Time: Sun Aug 24 02:01:06 1997
	by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA19874;
	Sat, 23 Aug 1997 12:13:01 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 12:11:35 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Brafman v. United States, 384 F.2d 863, 867 (1967)

Dear Clients and Friends,

I had a delightful conversation with one of
you this morning, and the main topic of 
discussion was IRS "assessments" -- a very
key legal term in the whole tax collection process.

I was going to say "Lexicon", but it is probably
more appropriate to say "Illexicon".

Lex Icon!  Now, there's a great new pen name.
(I get foist dibbs.)

A very authoritative decision was made by the
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1967, basically
holding that the burden of proving an assessment
is NOT carried, unless an assessment (Form 23-C) 
is signed by an assessment officer [sic].  

Here is the full citation:

  Brafman v. U.S., 384 F.2d 863, 867 (5th Cir., 1967)

I encourage you to pull and study this case, because
it contains some very encouraging words about burden
of proof, and all that kind of stuff.

Confer at "Stuff" in Brown's Illegal Dictionary.

(Just kidding here, to see if you are still awake :)

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail