Time: Tue Sep 16 15:10:36 1997
by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA18059;
Tue, 16 Sep 1997 13:14:12 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 13:14:00 -0700
To: Brooks Martin <haze11@prodigy.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Proposal for fewer distracions
Cc: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com
References: <3.0.3.16.19970916102930.3bcf7d48@pop.primenet.com>
Dear Mr. Martin,
I must decline your request below,
with all due respect, because I have
good reason to believe that the recent
attacks on our work here, are motivated
by a desire to deflect interest in
the merits, and in the results, of that
research.
Your "request" below is one which I would
have to put in the same category, particularly
after you communicated several false statements
to me concerning your intentions to enroll in
our school.
Yes, I am openly questioning your motives, sir.
What are appear to be attempting here is another
your own ad hominem distraction from the productive
direction which this research has taken.
Let me give you just one small example.
It is clear now, that the U.S. Supreme Court
has only been authorized to promulgate rules
for the United States District Court, but
there is no comparable authority for that
court to promulgate rules for the District
Court of the United States. This, in and
of itself, has enormous implications for
the American People's prospects at ever
achieving due process of law in the DCUS,
particularly when tax and/or monetary questions
should arise. The case of USA v. Knudson is
the one in which this finding was first documented,
to the best of our knowledge. This is not to say
that others did not make the same finding, at
approximately the same time.
Now, if you would prefer to pull these public
conversations down to an altitude which
is close to the gutter, rather than to deal
with the obvious and enormous implications of
the merits, please don't let me stop you.
Calling them "distractions" suggests to me a great
deal about what it is YOU are trying to do.
Deal with the merits, man!
The First Amendment is alive and well in my
country. I suggest that you read it again.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 02:00 PM 9/16/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>
>> TO: Lizy
>>
>> When all of the evidence is loaded into
>> the Supreme Law Library, that evidence
>> will speak for itself. We won't need
>> your ad hominems to distract or mislead
>> other people.
>>
>> Please learn quickly that ad hominem
>> argumentation is considered a low form
>> of persuasion.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://supremelaw.com
>>
>> p.s. Did you read the pleadings you are criticizing here?
>> Are you capable of answering this question honestly?
>>
>> At 12:59 PM 9/16/97 EDT, you wrote:
>> >In a message dated 97-09-15 15:42:01 EDT, pmitch wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>> Dear Clients, Friends, and Colleagues:
>> >
>> > We are very happy, and proud, to announce that
>> > the key pleadings in U.S.A. v. Knudson are now
>> > loaded into the Supreme Law Library, at the URL
>> > just below my name here.
>> >
>> > On the expectation that this case would be
>> > obstructed, like so many others on which I have
>> > worked during the past 18 months, I decided
>> > literally to inundate the client, and the Department
>> > of Justice, with a tidal wave of evidence, just
>> > to see what they would do with such a wave,
>> > if anything.
>> >
>> > What the client did with all of this, is just
>> > too embarassing (I believe) to relate in detail.
>> > Suffice it to say, that he had too much to drink
>> > (again) on the day all this paperwork arrived.
>> > I don't believe he ever got around to signing and
>> > mailing the FOIA requests, after 5 separate attempts
>> > on my part to explain it all to him. At that point,
>> > I gave up. >>
>> >
>> >
>> >Well! Well! Well! Another of your clients gets his paperwork
messed up!
>> >And his case was obstructed, too! Imagine that!
>> >
>> >Talk about bad luck .....
>> >
>> >Lizy
>> >
>
>Then Paul Mitchell wrote:Dear Ms. Thompson:
>
>I am politely demanding your mailing address --
>for service of due process. If I don't get it
>from you, which is your obligation under the law,
>if you are truly an officer of the courts in
>which you practice, then I will get it from
>another source. By this, I mean to tell you
>that you can expect to be served, by me.
>
>I will now give you a choice between ten rounds,
>or fifteen rounds. It's your choice.
>
>Your move.
>
>Thank you, and good day.
>
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>http://supremelaw.com
>
>copy: The Internet
>
>p.s. Take a hint, Linda, and read the
>etymology of "attorn". I wouldn't be
>caught dead with that term after my name.
>You should know this by now. Ignorance
>of the law is no excuse, remember?
>
>
>
>At 11:29 AM 9/15/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>Blow it out your ear. I am not wasting time responding to you. Any
>future
>>messages from you will be filtered and I won't even see them.
>>
>>Tah-tah.
>>
>>
>>>Dear Madame,
>>>
>>>You have made a very serious accusation here,
>>>Ms. Thompson. I demand to know exactly what
>>>lie you think I told, and I demand it from
>>>you in 72 hours. Your response will be
>>>broadcasted widely on the Internet. If I
>>>do not hear from you in 72 hours, you can
>>>and should expect appropriate action from me.
>>>
>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>http://supremelaw.com
>>>
>>>copy: Supreme Law School and others
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>AEN is for reporters of news and we expend a great deal of effort to cull
>>>out propagandists and liars.
>>>
>>>You are not welcome in AEN news.
>>>
>>>Kind regards,
>>>
>>>Linda Thompson
>>>Dr. Linda Thompson
>>>Attorney at Law
>>>Chairman, American Justice Federation
>>>Internet: lindat@snowhill.com
>>>****************************************************************
>>> Remember Waco.
>>> The Murderers are still free
>>> (and running YOUR country).
>>>
>>>****************************************************************
>>> See brutal mass-murder scene, graphic details:
>>> http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum
>>>
>>>*****************************************************************
>>>Prepping for a new Waco, see FDIC siege against the
>>>Sweeneys at: http://www.qui-tam.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Kind regards,
>>
>>Linda Thompson
>>Dr. Linda Thompson
>>Attorney at Law
>>Chairman, American Justice Federation
>>Internet: lindat@snowhill.com
>>****************************************************************
>> Remember Waco.
>> The Murderers are still free
>> (and running YOUR country).
>>
>>****************************************************************
>> See brutal mass-murder scene, graphic details:
>> http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum
>>
>>*****************************************************************
>>Prepping for a new Waco, see FDIC siege against the
>>Sweeneys at: http://www.qui-tam.com
>>
>>
>>
>>Kind regards,
>>
>>Linda Thompson
>>Dr. Linda Thompson
>>Attorney at Law
>>Chairman, American Justice Federation
>>Internet: lindat@snowhill.com
>
>
>Paul,
>
>Who is Lizy? In reference to your above statement about us not
>needing ad hominems to distract or mislead us, I agree.
>So, if you quit cross-posting messages like Lizy's, and the one
>to Linda Thompson, to this list we could cut certainly keep the
>distractions to a minimum. Last time I checked (which was 2 minutes
>ago) neither Lizy or Linda Thompson post to this list.
>
>Please, spare us the pissing contests. I wouldn't even know about any
>challenges to your self-worth if you didn't post them to this list.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Brooks Martin
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>"Money only appeals to selfishness and irresistibly
>invites abuse. Can anyone imagine Moses, Jesus, or
>Gandhi armed with the money-bags of Carnegie?"
> -Albert Einstein 1934-
>---------------------------------------------------
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail