any degree of accuracy. I say this, because of the mountains of litigation in which I have already been involved since I began this work in 1990. The cases which I have cited for you above, are only a sample of the overall story which I have already documented, to the very best of My mental and physical abilities. The fact that I am still alive today should be an indication to you that I am getting help, but it is not the kind of help which comes from a terrestrial source. Let us now stop to pray and ponder the best course of action for you, for your company, for your newspaper, for Arizona, and for the entire nation. I can guarantee to you this much: if you will humble yourself before the Most High and ask for His special guidance, you will receive it with unfailing reliability and strength. You have that on My word, because it is His Word which I am conveying to you. On His Word you can always rely. Always. Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 6 of 7 Thank you very much for your careful and considerate attention. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Mitchell Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law, federal witness, Citizen of Arizona state, and private attorney general copy: Hon. William L. Scholl, attorney in private practice Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals James A. Crawford, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Tucson Division Commander, security and investigations Officer Jack McLamb, Phoenix Police Department (Ret.) Postmaster, USPS, Coronado Station, Tucson Postmaster, USPS, Downtown Station, Tucson anonymous colleagues enclosures Confidential Letter to John Oppedahl, CEO: Page 7 of 7 # # # ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail