Time: Sun Sep 21 11:53:53 1997 by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA02420 for [address in toolbar]; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 11:22:44 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 11:22:27 -0700 To: supremelaw@ibm.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Citizen's Arrest FYI: Hi Nick. I will add you to our list of "Friends", until/unless we receive further notice from you. "Friends" receive about 20% of our posts. The Supreme Law School receive everything. We are using the Citizen's Arrest notice as a political action tool, by sending it to airport commissioners, train station managers, police and firemen, highway patrol, sheriffs, and so on. These are points of entry, and of exit. In other words, we are "testing the waters" with respect to their willingness to assist (with REAL back-up) in the event that Reno should ever enter, and then attempt to exit, the state of Arizona. She has now been served with the required Miranda Notice, so the only thing left is apprehension (handcuffs, booking, and arraignment). The Miranda Notice is given in our NOTICE OF INTENT. Here is the precise language you would need to use: "Janet Reno. You are under arrest. You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to an attorney. Anything which you say, or do, from this point forward, can and will be held against you in a court of law." You don't need to wait for her answer. Just be sure there are witnesses to your Miranda Warning. You should practice this Warning, verbally, so that it comes out perfect, every time. In the real situation, the pressure will be intense to falter; don't falter, just go forward. Can't you see halting a 747, which is about to taxi from the jetway, in order to prevent the escape of a known murder suspect? That is one of the main reasons why you need to coordinate such an action with airport authorities, i.e. Airport Manager, Commissioners, and so on. This is the stuff of high drama, no? Such action is also entirely justified by the pertinent statutes. If the airport authorities obstruct the arrest, they are guilty of interfering with a lawful arrest. You can also commandeer helpers, just as a peace officer might do, to perfect the arrest. Again, confirm this authority to "commandeer" -- in your state statutes. By this I mean that you could commandeer the airport police to assist you, in every way necessary to bring Reno before a state judge, for arraignment. We are also encouraging lots of people, in lots of other Union states, to take the same position. For example, I am also the private attorney general in the case of People v. United States et al. in west Texas state. Even though that case has gone nowhere (predictably), I remain the Relator of record in that case, which would give me standing to execute the Citizen's Arrest in Texas, via designated agents (i.e. agents who will volunteer to assist me on-site, even though I remain in Arizona). Since the case of People v. United States, in Billings, Montana, is now in limbo, that case also renders me the private attorney general on behalf of all the People of the United States of America. The pleadings in that case are now loaded into the Supreme Law Library, FYI. Please tell all your friends about these pleadings; I believe they are historic, in many ways. So far, the arrest idea has met with a wide range of responses. I am pleased to tell you that the security firm which we have hired, is behind the idea 100%, particularly after taking our suggestion as a reason to review the precise statutes in Arizona which govern Citizen's Arrest. These security personnel have quite a vast range of U.S. military experience, in numerous security situations. Having defended our country in combat situations, they have no hesitation to defend American children against a murder suspect now sitting in high office. Her arrest is a challenge which they now look forward to executing. I believe that all states have similar statutes. If you are in doubt, I would file an "Ex Parte" action, requesting declaratory judgment as to the propriety of exercising those statutes, in a real-life situation. You wouldn't need to mention Reno; but of course, it would certainly be interesting if you did -- by way of requesting the court's blessing to execute the Arrest, upon adjudication of probable cause. This is the main reason why you would want to review your state's specific statutes, because they are normally written to authorize arrest _without_ a court's prior approval. The Arizona states are so written. We have the court authorities which held that you can use the courts for political purposes. I hope this answers your excellent question. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School, Friends At 04:10 PM 9/20/97 -0600, you wrote: >Paul, do you have a list serve? If so, how do I subscribe? >BTW, any progress/updt on your Citizen's Arrest of Reno project? > >>testing: please delete >> >>======================================================================== >>Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness >>B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine >> >>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night >>email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU >>website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now >>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this >> >>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall >>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. >>======================================================================== >>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> > >/s/ Nick Landholt / cia@mwconnect.com / website: www.wimall.com/fatima > > ><> ><> Visit www.networkusa.org and www.waco93.com for a glimpse <>< <>< > at the diabolical agenda rapidly devouring ex-Christian America. > >The C.hristian I.nformation A.ssociation [ ><> ]was established to awaken >conquered Americans (a nation of Dupes, Sheep and Wimps) to their status as >a Dispossessed Majority. For more info, send me your snail mail address. > >The C.I.A. informs its members of: > >1) The voluntary nature of the income "tax", as recently verified by a U.S. >Senator in a 1997 USA Today article, and how they can legally drop out. >2) Computer VoteFraud which keeps in tact our corrupt legislative system. >3) How we can abolish the Federal Reserve by implementing Social Credit, >which has been called "Christianity applied in economics". >4) How jury nullification can solve our corrupt judicial system. > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail