Time: Thu Aug 21 07:47:25 1997
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 07:44:38 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: SLF: Criminal Complaint in Grand Jury case

[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
c/o general delivery at:
2509 North Campbell Ave., #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
without prejudice




                        JUDICIAL COUNCIL

                      FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT


In re Charge of                 )  No. 96-80380
                                )
Judicial Misconduct             )  NOTICE AND DEMAND
                                )  TO APPEAR BEFORE A
                                )  COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED
                                )  FEDERAL GRAND JURY;
                                )  VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT;
                                )  NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSE:
                                )
                                )  18 U.S.C. 4, 1504, 1512, 1513;
________________________________)  Petition & Due Process Clauses

COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui  Juris, Citizen  of Arizona

state, federal  witness  (hereinafter  "Complainant"),  and  Vice

President for Legal Affairs of New Life Health Center Company, an

Unincorporated Business  Trust domiciled  in the Arizona Republic

(hereinafter the  "Trust"), formally  to demand an opportunity to

appear before  a competent  and  qualified  federal  grand  jury,

pursuant to the second paragraph of 18 U.S.C. 1504;  to bring and

file a  verified CRIMINAL COMPLAINT in the matter of the judicial

misconduct which  is the  subject of the instant case;  to refuse

the ORDER  AND MEMORANDUM  for fraud by Mr. Procter Hug, as filed

in the  instant case  on August  14, 1997,  which ORDER allegedly

dismissed the  instant Complaint  of Judicial Misconduct;  and to

provide formal Notice of the above to all interested party(s).


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 1 of 9


                    DEMAND TO APPEAR BEFORE A
           COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED FEDERAL GRAND JURY

     Complainant hereby demands an opportunity to appear before a

competent and  qualified federal  grand jury,  lawfully  convened

under auspices  of the  United States  Court of  Appeals for  the

Ninth Circuit,  to provide sworn testimony concerning the events,

alleged misconduct, and voluminous supporting documentation which

have given  rise to  the instant  Complaint.  Complainant demands

that said opportunity be created, and that said appearance occur,

no later  than November  30, 1997.   The  instant DEMAND  is made

pursuant to the second paragraph in 18 U.S.C. 1504, to wit:

     Nothing in  this section  shall be construed to prohibit the
     communication of a request to appear before the grand jury.

                                            [bold emphasis added]

     Complainant constructs said paragraph to mean that employees

of all  branches of  the United  States (federal  government) are

barred from  obstructing such a request, delaying such a request,

or otherwise  preventing a  request to  appear before the federal

grand jury from reaching the foreperson of the federal grand jury

via first class, certified, and/or registered United States Mail.

     Complainant offers  to prove  that  there  are  no  statutes

codified anywhere in the United States Code, or otherwise enacted

by the  Congress, which  authorize federal  judges, United States

Attorneys, and/or  clerks of  the  federal  district  courts,  to

delay,  obstruct,   or  otherwise   prevent   the   delivery   of

correspondence  transmitted   via  United   States  Mail  to  the

foreperson of  a lawfully  convened grand jury, particularly when

said correspondence  contains a  lawful, and  proper, request  to

appear before  same and  is transmitted  with return  receipt and

restricted delivery services requested and purchased.


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 2 of 9


                   VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

     Complainant hereby  formally  charges  the  following  named

individuals, both  jointly and  severally, with the corresponding

crimes enumerated infra:


Mr. John M. Roll with:

(1)  obstructing  correspondence  transmitted  via  first  class,
     certified, and registered United States Mail, under color of
     law (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1702;

(2)  tampering  with   a  federal  grand  jury  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512;

(3)  obstruction  of  criminal  investigations  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 1510;

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,
     specifically the  Right to Petition a federal grand jury for
     a formal  investigation (25  counts),  in  violation  of  18
     U.S.C. 242;

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of  the  above  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371;

(6)  perjury before  a judicial  proceeding in  the United States
     District Court (2 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623.


Mr. Robert L. Miskell with:

(1)  obstructing  correspondence  transmitted  via  first  class,
     certified, and registered United States Mail, under color of
     law (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1702;

(2)  tampering  with   a  federal  grand  jury  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512;

(3)  obstruction  of  criminal  investigations  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 1510;

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,
     specifically the  Right to Petition a federal grand jury for
     a formal  investigation (25  counts),  in  violation  of  18
     U.S.C. 242;

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of  the  above  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371;

(6)  perjury before  a judicial  proceeding in  the United States
     District Court (2 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623;

(7)  contempt of  a United States District Court in the matter of
     enforcing a  federal grand  jury  subpoena  (2  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 402.


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 3 of 9


Ms. Janet Napolitano with:

(1)  aiding  and   abetting  the  obstruction  of  correspondence
     transmitted  via  first  class,  certified,  and  registered
     United States  Mail, under  color of  law  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702;

(2)  aiding and  abetting the  act of  tampering with  a  federal
     grand jury  (25 counts),  in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2  and
     1512;

(3)  aiding and  abetting obstruction  of criminal investigations
     (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510;

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,
     specifically the  Right  to  Petition  a  lawfully  convened
     federal grand  jury for  a formal investigation (25 counts),
     in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242;

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of  the  above  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371.


Mr. Richard H. Weare with:

(1)  aiding  and   abetting  the  obstruction  of  correspondence
     transmitted  via  first  class,  certified,  and  registered
     United States  Mail, under  color of  law  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702;

(2)  aiding and  abetting the  act of  tampering with  a  federal
     grand jury  (25 counts),  in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2  and
     1512;

(3)  aiding and  abetting obstruction  of criminal investigations
     (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510;

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,
     specifically the  Right  to  Petition  a  lawfully  convened
     federal grand  jury for  a formal investigation (25 counts),
     in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242;

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of  the  above  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371.


Ms. Evangelina Cardenas with:

(1)  aiding  and   abetting  the  obstruction  of  correspondence
     transmitted  via  first  class,  certified,  and  registered
     United States  Mail, under  color of  law  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702;

(2)  aiding and  abetting the  act of  tampering with  a  federal
     grand jury  (25 counts),  in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2  and
     1512;


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 4 of 9


(3)  aiding and  abetting obstruction  of criminal investigations
     (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510;

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,
     specifically the  Right  to  Petition  a  lawfully  convened
     federal grand  jury for  a formal investigation (25 counts),
     in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242;

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of  the  above  (25  counts),  in
     violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371;


Does 1 thru 10:

(1)  aiding  and  abetting  the  obstruction  of  correspondence,
     transmitted  via  first  class,  certified,  and  registered
     United States Mail, under color of law (one or more counts),
     in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702;

(2)  aiding and  abetting the  act of  tampering with  a  federal
     grand jury (one or more counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2
     and 1512;

(3)  aiding and  abetting obstruction  of criminal investigations
     (one or more counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510;

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,
     specifically the  Right  to  Petition  a  lawfully  convened
     federal grand  jury for  a formal investigation (one or more
     counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242;

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all of the above (one or more counts),
     in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371;

(6)  retaliating against  a witness,  victim, or an informant (12
     counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1513;

(7)  misprision of  felony (one  or more counts), in violation of
     18 U.S.C. 4.

                   NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR FRAUD

     Complainant  hereby   formally  refuses  Mr.  Procter  Hug's

alleged  dismissal   of  the   instant  Complaint   of   Judicial

Misconduct, for all of the following reasons, to wit:

     (1)  Mr. Hug's  judicial  compensation  is  presently  being

diminished unlawfully  by federal  income taxes,  in violation of

Article III, Section 1, of the Constitution for the United States

of America,  as lawfully amended;  this diminution is evidence of

a bias,  and of  an unlawful conflict of interest, because of the


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 5 of 9


existence of  a prior  contract with  a real party of interest --

the "Internal  Revenue Service"  [sic], as represented by suspect

Evangelina Cardenas alleging falsely to be a Special Agent [sic].

     (2)  Mr. Hug committed a serious error by merely insinuating

that Complainant  had violated one or more of the prohibitions of

18 U.S.C.  1504, without  specifically  enumerating  any  further

details, when  the second  paragraph of said statute very clearly

reserves to  Complainant the  Right to  petition a  competent and

qualified federal  grand jury  for an  opportunity to appear, and

also for  a formal  investigation into  testimony and documentary

evidence which  Complainant sought,  and still  seeks,  to  bring

before said  grand jury.   It was not appropriate for Mr. John M.

Roll either  to keep, or to forward, communications to Mr. Robert

L.  Miskell,  because  said  acts  contributed  directly  to  the

obstruction of said communications and permanently prevented same

from ever reaching the foreperson of said grand jury, in repeated

and premeditated violations of 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 371, and 1510.

     (3)  Complainant has  challenged  officials  of  the  United

States Postal  Service ("USPS")  to  produce  all  statutory  and

constitutional authorities  which might  otherwise  permit,  with

impunity, a  federal judge permanently to obstruct correspondence

directed to  the foreperson  of a federal grand jury, and no such

authorities were  ever produced.   On  the contrary, every single

employee of  the USPS  whom Complainant  has approached with this

question, has  answered in  the negative,  namely, there  are  no

authorities whatsoever  which permit  federal judges  to obstruct

first class, certified and/or registered United States Mail, when

said mail was directed to the foreperson of a federal grand jury,

and when  return receipt  and restricted  delivery services  were

also requested and purchased from the USPS counter clerks.


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 6 of 9


     (4)  Mr. Hug  admits to  having  made  at  most  a  "limited

inquiry" into  the voluminous documentation which Complainant has

filed with  the Clerk  of the  United States Court of Appeals for

the Ninth  Circuit, and  which Complainant  incorporated into the

instant Complaint  by reference,  as if  set forth  fully herein.

Moreover, Mr.  Hug never  made a  judicial determination that the

instant Complaint  was extraordinary  in any way, and yet Mr. Hug

violated the  Ninth Circuit's own rules for expeditious review of

proper  Complaints  of  Judicial  Misconduct  or  Disability,  by

exceeding the  guidelines for  same.  This "limited inquiry," and

these unnecessary  delays, in  processing the  instant Complaint,

have combined  to work an irreparable prejudice upon Complainant,

in violation  of Complainant's  fundamental Rights to due process

of law,  as guaranteed  by the  Fifth Amendment  in the  Bill  of

Rights, and to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances,

in violation  of the  First Amendment  in  the  Bill  of  Rights.

Silence can  be equated  with a fraud where there is a legal or a

moral duty  to speak.   Complainant  hereby charges  that Mr. Hug

abused discretion by waiting an inordinate and unjustified amount

of time, before alleging to dismiss the instant Complaint.


                          VERIFICATION

     Complainant hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under

the laws  of the  United States  of America,  without the "United

States", that  the foregoing  statement  of  facts  is  true  and

correct, to the best of Counsel's current information, knowledge,

and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 7 of 9


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A.,  M.S.,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years

of age  and a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and

that I personally served the following document(s):

              NOTICE AND DEMAND TO APPEAR BEFORE A
           COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED FEDERAL GRAND JURY;
   VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT;  NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSE:
 18 U.S.C. 4, 1504, 1512, 1513;  Petition & Due Process Clauses

by placing  said document(s)  with exhibits in first class United

States Mail,  with postage  prepaid and properly addressed to the

following individuals:


ROBERT L. MISKELL [sic]            John M. Roll [sic]
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      U.S. District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state

JANET NAPOLITANO [sic]             Clerk of Court
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      United States District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state

Grand Jury Foreperson              Postmaster
In re: New Life Health Center Co.  U.S. Post Office
55 E. Broadway                     Downtown Station
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state

Judge Alex Kozinski                Evangelina Cardenas [sic]
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals     "Internal Revenue Service"
125 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 200     300 West Congress
Pasadena, California state         Tucson, Arizona state

Attorney General                   Solicitor General
Department of Justice              Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.        10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington, D.C.                   Washington, D.C.

Thomas H. Basham                   Eugene A. Burns
Federal Bureau of Investigation    New Life Health Center Company
201 East Indianola                 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27
Phoenix, Arizona state             Tucson, Arizona state

Chief Judge
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
c/o P.O. Box 193939
San Francisco, California


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 8 of 9


Executed on August 21, 1997:

/s/ Paul Mitchell
_______________________________________________________
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
Counselor at Law, and Vice President for Legal Affairs,
New Life Health Center Company, Tucson, Arizona state

All Rights Reserved without prejudice


Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause:
                         Page 9 of 9


                             #  #  #

========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail