Time: Fri Aug 22 21:24:45 1997
	by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA02261;
	Fri, 22 Aug 1997 14:13:49 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 14:12:24 -0700
To: MSmith6791@aol.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Conspiracy Theorists Invade College (fwd)

There are just too many fakes of Zapruder
floating around, including the ones which
Life Magazine altered, by swapping frame
numbers.  Take that into serious account,
okay?  It is clear they are trying to cover up
the reaction of the cranium to the high-speed
impact.  Remember, the motorcycle Cop, riding
to Kennedy's left rear, got sprayed with brains
and blood.  Your trajectory here would not have
done that.  The Zapruder original shows cloud of
atomized blood, as car moves forward.  The
motorcycle ran right into it.  Get down to
precision as to that motorcycle's exact 
trajectory:  we are talking one-inch 
tolerances here.  You must think like an
engineer, to solve this one.  On exit, the 
high-speed fragmentation bullet would result
in exploding the cranium;  that is exactly what
happened.  You need a very long-barrel rifle, 
to accelerate the bullet to such a high speed;
hand guns have a much shorter barrel, right?
Do your own comparisons:  muzzle velocity of
40 calibers (then!), versus muzzle velocity of 
.3006 deer rifles (then).  That answers your question
completely, I believe.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

At 04:11 PM 8/22/97 -0400, you wrote:
>->  SearchNet's   SNETNEWS   Mailing List
>In a message dated 8/22/97 8:03:53 PM, you wrote:
><<An animated sequence of key frames from
>the Zapruder Film is now available on the
>Internet.  Polaroid Woman is clearly visible
>in this sequence, although the version of
>the Internet animation which I saw, did not
>draw any attention to her.  I have since 
>contacted the webmaster of that site, and
>he agrees that Polaroid Woman is clearly
>visible, raising her camera to click off
>what has to be THE most important single
>photo ever taken of JFK's murder scene.>>
>*** So you don't believe the section of film I have showing the driver
>shotting Connely and Kennedy is valid?  You see the gun puffing, you hear 2
>shots, first at Connelly as he reacts and slides down in the seat, and then
>you see the second puff, hear the sound and see K. head blow off from that
>direction?  No good? Not valid?
>Michael Smith
>-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>->  Posted by: MSmith6791@aol.com

Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail